The Twofold Approach to Children’s Freedom of Movement Rights Under European Law: Can ‘Children’s Equilibrium’ Guide the Interpretation of the Post-Brexit Rights of UK Children Residing in the EU?

The United Kingdom’s decision to leave the EU is causing a strong political, legal and, last but not least, social turmoil. Arguably, the impact is even greater for children who are growing up as part of the Union, and belong to families of mixed nationalities, and/or have cross-border relations to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teodora Mariova Petrova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2018-12-01
Series:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Subjects:
eu
Online Access:https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/312
id doaj-82f497ef5dc946768d90d07835fcbff6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82f497ef5dc946768d90d07835fcbff62020-11-25T03:03:53ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of LawCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy1845-56621848-99582018-12-01149913310.3935/cyelp.14.2018.308The Twofold Approach to Children’s Freedom of Movement Rights Under European Law: Can ‘Children’s Equilibrium’ Guide the Interpretation of the Post-Brexit Rights of UK Children Residing in the EU?Teodora Mariova Petrova0Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy MunichThe United Kingdom’s decision to leave the EU is causing a strong political, legal and, last but not least, social turmoil. Arguably, the impact is even greater for children who are growing up as part of the Union, and belong to families of mixed nationalities, and/or have cross-border relations to different states and educational systems. The interpretation of the post-Brexit EU law rights of children with British nationality should first examine the pre-Brexit children’s rights under the European freedom of movement law to assess the exact scope of the change that the removal of European citizenship will entail. An overview of the case law of the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) on the freedom of movement rights demonstrates an evolution in the understanding of the rights of children under EU law, a development which observes more and more children’s specific needs, as embodied in children’s fundamental rights provisions. This development came about in a sporadic fashion, shifting between treating children’s rights as ancillary add-ons to their parents’ EU law market rights and acknowledging children’s individual rights. Eventually, the ECJ attempted to reinforce the latter approach by examining children’s Union citizenship and rights under EU law by referencing children’s fundamental rights, enshrined in Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, for the sake of maintaining “children’s equilibrium”. The referring to the so-called ‘“children’s equilibrium”’ would suggest that a respective child-related approach was adopted in the interpretation of European law via which the stated equilibrium could be achieved. Yet, apart from the inclusion of Article 24 in the legal discussion, the development of a comprehensive child-related approach with a view to the securing of children’s equilibrium requires further judicial engagement in two main directions. Namely, the need for more guidance remains, especially along the lines of elaborating the EU’s uniform children’s rights obligations and making sure that children are seen as individual rights holders. On the basis of these existing criteria, for the purpose of this paper a child-related approach is to indicate the consideration and integration of children’s rights in the legal reasoning, by regarding children as independent rights-bearing individuals. The paper will argue that the upcoming legal uncertainties could be levelled down if the goal of maintaining children’s equilibrium through the child-related approach was applied in the interpretation of the EU law-related rights of children with British nationality. Further, since the proposed approach could also be based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child, it could also serve as a bridge for the application of the “children’s equilibrium” approach in the UK with a view to a time when the Charter is not to be applicable any longer.https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/312united kingdombrexiteuchildrenrightscitizenshipeuropean court of justicefreedom of movementcharter of fundamental rights“children’s equilibrium”
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Teodora Mariova Petrova
spellingShingle Teodora Mariova Petrova
The Twofold Approach to Children’s Freedom of Movement Rights Under European Law: Can ‘Children’s Equilibrium’ Guide the Interpretation of the Post-Brexit Rights of UK Children Residing in the EU?
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
united kingdom
brexit
eu
children
rights
citizenship
european court of justice
freedom of movement
charter of fundamental rights
“children’s equilibrium”
author_facet Teodora Mariova Petrova
author_sort Teodora Mariova Petrova
title The Twofold Approach to Children’s Freedom of Movement Rights Under European Law: Can ‘Children’s Equilibrium’ Guide the Interpretation of the Post-Brexit Rights of UK Children Residing in the EU?
title_short The Twofold Approach to Children’s Freedom of Movement Rights Under European Law: Can ‘Children’s Equilibrium’ Guide the Interpretation of the Post-Brexit Rights of UK Children Residing in the EU?
title_full The Twofold Approach to Children’s Freedom of Movement Rights Under European Law: Can ‘Children’s Equilibrium’ Guide the Interpretation of the Post-Brexit Rights of UK Children Residing in the EU?
title_fullStr The Twofold Approach to Children’s Freedom of Movement Rights Under European Law: Can ‘Children’s Equilibrium’ Guide the Interpretation of the Post-Brexit Rights of UK Children Residing in the EU?
title_full_unstemmed The Twofold Approach to Children’s Freedom of Movement Rights Under European Law: Can ‘Children’s Equilibrium’ Guide the Interpretation of the Post-Brexit Rights of UK Children Residing in the EU?
title_sort twofold approach to children’s freedom of movement rights under european law: can ‘children’s equilibrium’ guide the interpretation of the post-brexit rights of uk children residing in the eu?
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
series Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
issn 1845-5662
1848-9958
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The United Kingdom’s decision to leave the EU is causing a strong political, legal and, last but not least, social turmoil. Arguably, the impact is even greater for children who are growing up as part of the Union, and belong to families of mixed nationalities, and/or have cross-border relations to different states and educational systems. The interpretation of the post-Brexit EU law rights of children with British nationality should first examine the pre-Brexit children’s rights under the European freedom of movement law to assess the exact scope of the change that the removal of European citizenship will entail. An overview of the case law of the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) on the freedom of movement rights demonstrates an evolution in the understanding of the rights of children under EU law, a development which observes more and more children’s specific needs, as embodied in children’s fundamental rights provisions. This development came about in a sporadic fashion, shifting between treating children’s rights as ancillary add-ons to their parents’ EU law market rights and acknowledging children’s individual rights. Eventually, the ECJ attempted to reinforce the latter approach by examining children’s Union citizenship and rights under EU law by referencing children’s fundamental rights, enshrined in Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, for the sake of maintaining “children’s equilibrium”. The referring to the so-called ‘“children’s equilibrium”’ would suggest that a respective child-related approach was adopted in the interpretation of European law via which the stated equilibrium could be achieved. Yet, apart from the inclusion of Article 24 in the legal discussion, the development of a comprehensive child-related approach with a view to the securing of children’s equilibrium requires further judicial engagement in two main directions. Namely, the need for more guidance remains, especially along the lines of elaborating the EU’s uniform children’s rights obligations and making sure that children are seen as individual rights holders. On the basis of these existing criteria, for the purpose of this paper a child-related approach is to indicate the consideration and integration of children’s rights in the legal reasoning, by regarding children as independent rights-bearing individuals. The paper will argue that the upcoming legal uncertainties could be levelled down if the goal of maintaining children’s equilibrium through the child-related approach was applied in the interpretation of the EU law-related rights of children with British nationality. Further, since the proposed approach could also be based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child, it could also serve as a bridge for the application of the “children’s equilibrium” approach in the UK with a view to a time when the Charter is not to be applicable any longer.
topic united kingdom
brexit
eu
children
rights
citizenship
european court of justice
freedom of movement
charter of fundamental rights
“children’s equilibrium”
url https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/312
work_keys_str_mv AT teodoramariovapetrova thetwofoldapproachtochildrensfreedomofmovementrightsundereuropeanlawcanchildrensequilibriumguidetheinterpretationofthepostbrexitrightsofukchildrenresidingintheeu
AT teodoramariovapetrova twofoldapproachtochildrensfreedomofmovementrightsundereuropeanlawcanchildrensequilibriumguidetheinterpretationofthepostbrexitrightsofukchildrenresidingintheeu
_version_ 1724684089630392320