Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Retrograde ("fundus first") dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it has not been widely practiced. LC is most simply carried out using antegrade di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kelly Michael D
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/19
id doaj-82e4d3479d99462aadee730582ccb17a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82e4d3479d99462aadee730582ccb17a2020-11-24T23:55:16ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822009-12-01911910.1186/1471-2482-9-19Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomyKelly Michael D<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Retrograde ("fundus first") dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it has not been widely practiced. LC is most simply carried out using antegrade dissection with a grasper to provide cephalad fundic traction. A series is presented to investigate the place of retrograde dissection in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon using modern instrumentation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A prospective record of all LCs carried out by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon following his appointment in Bristol in 2004 was examined. Retrograde dissection was resorted to when difficulties were encountered with exposure and/or dissection of Calot's triangle.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>1041 LCs were carried out including 148 (14%) emergency operations and 131 (13%) associated bile duct explorations. There were no bile duct injuries although conversion to open operation was required in six patients (0.6%). Retrograde LC was attempted successfully in 11 patients (1.1%). The age ranged from 28 to 80 years (mean 61) and there were 7 males. Indications were; fibrous, contracted gallbladder 7, Mirizzi syndrome 2 and severe kyphosis 2. Operative photographs are included to show the type of case where it was needed and the technique used. Postoperative stay was 1/2 to 5 days (mean 2.2) with no delayed sequelae on followup. Histopathology showed; chronic cholecystitis 7, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis 3 and acute necrotising cholecystitis 1.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In this series, retrograde laparoscopic dissection was necessary in 1.1% of LCs and a liver retractor was needed in 9 of the 11 cases. This technique does have a place and should be in the armamentarium of the laparoscopic surgeon.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/19
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kelly Michael D
spellingShingle Kelly Michael D
Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
BMC Surgery
author_facet Kelly Michael D
author_sort Kelly Michael D
title Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_short Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_full Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
title_sort laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy
publisher BMC
series BMC Surgery
issn 1471-2482
publishDate 2009-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Retrograde ("fundus first") dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) it has not been widely practiced. LC is most simply carried out using antegrade dissection with a grasper to provide cephalad fundic traction. A series is presented to investigate the place of retrograde dissection in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon using modern instrumentation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A prospective record of all LCs carried out by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon following his appointment in Bristol in 2004 was examined. Retrograde dissection was resorted to when difficulties were encountered with exposure and/or dissection of Calot's triangle.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>1041 LCs were carried out including 148 (14%) emergency operations and 131 (13%) associated bile duct explorations. There were no bile duct injuries although conversion to open operation was required in six patients (0.6%). Retrograde LC was attempted successfully in 11 patients (1.1%). The age ranged from 28 to 80 years (mean 61) and there were 7 males. Indications were; fibrous, contracted gallbladder 7, Mirizzi syndrome 2 and severe kyphosis 2. Operative photographs are included to show the type of case where it was needed and the technique used. Postoperative stay was 1/2 to 5 days (mean 2.2) with no delayed sequelae on followup. Histopathology showed; chronic cholecystitis 7, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis 3 and acute necrotising cholecystitis 1.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In this series, retrograde laparoscopic dissection was necessary in 1.1% of LCs and a liver retractor was needed in 9 of the 11 cases. This technique does have a place and should be in the armamentarium of the laparoscopic surgeon.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/9/19
work_keys_str_mv AT kellymichaeld laparoscopicretrogradefundusfirstcholecystectomy
_version_ 1725463259647049728