From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration
Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration has evolved dramatically—from a focus on the West and disinterest and neglect of regional integration in the 1990s, to vigorous efforts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space under Russian leadership in the period between 2009 and 2014, to formin...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Eurasian Studies |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366521998808 |
id |
doaj-832e43fb95f745c3b0e3f4594f4f12a5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-832e43fb95f745c3b0e3f4594f4f12a52021-05-07T22:04:19ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Eurasian Studies1879-36651879-36732021-01-011210.1177/1879366521998808From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integrationAndrej Krickovic0Igor Pellicciari1International Laboratory on International Order Studies and the New Regionalism, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, RussiaUniversity of Urbino, Urbino, ItalyRussia’s approach to alignment and regional integration has evolved dramatically—from a focus on the West and disinterest and neglect of regional integration in the 1990s, to vigorous efforts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space under Russian leadership in the period between 2009 and 2014, to forming a “Greater Eurasia” that transcends the post-Soviet space and includes China and other non-Western powers (such as Turkey, India, and Iran) today. Status concerns are key to understanding this evolution in policy and vision as a declining Russia struggles to avoid losing great power status. Russia initially eschewed its relationships with post-Soviet states in favor of integration with Europe and the West, which seemed to offer greater status gains. When Russia failed to find a place in the Western liberal order and “Greater Europe” commensurate with its status aspirations, it shifted its attention to regional integration of the post-Soviet space, believing this would make Russia, in the words of President Putin, “one of the poles in a future multipolar world.” However, integrating the post-Soviet space proved to be an arduous task (that failed miserably in Ukraine) and did not yield the status gains Russia hoped for. The scope of Eurasian integration has now shifted to the formation of a “Greater Eurasia,” as Russia looks to gain status through its association with more dynamic rising and emerging powers.https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366521998808 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrej Krickovic Igor Pellicciari |
spellingShingle |
Andrej Krickovic Igor Pellicciari From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration Journal of Eurasian Studies |
author_facet |
Andrej Krickovic Igor Pellicciari |
author_sort |
Andrej Krickovic |
title |
From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration |
title_short |
From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration |
title_full |
From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration |
title_fullStr |
From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration |
title_full_unstemmed |
From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration |
title_sort |
from “greater europe” to “greater eurasia”: status concerns and the evolution of russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Eurasian Studies |
issn |
1879-3665 1879-3673 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration has evolved dramatically—from a focus on the West and disinterest and neglect of regional integration in the 1990s, to vigorous efforts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space under Russian leadership in the period between 2009 and 2014, to forming a “Greater Eurasia” that transcends the post-Soviet space and includes China and other non-Western powers (such as Turkey, India, and Iran) today. Status concerns are key to understanding this evolution in policy and vision as a declining Russia struggles to avoid losing great power status. Russia initially eschewed its relationships with post-Soviet states in favor of integration with Europe and the West, which seemed to offer greater status gains. When Russia failed to find a place in the Western liberal order and “Greater Europe” commensurate with its status aspirations, it shifted its attention to regional integration of the post-Soviet space, believing this would make Russia, in the words of President Putin, “one of the poles in a future multipolar world.” However, integrating the post-Soviet space proved to be an arduous task (that failed miserably in Ukraine) and did not yield the status gains Russia hoped for. The scope of Eurasian integration has now shifted to the formation of a “Greater Eurasia,” as Russia looks to gain status through its association with more dynamic rising and emerging powers. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366521998808 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrejkrickovic fromgreatereuropetogreatereurasiastatusconcernsandtheevolutionofrussiasapproachtoalignmentandregionalintegration AT igorpellicciari fromgreatereuropetogreatereurasiastatusconcernsandtheevolutionofrussiasapproachtoalignmentandregionalintegration |
_version_ |
1721455259326349312 |