From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration

Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration has evolved dramatically—from a focus on the West and disinterest and neglect of regional integration in the 1990s, to vigorous efforts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space under Russian leadership in the period between 2009 and 2014, to formin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrej Krickovic, Igor Pellicciari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Eurasian Studies
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366521998808
id doaj-832e43fb95f745c3b0e3f4594f4f12a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-832e43fb95f745c3b0e3f4594f4f12a52021-05-07T22:04:19ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Eurasian Studies1879-36651879-36732021-01-011210.1177/1879366521998808From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integrationAndrej Krickovic0Igor Pellicciari1International Laboratory on International Order Studies and the New Regionalism, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, RussiaUniversity of Urbino, Urbino, ItalyRussia’s approach to alignment and regional integration has evolved dramatically—from a focus on the West and disinterest and neglect of regional integration in the 1990s, to vigorous efforts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space under Russian leadership in the period between 2009 and 2014, to forming a “Greater Eurasia” that transcends the post-Soviet space and includes China and other non-Western powers (such as Turkey, India, and Iran) today. Status concerns are key to understanding this evolution in policy and vision as a declining Russia struggles to avoid losing great power status. Russia initially eschewed its relationships with post-Soviet states in favor of integration with Europe and the West, which seemed to offer greater status gains. When Russia failed to find a place in the Western liberal order and “Greater Europe” commensurate with its status aspirations, it shifted its attention to regional integration of the post-Soviet space, believing this would make Russia, in the words of President Putin, “one of the poles in a future multipolar world.” However, integrating the post-Soviet space proved to be an arduous task (that failed miserably in Ukraine) and did not yield the status gains Russia hoped for. The scope of Eurasian integration has now shifted to the formation of a “Greater Eurasia,” as Russia looks to gain status through its association with more dynamic rising and emerging powers.https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366521998808
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrej Krickovic
Igor Pellicciari
spellingShingle Andrej Krickovic
Igor Pellicciari
From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration
Journal of Eurasian Studies
author_facet Andrej Krickovic
Igor Pellicciari
author_sort Andrej Krickovic
title From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration
title_short From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration
title_full From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration
title_fullStr From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration
title_full_unstemmed From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration
title_sort from “greater europe” to “greater eurasia”: status concerns and the evolution of russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Eurasian Studies
issn 1879-3665
1879-3673
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration has evolved dramatically—from a focus on the West and disinterest and neglect of regional integration in the 1990s, to vigorous efforts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space under Russian leadership in the period between 2009 and 2014, to forming a “Greater Eurasia” that transcends the post-Soviet space and includes China and other non-Western powers (such as Turkey, India, and Iran) today. Status concerns are key to understanding this evolution in policy and vision as a declining Russia struggles to avoid losing great power status. Russia initially eschewed its relationships with post-Soviet states in favor of integration with Europe and the West, which seemed to offer greater status gains. When Russia failed to find a place in the Western liberal order and “Greater Europe” commensurate with its status aspirations, it shifted its attention to regional integration of the post-Soviet space, believing this would make Russia, in the words of President Putin, “one of the poles in a future multipolar world.” However, integrating the post-Soviet space proved to be an arduous task (that failed miserably in Ukraine) and did not yield the status gains Russia hoped for. The scope of Eurasian integration has now shifted to the formation of a “Greater Eurasia,” as Russia looks to gain status through its association with more dynamic rising and emerging powers.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366521998808
work_keys_str_mv AT andrejkrickovic fromgreatereuropetogreatereurasiastatusconcernsandtheevolutionofrussiasapproachtoalignmentandregionalintegration
AT igorpellicciari fromgreatereuropetogreatereurasiastatusconcernsandtheevolutionofrussiasapproachtoalignmentandregionalintegration
_version_ 1721455259326349312