Comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern Algeria

Abstract The northeastern of Algeria is the rainiest region of the country, where regional catchments are often subject to devastating floods. To improve the management of water resources, there is a need to develop rainfall–runoff models. This study was conducted to propose an event‐based flood pre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ishak Abdi, Mohamed Meddi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Flood Risk Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12672
id doaj-83447f4258bb47d0b50d76f8622dec9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83447f4258bb47d0b50d76f8622dec9b2021-02-15T15:02:32ZengWileyJournal of Flood Risk Management1753-318X2021-03-01141n/an/a10.1111/jfr3.12672Comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern AlgeriaIshak Abdi0Mohamed Meddi1Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Hydraulique, LGEE Blida AlgeriaEcole Nationale Supérieure d'Hydraulique, LGEE Blida AlgeriaAbstract The northeastern of Algeria is the rainiest region of the country, where regional catchments are often subject to devastating floods. To improve the management of water resources, there is a need to develop rainfall–runoff models. This study was conducted to propose an event‐based flood prediction model adapted to the region. Thereby, available rainfall–runoff data were used in several models to find the best one able to reproduce the flood hydrographs in three catchments. These models are based on the coupling of both production and transfer functions. For this purpose, five production functions were tested: the Soil Conservation Service–Curve Number (SCS‐CN) model, including three antecedent moisture conditions, and four modified Mishra and Singh models, incorporating antecedent moisture amounts. Three transfer functions were also tested: the Nash, Clark, and Weibull models. The tested models were all calibrated through a multi‐objective optimisation using the genetic algorithms method. It was found that the MMS models were better than the SCS‐CN method according to the performance criteria. Moreover, the proposed modified empirical equation (M4) improved runoff prediction. Furthermore, combined with the Nash model as a transfer function, the coupled model was found to be the best performing model, giving satisfactory results.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12672antecedent moistureevent‐basedflood predictiongenetic algorithmsmodified Mishra Singh modelrainfall–runoff model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ishak Abdi
Mohamed Meddi
spellingShingle Ishak Abdi
Mohamed Meddi
Comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern Algeria
Journal of Flood Risk Management
antecedent moisture
event‐based
flood prediction
genetic algorithms
modified Mishra Singh model
rainfall–runoff model
author_facet Ishak Abdi
Mohamed Meddi
author_sort Ishak Abdi
title Comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern Algeria
title_short Comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern Algeria
title_full Comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern Algeria
title_fullStr Comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern Algeria
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern Algeria
title_sort comparison of conceptual rainfall–runoff models in semi‐arid watersheds of eastern algeria
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Flood Risk Management
issn 1753-318X
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract The northeastern of Algeria is the rainiest region of the country, where regional catchments are often subject to devastating floods. To improve the management of water resources, there is a need to develop rainfall–runoff models. This study was conducted to propose an event‐based flood prediction model adapted to the region. Thereby, available rainfall–runoff data were used in several models to find the best one able to reproduce the flood hydrographs in three catchments. These models are based on the coupling of both production and transfer functions. For this purpose, five production functions were tested: the Soil Conservation Service–Curve Number (SCS‐CN) model, including three antecedent moisture conditions, and four modified Mishra and Singh models, incorporating antecedent moisture amounts. Three transfer functions were also tested: the Nash, Clark, and Weibull models. The tested models were all calibrated through a multi‐objective optimisation using the genetic algorithms method. It was found that the MMS models were better than the SCS‐CN method according to the performance criteria. Moreover, the proposed modified empirical equation (M4) improved runoff prediction. Furthermore, combined with the Nash model as a transfer function, the coupled model was found to be the best performing model, giving satisfactory results.
topic antecedent moisture
event‐based
flood prediction
genetic algorithms
modified Mishra Singh model
rainfall–runoff model
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12672
work_keys_str_mv AT ishakabdi comparisonofconceptualrainfallrunoffmodelsinsemiaridwatershedsofeasternalgeria
AT mohamedmeddi comparisonofconceptualrainfallrunoffmodelsinsemiaridwatershedsofeasternalgeria
_version_ 1724268858760495104