Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism

ABSTRACT Temporal dynamists argue that we should believe that there exists temporal passage because there being passage is the best explanation for the presence of our temporal phenomenology. Presentists argue that presentism is the best (and perhaps only coherent) version of temporal dynamism. Ther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristie Miller, Jane Weiling Loo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Series:Manuscrito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000400183&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-831c31afa9ad41d2a9bff40bf2730404
record_format Article
spelling doaj-831c31afa9ad41d2a9bff40bf27304042020-11-25T00:02:28ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X39418320110.1590/0100-6045.2016.v39n4.kjS0100-60452016000400183Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and PhysicalismKristie MillerJane Weiling LooABSTRACT Temporal dynamists argue that we should believe that there exists temporal passage because there being passage is the best explanation for the presence of our temporal phenomenology. Presentists argue that presentism is the best (and perhaps only coherent) version of temporal dynamism. Therefore, conditional on us accepting temporal dynamism, we should accept presentism. In this paper it is argued that if we understand temporal passage as the presentist does, such an argument can succeed only if dualism is true. Thus, we conclude, either presentists should embrace dualism, or they should reject any argument for presentism that proceeds via any such argument for temporal passage that proceeds via considerations of what best explains our temporal phenomenologyhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000400183&lng=en&tlng=enPresentismPassagePhysicalismPhenomenology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristie Miller
Jane Weiling Loo
spellingShingle Kristie Miller
Jane Weiling Loo
Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism
Manuscrito
Presentism
Passage
Physicalism
Phenomenology
author_facet Kristie Miller
Jane Weiling Loo
author_sort Kristie Miller
title Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism
title_short Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism
title_full Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism
title_fullStr Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism
title_full_unstemmed Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism
title_sort presentism, passage, phenomenology and physicalism
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Manuscrito
issn 2317-630X
description ABSTRACT Temporal dynamists argue that we should believe that there exists temporal passage because there being passage is the best explanation for the presence of our temporal phenomenology. Presentists argue that presentism is the best (and perhaps only coherent) version of temporal dynamism. Therefore, conditional on us accepting temporal dynamism, we should accept presentism. In this paper it is argued that if we understand temporal passage as the presentist does, such an argument can succeed only if dualism is true. Thus, we conclude, either presentists should embrace dualism, or they should reject any argument for presentism that proceeds via any such argument for temporal passage that proceeds via considerations of what best explains our temporal phenomenology
topic Presentism
Passage
Physicalism
Phenomenology
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000400183&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT kristiemiller presentismpassagephenomenologyandphysicalism
AT janeweilingloo presentismpassagephenomenologyandphysicalism
_version_ 1725437569575944192