AMEE MedEdPublish Version 2 Launch Editorial

AMEE MedEdPublish was launched two years ago as a new outlet for scholarship in medical education (Hays, 2016). The on-line journal format broke new ground in a context where the proportion of papers submitted to medical education journals achieving publication was falling sharply.  All academic jou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard Hays
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) 2018-07-01
Series:MedEdPublish
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/1740
id doaj-82f191f430414343819b173f47354a99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82f191f430414343819b173f47354a992020-11-25T01:18:27ZengAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)MedEdPublish2312-79962018-07-0173AMEE MedEdPublish Version 2 Launch EditorialRichard Hays0University of TasmaniaAMEE MedEdPublish was launched two years ago as a new outlet for scholarship in medical education (Hays, 2016). The on-line journal format broke new ground in a context where the proportion of papers submitted to medical education journals achieving publication was falling sharply.  All academic journals face challenges obtaining sufficient reviews to make sound judgements about the quality of the scholarship. Indeed, a substantial proportion of submitted papers are now rejected prior to reviews being invited. Further, while review processes are becoming increasingly open, concerns remain about the potential for various forms of bias in reviews (Smith, 2006). Authors may be confused with editorial decisions to reject manuscripts, despite positive peer reviews. These potential helpful trails of original submission, reviews, feedback, discussion and revision are generally hidden from the readership. MedEdPublish has taken the approach of conducting initial, ‘light touch’ reviewing by editors, rapid on-line publication and facilitating open, ‘live’ discussion between reviewers, authors and the general readership on the strengths and weaknesses of each paper. Two years after implementation, it is timely to review the initial phase, explain the revised editorial management process and provide information about the software that is being introduced with this issue. https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/1740AMEE MedEdPublishOpening Editorial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard Hays
spellingShingle Richard Hays
AMEE MedEdPublish Version 2 Launch Editorial
MedEdPublish
AMEE MedEdPublish
Opening Editorial
author_facet Richard Hays
author_sort Richard Hays
title AMEE MedEdPublish Version 2 Launch Editorial
title_short AMEE MedEdPublish Version 2 Launch Editorial
title_full AMEE MedEdPublish Version 2 Launch Editorial
title_fullStr AMEE MedEdPublish Version 2 Launch Editorial
title_full_unstemmed AMEE MedEdPublish Version 2 Launch Editorial
title_sort amee mededpublish version 2 launch editorial
publisher Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
series MedEdPublish
issn 2312-7996
publishDate 2018-07-01
description AMEE MedEdPublish was launched two years ago as a new outlet for scholarship in medical education (Hays, 2016). The on-line journal format broke new ground in a context where the proportion of papers submitted to medical education journals achieving publication was falling sharply.  All academic journals face challenges obtaining sufficient reviews to make sound judgements about the quality of the scholarship. Indeed, a substantial proportion of submitted papers are now rejected prior to reviews being invited. Further, while review processes are becoming increasingly open, concerns remain about the potential for various forms of bias in reviews (Smith, 2006). Authors may be confused with editorial decisions to reject manuscripts, despite positive peer reviews. These potential helpful trails of original submission, reviews, feedback, discussion and revision are generally hidden from the readership. MedEdPublish has taken the approach of conducting initial, ‘light touch’ reviewing by editors, rapid on-line publication and facilitating open, ‘live’ discussion between reviewers, authors and the general readership on the strengths and weaknesses of each paper. Two years after implementation, it is timely to review the initial phase, explain the revised editorial management process and provide information about the software that is being introduced with this issue.
topic AMEE MedEdPublish
Opening Editorial
url https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/1740
work_keys_str_mv AT richardhays ameemededpublishversion2launcheditorial
_version_ 1725142471596310528