Changing Management of Clinical Low-Stage Testicular Cancer

Stage I and II testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are almost always cured with appropriate treatment and most ongoing research regarding these tumors focuses on minimizing treatment toxicity. The management of clinical stage I testicular GCTs has grown more complicated due to the emergence of a brie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Timothy Gilligan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2005-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.97
id doaj-82e61b664f734e4a911a8080e83de869
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82e61b664f734e4a911a8080e83de8692020-11-25T01:27:27ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2005-01-01585286710.1100/tsw.2005.97Changing Management of Clinical Low-Stage Testicular CancerTimothy Gilligan0Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USAStage I and II testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are almost always cured with appropriate treatment and most ongoing research regarding these tumors focuses on minimizing treatment toxicity. The management of clinical stage I testicular GCTs has grown more complicated due to the emergence of a brief course of chemotherapy as an additional treatment option for stage I seminomas and stage I nonseminomas. In addition, growing concern about radiation-induced cancers and other late toxicity has dulled enthusiasm for radiotherapy as a treatment for stage I seminomas. However, recent randomized trials have shown that radiotherapy doses and field sizes can be lowered without compromising cure rates and it is possible that this reduction in radiation exposure will reduce the rate of secondary cancers. At this point in history, stage I patients have three treatment options following radical orchiectomy: adjuvant (sometimes called “primary”) chemotherapy (carboplatin for seminomas and the combined regimen of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin for nonseminomas), surveillance, and either retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (for nonseminomas) or radiotherapy (for pure seminomas). Clinical studies have made it possible to identify subgroups of patients at high and low risk for relapse and this has made it possible to tailor treatment decisions to the individual patient's postorchiectomy relapse risk.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.97
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Timothy Gilligan
spellingShingle Timothy Gilligan
Changing Management of Clinical Low-Stage Testicular Cancer
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Timothy Gilligan
author_sort Timothy Gilligan
title Changing Management of Clinical Low-Stage Testicular Cancer
title_short Changing Management of Clinical Low-Stage Testicular Cancer
title_full Changing Management of Clinical Low-Stage Testicular Cancer
title_fullStr Changing Management of Clinical Low-Stage Testicular Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Changing Management of Clinical Low-Stage Testicular Cancer
title_sort changing management of clinical low-stage testicular cancer
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2005-01-01
description Stage I and II testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are almost always cured with appropriate treatment and most ongoing research regarding these tumors focuses on minimizing treatment toxicity. The management of clinical stage I testicular GCTs has grown more complicated due to the emergence of a brief course of chemotherapy as an additional treatment option for stage I seminomas and stage I nonseminomas. In addition, growing concern about radiation-induced cancers and other late toxicity has dulled enthusiasm for radiotherapy as a treatment for stage I seminomas. However, recent randomized trials have shown that radiotherapy doses and field sizes can be lowered without compromising cure rates and it is possible that this reduction in radiation exposure will reduce the rate of secondary cancers. At this point in history, stage I patients have three treatment options following radical orchiectomy: adjuvant (sometimes called “primary”) chemotherapy (carboplatin for seminomas and the combined regimen of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin for nonseminomas), surveillance, and either retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (for nonseminomas) or radiotherapy (for pure seminomas). Clinical studies have made it possible to identify subgroups of patients at high and low risk for relapse and this has made it possible to tailor treatment decisions to the individual patient's postorchiectomy relapse risk.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.97
work_keys_str_mv AT timothygilligan changingmanagementofclinicallowstagetesticularcancer
_version_ 1725105463390896128