Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers
The focus of this article is to analyze the systematic quality management of educational settings the way it is present in Swedish leisure-time centers. The study explores how the production of both systematic reporting and documentation works through self technologies in this discursive practice. T...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Education Inquiry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275179 |
id |
doaj-83387ed252094f49881c210fb8d9f90a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-83387ed252094f49881c210fb8d9f90a2020-11-25T01:12:08ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEducation Inquiry2000-45082017-01-0181334910.1080/20004508.2016.12751791275179Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centersLinnéa Holmberg0Stockholm UniversityThe focus of this article is to analyze the systematic quality management of educational settings the way it is present in Swedish leisure-time centers. The study explores how the production of both systematic reporting and documentation works through self technologies in this discursive practice. The analysis will illustrate and discuss how the systematic quality work viewed as a discursive practice is expected to be both self-scrutinizing and transparent, but also how this process is supposed to be made with a certain `correct´ attitude—what can be described as the ‘will to improve’. Moreover, it interrogates how the systematic quality management operates strategically and politically to exercise power on and through the personnel working at leisure-time centers. In the empirical material discussed, an ongoing subjectification appears, which takes the form of confessional practices. This can be said to be primarily about constructing a free but loyal collective subject, who produces systematic quality work in line with what the educational authorities want to happen. Such a process of subjectification gives rise to a collective subject, which is regarded as having unavoidable responsibility for an infinite need of quality improvement through confessional acts of ‘truth’.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275179Confessional practicesgovernmentalitytechnologies of the selfsystematic quality workleisure-time centers |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Linnéa Holmberg |
spellingShingle |
Linnéa Holmberg Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers Education Inquiry Confessional practices governmentality technologies of the self systematic quality work leisure-time centers |
author_facet |
Linnéa Holmberg |
author_sort |
Linnéa Holmberg |
title |
Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers |
title_short |
Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers |
title_full |
Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers |
title_fullStr |
Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers |
title_sort |
confessing the will to improve: systematic quality management in leisure-time centers |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Education Inquiry |
issn |
2000-4508 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
The focus of this article is to analyze the systematic quality management of educational settings the way it is present in Swedish leisure-time centers. The study explores how the production of both systematic reporting and documentation works through self technologies in this discursive practice. The analysis will illustrate and discuss how the systematic quality work viewed as a discursive practice is expected to be both self-scrutinizing and transparent, but also how this process is supposed to be made with a certain `correct´ attitude—what can be described as the ‘will to improve’. Moreover, it interrogates how the systematic quality management operates strategically and politically to exercise power on and through the personnel working at leisure-time centers. In the empirical material discussed, an ongoing subjectification appears, which takes the form of confessional practices. This can be said to be primarily about constructing a free but loyal collective subject, who produces systematic quality work in line with what the educational authorities want to happen. Such a process of subjectification gives rise to a collective subject, which is regarded as having unavoidable responsibility for an infinite need of quality improvement through confessional acts of ‘truth’. |
topic |
Confessional practices governmentality technologies of the self systematic quality work leisure-time centers |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275179 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT linneaholmberg confessingthewilltoimprovesystematicqualitymanagementinleisuretimecenters |
_version_ |
1725168357974474752 |