Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure

Food web studies commonly ignore individual variation within a population and variation in the environment and assume these factors have insignificant effects on community dynamics relative to interspecific interactions. However, variation in body sizes within a population (size structure) and the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shannon K. Carter, Darrell Vodopich, Patrick W. Crumrine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Freshwater Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1435429
id doaj-82c473ccd29446abb2b851fb7fdfcd2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82c473ccd29446abb2b851fb7fdfcd2c2020-11-25T01:48:35ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Freshwater Ecology0270-50602156-69412018-01-0133123924910.1080/02705060.2018.14354291435429Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structureShannon K. Carter0Darrell Vodopich1Patrick W. Crumrine2Rice UniversityBaylor UniversityRowan UniversityFood web studies commonly ignore individual variation within a population and variation in the environment and assume these factors have insignificant effects on community dynamics relative to interspecific interactions. However, variation in body sizes within a population (size structure) and the physical structure of habitats (habitat complexity) can both affect interspecific interactions independently, with possible interactive effects. Using experimental mesocosms, we examined effects of predator size structure and habitat complexity on predation by two common predators in fishless ponds: larval aquatic beetles (Cybister fimbriolatus) and larval dragonflies (Anax junius). Cannibalism, intraguild predation, and predation on shared prey were measured at two levels of habitat complexity crossed with six size-structured pairs of predators. We found that highly complex habitats sustain a higher prey density because prey can take refuge from predators. Additionally, size structure had direct (size better predicted predation rate than did species identity) and indirect (IGP and cannibalism lowered predation rates) effects on consumptive interactions, which changed the composition and density of the predator guild. The identified size- and habitat-mediated mechanisms can change the frequencies of intraguild vs. interguild predation (a balance important in determining top–down control of predators), and therefore we argue that these sources of heterogeneity should be included in community ecology studies where possible.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1435429Size structureintraguild predationcannibalismcommunity structureAnax juniusCybister fimbriolatus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shannon K. Carter
Darrell Vodopich
Patrick W. Crumrine
spellingShingle Shannon K. Carter
Darrell Vodopich
Patrick W. Crumrine
Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure
Journal of Freshwater Ecology
Size structure
intraguild predation
cannibalism
community structure
Anax junius
Cybister fimbriolatus
author_facet Shannon K. Carter
Darrell Vodopich
Patrick W. Crumrine
author_sort Shannon K. Carter
title Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure
title_short Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure
title_full Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure
title_fullStr Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure
title_sort heterogeneity in body size and habitat complexity influence community structure
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal of Freshwater Ecology
issn 0270-5060
2156-6941
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Food web studies commonly ignore individual variation within a population and variation in the environment and assume these factors have insignificant effects on community dynamics relative to interspecific interactions. However, variation in body sizes within a population (size structure) and the physical structure of habitats (habitat complexity) can both affect interspecific interactions independently, with possible interactive effects. Using experimental mesocosms, we examined effects of predator size structure and habitat complexity on predation by two common predators in fishless ponds: larval aquatic beetles (Cybister fimbriolatus) and larval dragonflies (Anax junius). Cannibalism, intraguild predation, and predation on shared prey were measured at two levels of habitat complexity crossed with six size-structured pairs of predators. We found that highly complex habitats sustain a higher prey density because prey can take refuge from predators. Additionally, size structure had direct (size better predicted predation rate than did species identity) and indirect (IGP and cannibalism lowered predation rates) effects on consumptive interactions, which changed the composition and density of the predator guild. The identified size- and habitat-mediated mechanisms can change the frequencies of intraguild vs. interguild predation (a balance important in determining top–down control of predators), and therefore we argue that these sources of heterogeneity should be included in community ecology studies where possible.
topic Size structure
intraguild predation
cannibalism
community structure
Anax junius
Cybister fimbriolatus
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1435429
work_keys_str_mv AT shannonkcarter heterogeneityinbodysizeandhabitatcomplexityinfluencecommunitystructure
AT darrellvodopich heterogeneityinbodysizeandhabitatcomplexityinfluencecommunitystructure
AT patrickwcrumrine heterogeneityinbodysizeandhabitatcomplexityinfluencecommunitystructure
_version_ 1725011244115558400