Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits

Gut development is stimulated by exposure to microorganisms, especially early-life microbial exposure. This study aimed to investigate whether doe-litter separation, which is performed in many rabbit farms, affects this exposure and therefore inhibits the development of intestinal system in suckling...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yukun Zhang, Hongxiao Cui, Defa Sun, Lihui Liu, Xiurong Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitat Politècnica de València 2018-03-01
Series:World Rabbit Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/wrs/article/view/5917
id doaj-82ee8c4c93de43038e7775e04a01b257
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82ee8c4c93de43038e7775e04a01b2572020-11-25T03:15:02ZengUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaWorld Rabbit Science1257-50111989-88862018-03-01261717910.4995/wrs.2018.59176693Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbitsYukun Zhang0Hongxiao Cui1Defa Sun2Lihui Liu3Xiurong Xu4Northwest A&F UniversityNorthwest A&F UniversityNovus International Trading (Shanghai) Co. LtdNorthwest A&F UniversityNorthwest A&f UniversityGut development is stimulated by exposure to microorganisms, especially early-life microbial exposure. This study aimed to investigate whether doe-litter separation, which is performed in many rabbit farms, affects this exposure and therefore inhibits the development of intestinal system in suckling rabbits. Immediately after parturition, Rex rabbit does (n=16) were adjusted to 8 kits per litter and divided into doe-litter separation (DLS) group and doe-litter together (DLT) group based on the conditions of the does. One healthy kit per litter was selected and sacrificed at 7 d, 14 d, 21 d and 28 d of age, and the number of total bacteria, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides-Prevotella, expression of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 10 (IL-10) in duodenum and caecum were investigated by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The morphological parameters of duodenum and vermiform appendix were also measured. Our results showed that doe-litter separation affected the number of intestinal bacteria. At 7 d of age, except for caecal Escherichia coli, the number of the investigated bacteria was decreased by doe-litter separation (P<0.05). But 1 wk later, only the number of total bacteria and Bacteroides-Prevotella in caecal content (P<0.05) and Escherichia coli in duodenal content from DLS kits (P<0.05) were still lower than those from DLT kits. After being provided with supplementary food for 7 d, DLS kits had fewer total bacteria in caecal content (P<0.05) and fewer E. coli in duodenal content (P<0.01) than DLT kits. After growing to 28 d of age, kits in DLS group still tended to have fewer total bacteria in caecal content, and expression of IL-10 and secretion of secretory IgA (sIgA) in vermiform appendix in DLS group was obviously lower than kits in DLT group (P<0.05). The villus height:crypt depth ratio in duodenum at 3rd wk and 4th wk was decreased by DLS (P<0.05). Kits in DLS group had shorter villus height (P<0.05), higher crypt depth (P<0.05) and shorter vermiform appendix (P<0.05) at the end of the trial. Furthermore, separating kits from the doe had a negative effect on their average daily gain at 3rd wk and 4th wk (P<0.05). Limiting the microbiological contact with the mother during suckling period affected the kits’ intestinal flora and could negatively affect the development of intestinal digestive and immune system and growth performance of kits.https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/wrs/article/view/5917doe-litter separationsuckling rabbitgut developmentbacteroidinterleukin 6sIgA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yukun Zhang
Hongxiao Cui
Defa Sun
Lihui Liu
Xiurong Xu
spellingShingle Yukun Zhang
Hongxiao Cui
Defa Sun
Lihui Liu
Xiurong Xu
Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits
World Rabbit Science
doe-litter separation
suckling rabbit
gut development
bacteroid
interleukin 6
sIgA
author_facet Yukun Zhang
Hongxiao Cui
Defa Sun
Lihui Liu
Xiurong Xu
author_sort Yukun Zhang
title Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits
title_short Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits
title_full Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits
title_fullStr Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits
title_sort effects of doe-litter separation on intestinal bacteria, immune response and morphology of suckling rabbits
publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
series World Rabbit Science
issn 1257-5011
1989-8886
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Gut development is stimulated by exposure to microorganisms, especially early-life microbial exposure. This study aimed to investigate whether doe-litter separation, which is performed in many rabbit farms, affects this exposure and therefore inhibits the development of intestinal system in suckling rabbits. Immediately after parturition, Rex rabbit does (n=16) were adjusted to 8 kits per litter and divided into doe-litter separation (DLS) group and doe-litter together (DLT) group based on the conditions of the does. One healthy kit per litter was selected and sacrificed at 7 d, 14 d, 21 d and 28 d of age, and the number of total bacteria, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides-Prevotella, expression of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 10 (IL-10) in duodenum and caecum were investigated by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The morphological parameters of duodenum and vermiform appendix were also measured. Our results showed that doe-litter separation affected the number of intestinal bacteria. At 7 d of age, except for caecal Escherichia coli, the number of the investigated bacteria was decreased by doe-litter separation (P<0.05). But 1 wk later, only the number of total bacteria and Bacteroides-Prevotella in caecal content (P<0.05) and Escherichia coli in duodenal content from DLS kits (P<0.05) were still lower than those from DLT kits. After being provided with supplementary food for 7 d, DLS kits had fewer total bacteria in caecal content (P<0.05) and fewer E. coli in duodenal content (P<0.01) than DLT kits. After growing to 28 d of age, kits in DLS group still tended to have fewer total bacteria in caecal content, and expression of IL-10 and secretion of secretory IgA (sIgA) in vermiform appendix in DLS group was obviously lower than kits in DLT group (P<0.05). The villus height:crypt depth ratio in duodenum at 3rd wk and 4th wk was decreased by DLS (P<0.05). Kits in DLS group had shorter villus height (P<0.05), higher crypt depth (P<0.05) and shorter vermiform appendix (P<0.05) at the end of the trial. Furthermore, separating kits from the doe had a negative effect on their average daily gain at 3rd wk and 4th wk (P<0.05). Limiting the microbiological contact with the mother during suckling period affected the kits’ intestinal flora and could negatively affect the development of intestinal digestive and immune system and growth performance of kits.
topic doe-litter separation
suckling rabbit
gut development
bacteroid
interleukin 6
sIgA
url https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/wrs/article/view/5917
work_keys_str_mv AT yukunzhang effectsofdoelitterseparationonintestinalbacteriaimmuneresponseandmorphologyofsucklingrabbits
AT hongxiaocui effectsofdoelitterseparationonintestinalbacteriaimmuneresponseandmorphologyofsucklingrabbits
AT defasun effectsofdoelitterseparationonintestinalbacteriaimmuneresponseandmorphologyofsucklingrabbits
AT lihuiliu effectsofdoelitterseparationonintestinalbacteriaimmuneresponseandmorphologyofsucklingrabbits
AT xiurongxu effectsofdoelitterseparationonintestinalbacteriaimmuneresponseandmorphologyofsucklingrabbits
_version_ 1724640852827963392