A Description of Medication Therapy Management Services in Minnesota

Objective:  To describe Medication Therapy Management (MTM) services in Minnesota, quantifying how many patient encountersoccur per week and compiling provider and practice site characteristics.Design:  Cross‐sectional study.Setting:  Minnesota practice sites surveyed in June and July 2010.Participa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amie Jo Digatono, Pharm.D. Candidat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2011-01-01
Series:INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pharmacy.umn.edu/innovations/prod/groups/cop/@pub/@cop/@innov/documents/article/cop_article_317765.pdf
id doaj-82d0d12e06cf4ed993838b6126b2c056
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82d0d12e06cf4ed993838b6126b2c0562020-11-24T22:33:30ZengUniversity of Minnesota Libraries PublishingINNOVATIONS in Pharmacy2155-04172011-01-012134A Description of Medication Therapy Management Services in MinnesotaAmie Jo Digatono, Pharm.D. CandidatObjective:  To describe Medication Therapy Management (MTM) services in Minnesota, quantifying how many patient encountersoccur per week and compiling provider and practice site characteristics.Design:  Cross‐sectional study.Setting:  Minnesota practice sites surveyed in June and July 2010.Participants:  MTM providers in Minnesota who are registered users of the Assurance®documentation system or are members of theMinnesota Pharmacists Association MTM Academy.  Intervention:  Self‐administered online questionnaire completed by study participants.Main Outcome Measures: The number of patient encounters per week, practice site location, practitioner length of time as a MTMservice provider, and the motivating factors for providing direct patient care services.  Results:  There were 56 respondents, reporting a median of 5 MTM patient encounters per week (range 0 to 35) and a median lengthof service of 4 years (range <1 to 15).  Clinic‐based practices were reported by 66% of providers and community pharmacy‐basedpractices by 30%.  Eighty‐five percent practice in an urban setting, 9% in a large rural town and 6% in a small rural town.  Nearly half(46%) of providers are the sole practitioner at their site.  The most commonly cited motivation for providing direct patient careservices was to improve patient outcomes.Conclusion:  MTM service providers in Minnesota were more likely to report practicing in an urban area and in a clinic.  Manypractices were low‐volume or newly established, with half of all respondents reporting 5 or fewer MTM patient encounters per weekand a length of service of four years or less.   http://www.pharmacy.umn.edu/innovations/prod/groups/cop/@pub/@cop/@innov/documents/article/cop_article_317765.pdfmedication therapy managementMinnesotasurveyambulatory pharmacyrural pharmacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amie Jo Digatono, Pharm.D. Candidat
spellingShingle Amie Jo Digatono, Pharm.D. Candidat
A Description of Medication Therapy Management Services in Minnesota
INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
medication therapy management
Minnesota
survey
ambulatory pharmacy
rural pharmacy
author_facet Amie Jo Digatono, Pharm.D. Candidat
author_sort Amie Jo Digatono, Pharm.D. Candidat
title A Description of Medication Therapy Management Services in Minnesota
title_short A Description of Medication Therapy Management Services in Minnesota
title_full A Description of Medication Therapy Management Services in Minnesota
title_fullStr A Description of Medication Therapy Management Services in Minnesota
title_full_unstemmed A Description of Medication Therapy Management Services in Minnesota
title_sort description of medication therapy management services in minnesota
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
series INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
issn 2155-0417
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Objective:  To describe Medication Therapy Management (MTM) services in Minnesota, quantifying how many patient encountersoccur per week and compiling provider and practice site characteristics.Design:  Cross‐sectional study.Setting:  Minnesota practice sites surveyed in June and July 2010.Participants:  MTM providers in Minnesota who are registered users of the Assurance®documentation system or are members of theMinnesota Pharmacists Association MTM Academy.  Intervention:  Self‐administered online questionnaire completed by study participants.Main Outcome Measures: The number of patient encounters per week, practice site location, practitioner length of time as a MTMservice provider, and the motivating factors for providing direct patient care services.  Results:  There were 56 respondents, reporting a median of 5 MTM patient encounters per week (range 0 to 35) and a median lengthof service of 4 years (range <1 to 15).  Clinic‐based practices were reported by 66% of providers and community pharmacy‐basedpractices by 30%.  Eighty‐five percent practice in an urban setting, 9% in a large rural town and 6% in a small rural town.  Nearly half(46%) of providers are the sole practitioner at their site.  The most commonly cited motivation for providing direct patient careservices was to improve patient outcomes.Conclusion:  MTM service providers in Minnesota were more likely to report practicing in an urban area and in a clinic.  Manypractices were low‐volume or newly established, with half of all respondents reporting 5 or fewer MTM patient encounters per weekand a length of service of four years or less.   
topic medication therapy management
Minnesota
survey
ambulatory pharmacy
rural pharmacy
url http://www.pharmacy.umn.edu/innovations/prod/groups/cop/@pub/@cop/@innov/documents/article/cop_article_317765.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT amiejodigatonopharmdcandidat adescriptionofmedicationtherapymanagementservicesinminnesota
AT amiejodigatonopharmdcandidat descriptionofmedicationtherapymanagementservicesinminnesota
_version_ 1725730679181803520