Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery
Background: Cataract surgery can be performed with different methods of local anaesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the pain score and analgesia with sub-conjunctival versus peribulbar anaesthesia. Material & Methods: This comparative study was conducted on patients for cataract surg...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Gomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, Pakistan
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences |
Online Access: | http://gjms.com.pk/ojs24/index.php/gjms/article/view/355 |
id |
doaj-82c5fdd881134973858485c8e5f81c8a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-82c5fdd881134973858485c8e5f81c8a2020-11-25T01:43:47ZengGomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, PakistanGomal Journal of Medical Sciences1819-79731997-20672010-12-0191308Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract SurgeryMuhammad AlamMuhammad SaleemBackground: Cataract surgery can be performed with different methods of local anaesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the pain score and analgesia with sub-conjunctival versus peribulbar anaesthesia. Material & Methods: This comparative study was conducted on patients for cataract surgery from March 2010 to December 2010. One hundred and thirty consecutive patients with age related cataract were included in the study. They were divided in two groups A and B each with 65 patients. In group A subconjunctival 2% lidocaine mixed with adrenaline, while in group B 2% lidocaine mixed with adrenaline was given peribulbar. The results of the two groups regarding analgesia were compared using x2 test. Results: Among 130 patients, 62(47.7%) were males and 68(52.3%) females. In group A, 57(87.7%) patients had 0 pain score, 2(3.1%) score 1, 1(1.5%) patients score 2, 2(3.1%) score 3 and 3(4.6%) had score 4. In group B, 55(84.6%) patients has score 0, 5(7.7%) score 1, 3(4.6%) score 2 and 2(3.1%) score 4. The difference between the analgesic effect of the two methods was found to be statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both the types of local anesthesia i.e. sub-conjunctival and peribulbar are comparable regarding analgesia.http://gjms.com.pk/ojs24/index.php/gjms/article/view/355 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Muhammad Alam Muhammad Saleem |
spellingShingle |
Muhammad Alam Muhammad Saleem Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences |
author_facet |
Muhammad Alam Muhammad Saleem |
author_sort |
Muhammad Alam |
title |
Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery |
title_short |
Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery |
title_full |
Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery |
title_fullStr |
Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery |
title_sort |
sub conjunctival versus peribulbar local anaesthesia in cataract surgery |
publisher |
Gomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, Pakistan |
series |
Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences |
issn |
1819-7973 1997-2067 |
publishDate |
2010-12-01 |
description |
Background: Cataract surgery can be performed with different methods of local anaesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the pain score and analgesia with sub-conjunctival versus peribulbar anaesthesia.
Material & Methods: This comparative study was conducted on patients for cataract surgery from March 2010 to December 2010. One hundred and thirty consecutive patients with age related cataract were included in the study. They were divided in two groups A and B each with 65 patients. In group A subconjunctival 2% lidocaine mixed with adrenaline, while in group B 2% lidocaine mixed with adrenaline was given peribulbar. The results of the two groups regarding analgesia were compared using x2 test.
Results: Among 130 patients, 62(47.7%) were males and 68(52.3%) females. In group A, 57(87.7%) patients had 0 pain score, 2(3.1%) score 1, 1(1.5%) patients score 2, 2(3.1%) score 3 and 3(4.6%) had score 4. In group B, 55(84.6%) patients has score 0, 5(7.7%) score 1, 3(4.6%) score 2 and 2(3.1%) score 4. The difference between the analgesic effect of the two methods was found to be statistically insignificant (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Both the types of local anesthesia i.e. sub-conjunctival and peribulbar are comparable regarding analgesia. |
url |
http://gjms.com.pk/ojs24/index.php/gjms/article/view/355 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT muhammadalam subconjunctivalversusperibulbarlocalanaesthesiaincataractsurgery AT muhammadsaleem subconjunctivalversusperibulbarlocalanaesthesiaincataractsurgery |
_version_ |
1725031578696941568 |