Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism
ABSTRACT Temporal dynamists argue that we should believe that there exists temporal passage because there being passage is the best explanation for the presence of our temporal phenomenology. Presentists argue that presentism is the best (and perhaps only coherent) version of temporal dynamism. Ther...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
|
Series: | Manuscrito |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000400183&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-831c31afa9ad41d2a9bff40bf2730404 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-831c31afa9ad41d2a9bff40bf27304042020-11-25T00:02:28ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X39418320110.1590/0100-6045.2016.v39n4.kjS0100-60452016000400183Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and PhysicalismKristie MillerJane Weiling LooABSTRACT Temporal dynamists argue that we should believe that there exists temporal passage because there being passage is the best explanation for the presence of our temporal phenomenology. Presentists argue that presentism is the best (and perhaps only coherent) version of temporal dynamism. Therefore, conditional on us accepting temporal dynamism, we should accept presentism. In this paper it is argued that if we understand temporal passage as the presentist does, such an argument can succeed only if dualism is true. Thus, we conclude, either presentists should embrace dualism, or they should reject any argument for presentism that proceeds via any such argument for temporal passage that proceeds via considerations of what best explains our temporal phenomenologyhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000400183&lng=en&tlng=enPresentismPassagePhysicalismPhenomenology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kristie Miller Jane Weiling Loo |
spellingShingle |
Kristie Miller Jane Weiling Loo Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism Manuscrito Presentism Passage Physicalism Phenomenology |
author_facet |
Kristie Miller Jane Weiling Loo |
author_sort |
Kristie Miller |
title |
Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism |
title_short |
Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism |
title_full |
Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism |
title_fullStr |
Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism |
title_sort |
presentism, passage, phenomenology and physicalism |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
series |
Manuscrito |
issn |
2317-630X |
description |
ABSTRACT Temporal dynamists argue that we should believe that there exists temporal passage because there being passage is the best explanation for the presence of our temporal phenomenology. Presentists argue that presentism is the best (and perhaps only coherent) version of temporal dynamism. Therefore, conditional on us accepting temporal dynamism, we should accept presentism. In this paper it is argued that if we understand temporal passage as the presentist does, such an argument can succeed only if dualism is true. Thus, we conclude, either presentists should embrace dualism, or they should reject any argument for presentism that proceeds via any such argument for temporal passage that proceeds via considerations of what best explains our temporal phenomenology |
topic |
Presentism Passage Physicalism Phenomenology |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000400183&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kristiemiller presentismpassagephenomenologyandphysicalism AT janeweilingloo presentismpassagephenomenologyandphysicalism |
_version_ |
1725437569575944192 |