Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery

Background: Cataract surgery can be performed with different methods of local anaesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the pain score and analgesia with sub-conjunctival versus peribulbar anaesthesia. Material & Methods: This comparative study was conducted on patients for cataract surg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Alam, Muhammad Saleem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, Pakistan 2010-12-01
Series:Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences
Online Access:http://gjms.com.pk/ojs24/index.php/gjms/article/view/355
id doaj-82c5fdd881134973858485c8e5f81c8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82c5fdd881134973858485c8e5f81c8a2020-11-25T01:43:47ZengGomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, PakistanGomal Journal of Medical Sciences1819-79731997-20672010-12-0191308Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract SurgeryMuhammad AlamMuhammad SaleemBackground: Cataract surgery can be performed with different methods of local anaesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the pain score and analgesia with sub-conjunctival versus peribulbar anaesthesia. Material & Methods: This comparative study was conducted on patients for cataract surgery from March 2010 to December 2010. One hundred and thirty consecutive patients with age related cataract were included in the study. They were divided in two groups A and B each with 65 patients. In group A subconjunctival 2% lidocaine mixed with adrenaline, while in group B 2% lidocaine mixed with adrenaline was given peribulbar. The results of the two groups regarding analgesia were compared using x2 test. Results: Among 130 patients, 62(47.7%) were males and 68(52.3%) females. In group A, 57(87.7%) patients had 0 pain score, 2(3.1%) score 1, 1(1.5%) patients score 2, 2(3.1%) score 3 and 3(4.6%) had score 4. In group B, 55(84.6%) patients has score 0, 5(7.7%) score 1, 3(4.6%) score 2 and 2(3.1%) score 4. The difference between the analgesic effect of the two methods was found to be statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both the types of local anesthesia i.e. sub-conjunctival and peribulbar are comparable regarding analgesia.http://gjms.com.pk/ojs24/index.php/gjms/article/view/355
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Muhammad Alam
Muhammad Saleem
spellingShingle Muhammad Alam
Muhammad Saleem
Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery
Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences
author_facet Muhammad Alam
Muhammad Saleem
author_sort Muhammad Alam
title Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery
title_short Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery
title_full Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery
title_fullStr Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Sub Conjunctival versus Peribulbar Local Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgery
title_sort sub conjunctival versus peribulbar local anaesthesia in cataract surgery
publisher Gomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, Pakistan
series Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences
issn 1819-7973
1997-2067
publishDate 2010-12-01
description Background: Cataract surgery can be performed with different methods of local anaesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the pain score and analgesia with sub-conjunctival versus peribulbar anaesthesia. Material & Methods: This comparative study was conducted on patients for cataract surgery from March 2010 to December 2010. One hundred and thirty consecutive patients with age related cataract were included in the study. They were divided in two groups A and B each with 65 patients. In group A subconjunctival 2% lidocaine mixed with adrenaline, while in group B 2% lidocaine mixed with adrenaline was given peribulbar. The results of the two groups regarding analgesia were compared using x2 test. Results: Among 130 patients, 62(47.7%) were males and 68(52.3%) females. In group A, 57(87.7%) patients had 0 pain score, 2(3.1%) score 1, 1(1.5%) patients score 2, 2(3.1%) score 3 and 3(4.6%) had score 4. In group B, 55(84.6%) patients has score 0, 5(7.7%) score 1, 3(4.6%) score 2 and 2(3.1%) score 4. The difference between the analgesic effect of the two methods was found to be statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both the types of local anesthesia i.e. sub-conjunctival and peribulbar are comparable regarding analgesia.
url http://gjms.com.pk/ojs24/index.php/gjms/article/view/355
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadalam subconjunctivalversusperibulbarlocalanaesthesiaincataractsurgery
AT muhammadsaleem subconjunctivalversusperibulbarlocalanaesthesiaincataractsurgery
_version_ 1725031578696941568