Role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injection

Background and Objectives : Pain following intravenous injection of propofol continues to be an intriguing problem. None of the commonly used methods completely attenuate the pain. Inflammatory response to propofol contributes to the pain. Role of hydrocortisone in attenuating pain has not been eval...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monu Yadav, Padmaja Durga, R Gopinath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2011;volume=27;issue=4;spage=470;epage=474;aulast=Yadav
id doaj-82f3660a8f2047b4aec88a0a1a474e47
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82f3660a8f2047b4aec88a0a1a474e472020-11-25T01:21:12ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852011-01-0127447047410.4103/0970-9185.86582Role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injectionMonu YadavPadmaja DurgaR GopinathBackground and Objectives : Pain following intravenous injection of propofol continues to be an intriguing problem. None of the commonly used methods completely attenuate the pain. Inflammatory response to propofol contributes to the pain. Role of hydrocortisone in attenuating pain has not been evaluated. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of lignocaine and hydrocortisone in attenuation of pain following intravenous injection of propofol. Materials and Methods : A prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 72 adult patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled to undergo elective surgery. They were randomly assigned to four groups of 18 each. Group NS, group LG, group HC10, and group HC25. The groups received 2 ml normal saline, 2 ml 2% lignocaine, 10 mg/2 ml hydrocortisone, and 25 mg/2 ml hydrocortisone, respectively, as pretreatment. Propofol was injected 30 sec later. A blinded researcher assessed the patient′s pain level using a four point verbal rating scale. Results : The four groups were comparable in respect to patient′s characteristics. There was no significant difference of hemodynamics changes during propofol induction between all the groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of pain between patients who received hydrocortisone and the placebo group. The incidence of pain was significantly less in group LG than other three groups. Conclusion : Use of intravenous low dose hydrocortisone pretreatment of the vein does not attenuate pain following propofol injection.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2011;volume=27;issue=4;spage=470;epage=474;aulast=YadavHydrocortisoneinjection painpropofolsteroids
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monu Yadav
Padmaja Durga
R Gopinath
spellingShingle Monu Yadav
Padmaja Durga
R Gopinath
Role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injection
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Hydrocortisone
injection pain
propofol
steroids
author_facet Monu Yadav
Padmaja Durga
R Gopinath
author_sort Monu Yadav
title Role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injection
title_short Role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injection
title_full Role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injection
title_fullStr Role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injection
title_full_unstemmed Role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injection
title_sort role of hydrocortisone in prevention of pain on propofol injection
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
issn 0970-9185
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Background and Objectives : Pain following intravenous injection of propofol continues to be an intriguing problem. None of the commonly used methods completely attenuate the pain. Inflammatory response to propofol contributes to the pain. Role of hydrocortisone in attenuating pain has not been evaluated. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of lignocaine and hydrocortisone in attenuation of pain following intravenous injection of propofol. Materials and Methods : A prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 72 adult patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled to undergo elective surgery. They were randomly assigned to four groups of 18 each. Group NS, group LG, group HC10, and group HC25. The groups received 2 ml normal saline, 2 ml 2% lignocaine, 10 mg/2 ml hydrocortisone, and 25 mg/2 ml hydrocortisone, respectively, as pretreatment. Propofol was injected 30 sec later. A blinded researcher assessed the patient′s pain level using a four point verbal rating scale. Results : The four groups were comparable in respect to patient′s characteristics. There was no significant difference of hemodynamics changes during propofol induction between all the groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of pain between patients who received hydrocortisone and the placebo group. The incidence of pain was significantly less in group LG than other three groups. Conclusion : Use of intravenous low dose hydrocortisone pretreatment of the vein does not attenuate pain following propofol injection.
topic Hydrocortisone
injection pain
propofol
steroids
url http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2011;volume=27;issue=4;spage=470;epage=474;aulast=Yadav
work_keys_str_mv AT monuyadav roleofhydrocortisoneinpreventionofpainonpropofolinjection
AT padmajadurga roleofhydrocortisoneinpreventionofpainonpropofolinjection
AT rgopinath roleofhydrocortisoneinpreventionofpainonpropofolinjection
_version_ 1725131658433134592