Prognostic Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

• Main Authors: Weiwei Chen MD, Shenjiao Huang PHD, Kun Shi PHD, Lisha Yi MD, Yaqiong Liu MD, Wenjie Liu PHD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-09-01
• Series: Cancer Control
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748211033743

Objective Studies have published the association between the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and the outcome of cervical cancer. However, the prognostic value in cervical cancer remains controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic functions of MMP expression in cervical cancer. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify the eligible studies according to defined selection and excluding criteria and analyzed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Fixed and random effects models were evaluated through the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progress-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 18 eligible studies including 1967 patients were analyzed for prognostic value. Totally 16 selected studies including 21 tests were relevant to the cervical cancer OS, 4 studies focused on RFS, and 1 study on PFS. The combined pooled HRs and 95% CIs of OS were calculated with random-effects models (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.01–2.65, P = .000). In the subgroup analysis for OS, there was no heterogeneity in MMP-2 (I 2 = .0%, P = .880), MMP-1 (I 2 = .0%, P = .587), and MMP-14 (I 2 = 28.3%, P = .248). In MMP-7 and MMP-9, the heterogeneities were obvious (I 2 = 99.2% ( P = .000) and I 2 = 77.9% ( P = .000), respectively). The pooled HRs and 95% CIs of RFS were calculated with fixed-effects models (HR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.38–3.58, P = .001) and PFS (HR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.14–4.58, P = .035). Conclusions The results indicated that MMP overexpression was associated with shorter OS and RFS in cervical cancer patients. It suggested that MMP overexpression might be a poor prognostic marker in cervical cancer. Research Registry Registration Number: reviewregistry 1159.