Contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissues

Biologic scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are frequently used for clinical purposes of tissue regeneration. Different methods have been developed for this purpose. All methods of decellularization including chemical and physical approaches leave some damage on the ECM; however, the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohsen Rabbani, Nasrin Zakian, Nima Alimoradi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2021;volume=11;issue=1;spage=1;epage=11;aulast=Rabbani
id doaj-833dc1eb69884dcda549258254742541
record_format Article
spelling doaj-833dc1eb69884dcda5492582547425412021-02-03T07:01:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Signals and Sensors2228-74772021-01-0111111110.4103/jmss.JMSS_2_20Contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissuesMohsen RabbaniNasrin ZakianNima AlimoradiBiologic scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are frequently used for clinical purposes of tissue regeneration. Different methods have been developed for this purpose. All methods of decellularization including chemical and physical approaches leave some damage on the ECM; however, the effects of these methods are different which make some of these procedures more proper to maintain ECM structure than other methods. This review is aimed to introduce and compare new physical methods for the decellularization of different tissues and organs in tissue engineering. All recent reports and research that have used at least one physical method in the procedure of decellularization, were included and evaluated in this paper. The advantages and drawbacks of each method were examined and compared considering the effectiveness. This review tried to highlight the prospective potentials and benefits of applying physical methods for decellularization protocols in tissue engineering instead of the current chemical methods. These chemical methods are harsh in nature and were shown to be destructive and harmful to essential substances of ECM and scaffold structure. Therefore, using physical methods as a partial or even a whole protocol could save time, costs, and quality of the final acellular tissue in complicated decellularization procedures. Moreover, regarding the control factor that could be achieved easily with physical methods, optimization of different decellularization protocols would be quite satisfactory. Combined methods take advantage of both chemical and physical approaches.http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2021;volume=11;issue=1;spage=1;epage=11;aulast=Rabbanibioscaffolddecellularizationextracellular matrixphysical methodstissue engineering
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohsen Rabbani
Nasrin Zakian
Nima Alimoradi
spellingShingle Mohsen Rabbani
Nasrin Zakian
Nima Alimoradi
Contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissues
Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
bioscaffold
decellularization
extracellular matrix
physical methods
tissue engineering
author_facet Mohsen Rabbani
Nasrin Zakian
Nima Alimoradi
author_sort Mohsen Rabbani
title Contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissues
title_short Contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissues
title_full Contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissues
title_fullStr Contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissues
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissues
title_sort contribution of physical methods in decellularization of animal tissues
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
issn 2228-7477
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Biologic scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are frequently used for clinical purposes of tissue regeneration. Different methods have been developed for this purpose. All methods of decellularization including chemical and physical approaches leave some damage on the ECM; however, the effects of these methods are different which make some of these procedures more proper to maintain ECM structure than other methods. This review is aimed to introduce and compare new physical methods for the decellularization of different tissues and organs in tissue engineering. All recent reports and research that have used at least one physical method in the procedure of decellularization, were included and evaluated in this paper. The advantages and drawbacks of each method were examined and compared considering the effectiveness. This review tried to highlight the prospective potentials and benefits of applying physical methods for decellularization protocols in tissue engineering instead of the current chemical methods. These chemical methods are harsh in nature and were shown to be destructive and harmful to essential substances of ECM and scaffold structure. Therefore, using physical methods as a partial or even a whole protocol could save time, costs, and quality of the final acellular tissue in complicated decellularization procedures. Moreover, regarding the control factor that could be achieved easily with physical methods, optimization of different decellularization protocols would be quite satisfactory. Combined methods take advantage of both chemical and physical approaches.
topic bioscaffold
decellularization
extracellular matrix
physical methods
tissue engineering
url http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2021;volume=11;issue=1;spage=1;epage=11;aulast=Rabbani
work_keys_str_mv AT mohsenrabbani contributionofphysicalmethodsindecellularizationofanimaltissues
AT nasrinzakian contributionofphysicalmethodsindecellularizationofanimaltissues
AT nimaalimoradi contributionofphysicalmethodsindecellularizationofanimaltissues
_version_ 1724288477970825216