Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure
Food web studies commonly ignore individual variation within a population and variation in the environment and assume these factors have insignificant effects on community dynamics relative to interspecific interactions. However, variation in body sizes within a population (size structure) and the p...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Freshwater Ecology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1435429 |
id |
doaj-82c473ccd29446abb2b851fb7fdfcd2c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-82c473ccd29446abb2b851fb7fdfcd2c2020-11-25T01:48:35ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Freshwater Ecology0270-50602156-69412018-01-0133123924910.1080/02705060.2018.14354291435429Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structureShannon K. Carter0Darrell Vodopich1Patrick W. Crumrine2Rice UniversityBaylor UniversityRowan UniversityFood web studies commonly ignore individual variation within a population and variation in the environment and assume these factors have insignificant effects on community dynamics relative to interspecific interactions. However, variation in body sizes within a population (size structure) and the physical structure of habitats (habitat complexity) can both affect interspecific interactions independently, with possible interactive effects. Using experimental mesocosms, we examined effects of predator size structure and habitat complexity on predation by two common predators in fishless ponds: larval aquatic beetles (Cybister fimbriolatus) and larval dragonflies (Anax junius). Cannibalism, intraguild predation, and predation on shared prey were measured at two levels of habitat complexity crossed with six size-structured pairs of predators. We found that highly complex habitats sustain a higher prey density because prey can take refuge from predators. Additionally, size structure had direct (size better predicted predation rate than did species identity) and indirect (IGP and cannibalism lowered predation rates) effects on consumptive interactions, which changed the composition and density of the predator guild. The identified size- and habitat-mediated mechanisms can change the frequencies of intraguild vs. interguild predation (a balance important in determining top–down control of predators), and therefore we argue that these sources of heterogeneity should be included in community ecology studies where possible.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1435429Size structureintraguild predationcannibalismcommunity structureAnax juniusCybister fimbriolatus |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shannon K. Carter Darrell Vodopich Patrick W. Crumrine |
spellingShingle |
Shannon K. Carter Darrell Vodopich Patrick W. Crumrine Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure Journal of Freshwater Ecology Size structure intraguild predation cannibalism community structure Anax junius Cybister fimbriolatus |
author_facet |
Shannon K. Carter Darrell Vodopich Patrick W. Crumrine |
author_sort |
Shannon K. Carter |
title |
Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure |
title_short |
Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure |
title_full |
Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure |
title_fullStr |
Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure |
title_sort |
heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Journal of Freshwater Ecology |
issn |
0270-5060 2156-6941 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Food web studies commonly ignore individual variation within a population and variation in the environment and assume these factors have insignificant effects on community dynamics relative to interspecific interactions. However, variation in body sizes within a population (size structure) and the physical structure of habitats (habitat complexity) can both affect interspecific interactions independently, with possible interactive effects. Using experimental mesocosms, we examined effects of predator size structure and habitat complexity on predation by two common predators in fishless ponds: larval aquatic beetles (Cybister fimbriolatus) and larval dragonflies (Anax junius). Cannibalism, intraguild predation, and predation on shared prey were measured at two levels of habitat complexity crossed with six size-structured pairs of predators. We found that highly complex habitats sustain a higher prey density because prey can take refuge from predators. Additionally, size structure had direct (size better predicted predation rate than did species identity) and indirect (IGP and cannibalism lowered predation rates) effects on consumptive interactions, which changed the composition and density of the predator guild. The identified size- and habitat-mediated mechanisms can change the frequencies of intraguild vs. interguild predation (a balance important in determining top–down control of predators), and therefore we argue that these sources of heterogeneity should be included in community ecology studies where possible. |
topic |
Size structure intraguild predation cannibalism community structure Anax junius Cybister fimbriolatus |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1435429 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shannonkcarter heterogeneityinbodysizeandhabitatcomplexityinfluencecommunitystructure AT darrellvodopich heterogeneityinbodysizeandhabitatcomplexityinfluencecommunitystructure AT patrickwcrumrine heterogeneityinbodysizeandhabitatcomplexityinfluencecommunitystructure |
_version_ |
1725011244115558400 |