The concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the Russian public discourse on migration to Siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)

Based on publicistic materials of the second half of the 19-th century, the article analyzes the interpretation of Siberian colonization in the Russian public discourse in the form of a crossroad of a “civilization frontier” and entrance into the space of “other”. Following M. Bakhtin dialogue theor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aizikova Irina, Matveenko Irina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2016-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801004
id doaj-8335a9ff451e4ee7b63000ea57982698
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8335a9ff451e4ee7b63000ea579826982021-02-02T00:27:29ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242016-01-01280100410.1051/shsconf/20162801004shsconf_rptss2016_01004The concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the Russian public discourse on migration to Siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)Aizikova Irina0Matveenko Irina1Tomsk State UniversityTomsk Polytechnic UniversityBased on publicistic materials of the second half of the 19-th century, the article analyzes the interpretation of Siberian colonization in the Russian public discourse in the form of a crossroad of a “civilization frontier” and entrance into the space of “other”. Following M. Bakhtin dialogue theory, the dialogue between “own self” and “another”, accompanying the migration to Siberia, was thought to be not an “introduction” to identification, but identification itself. In this aspect, the Russian discourse on migration to Siberia developed in accordance with the polyglossia law. The issues of the colonization process idealization of Siberian land and its participants were at the top of the discourse. The idea of Siberia colonization was commonly considered as a way to discover a new better life for the given territory and the central Russia. There was an idea of Siberia as “a Promised Land”, which was opposed to another tendency in the public discourse, i.e. demythologization of Siberia and development of “own self” and “another” dialogue. The conclusion is made concerning the fact that the research material presented can be interpreted as an important stage in the complex history of identification and self-identification in Siberian region in the form of a special territory both geographically and culturally.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801004
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aizikova Irina
Matveenko Irina
spellingShingle Aizikova Irina
Matveenko Irina
The concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the Russian public discourse on migration to Siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Aizikova Irina
Matveenko Irina
author_sort Aizikova Irina
title The concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the Russian public discourse on migration to Siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)
title_short The concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the Russian public discourse on migration to Siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)
title_full The concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the Russian public discourse on migration to Siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)
title_fullStr The concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the Russian public discourse on migration to Siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)
title_full_unstemmed The concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the Russian public discourse on migration to Siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)
title_sort concept of “other” and the problem of tolerance in the russian public discourse on migration to siberia in the 1850-1890’s (based on publicistic materials)
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Based on publicistic materials of the second half of the 19-th century, the article analyzes the interpretation of Siberian colonization in the Russian public discourse in the form of a crossroad of a “civilization frontier” and entrance into the space of “other”. Following M. Bakhtin dialogue theory, the dialogue between “own self” and “another”, accompanying the migration to Siberia, was thought to be not an “introduction” to identification, but identification itself. In this aspect, the Russian discourse on migration to Siberia developed in accordance with the polyglossia law. The issues of the colonization process idealization of Siberian land and its participants were at the top of the discourse. The idea of Siberia colonization was commonly considered as a way to discover a new better life for the given territory and the central Russia. There was an idea of Siberia as “a Promised Land”, which was opposed to another tendency in the public discourse, i.e. demythologization of Siberia and development of “own self” and “another” dialogue. The conclusion is made concerning the fact that the research material presented can be interpreted as an important stage in the complex history of identification and self-identification in Siberian region in the form of a special territory both geographically and culturally.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801004
work_keys_str_mv AT aizikovairina theconceptofotherandtheproblemoftoleranceintherussianpublicdiscourseonmigrationtosiberiainthe18501890sbasedonpublicisticmaterials
AT matveenkoirina theconceptofotherandtheproblemoftoleranceintherussianpublicdiscourseonmigrationtosiberiainthe18501890sbasedonpublicisticmaterials
AT aizikovairina conceptofotherandtheproblemoftoleranceintherussianpublicdiscourseonmigrationtosiberiainthe18501890sbasedonpublicisticmaterials
AT matveenkoirina conceptofotherandtheproblemoftoleranceintherussianpublicdiscourseonmigrationtosiberiainthe18501890sbasedonpublicisticmaterials
_version_ 1724313735565148160