Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers

The focus of this article is to analyze the systematic quality management of educational settings the way it is present in Swedish leisure-time centers. The study explores how the production of both systematic reporting and documentation works through self technologies in this discursive practice. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Linnéa Holmberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-01-01
Series:Education Inquiry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275179
id doaj-83387ed252094f49881c210fb8d9f90a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83387ed252094f49881c210fb8d9f90a2020-11-25T01:12:08ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEducation Inquiry2000-45082017-01-0181334910.1080/20004508.2016.12751791275179Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centersLinnéa Holmberg0Stockholm UniversityThe focus of this article is to analyze the systematic quality management of educational settings the way it is present in Swedish leisure-time centers. The study explores how the production of both systematic reporting and documentation works through self technologies in this discursive practice. The analysis will illustrate and discuss how the systematic quality work viewed as a discursive practice is expected to be both self-scrutinizing and transparent, but also how this process is supposed to be made with a certain `correct´ attitude—what can be described as the ‘will to improve’. Moreover, it interrogates how the systematic quality management operates strategically and politically to exercise power on and through the personnel working at leisure-time centers. In the empirical material discussed, an ongoing subjectification appears, which takes the form of confessional practices. This can be said to be primarily about constructing a free but loyal collective subject, who produces systematic quality work in line with what the educational authorities want to happen. Such a process of subjectification gives rise to a collective subject, which is regarded as having unavoidable responsibility for an infinite need of quality improvement through confessional acts of ‘truth’.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275179Confessional practicesgovernmentalitytechnologies of the selfsystematic quality workleisure-time centers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Linnéa Holmberg
spellingShingle Linnéa Holmberg
Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers
Education Inquiry
Confessional practices
governmentality
technologies of the self
systematic quality work
leisure-time centers
author_facet Linnéa Holmberg
author_sort Linnéa Holmberg
title Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers
title_short Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers
title_full Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers
title_fullStr Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers
title_full_unstemmed Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers
title_sort confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Education Inquiry
issn 2000-4508
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The focus of this article is to analyze the systematic quality management of educational settings the way it is present in Swedish leisure-time centers. The study explores how the production of both systematic reporting and documentation works through self technologies in this discursive practice. The analysis will illustrate and discuss how the systematic quality work viewed as a discursive practice is expected to be both self-scrutinizing and transparent, but also how this process is supposed to be made with a certain `correct´ attitude—what can be described as the ‘will to improve’. Moreover, it interrogates how the systematic quality management operates strategically and politically to exercise power on and through the personnel working at leisure-time centers. In the empirical material discussed, an ongoing subjectification appears, which takes the form of confessional practices. This can be said to be primarily about constructing a free but loyal collective subject, who produces systematic quality work in line with what the educational authorities want to happen. Such a process of subjectification gives rise to a collective subject, which is regarded as having unavoidable responsibility for an infinite need of quality improvement through confessional acts of ‘truth’.
topic Confessional practices
governmentality
technologies of the self
systematic quality work
leisure-time centers
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275179
work_keys_str_mv AT linneaholmberg confessingthewilltoimprovesystematicqualitymanagementinleisuretimecenters
_version_ 1725168357974474752