Re-writing history: André Brink’s An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993)

This article analyses the two different approaches to history and its representation demonstrated in Brink’s novels An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993) in terms of a response to the controversial influence of postmodernism on the historical novel in South Africa today. Although the fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Louise Viljoen
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Scriber Editorial Systems 1995-01-01
Series:Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
Online Access:https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/644
id doaj-82c3b53e88e14d5fa8b567cf176be4d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82c3b53e88e14d5fa8b567cf176be4d22020-11-25T02:07:51ZafrScriber Editorial SystemsKoers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship0023-270X2304-85571995-01-0160410.4102/koers.v60i4.644Re-writing history: André Brink’s An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993)Louise Viljoen0Department of Afrikaans & Dutch University of Stellenbosch StellenboschThis article analyses the two different approaches to history and its representation demonstrated in Brink’s novels An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993) in terms of a response to the controversial influence of postmodernism on the historical novel in South Africa today. Although the first of these two novels, An Act of Terror, hints at the complexities of representation in historiography and fiction, it ultimately chooses against a postmodernist view of history, preferring to interpret and represent history in terms of an over-arching metanarrative and a stable subject because it facilitates effective political action. The article then argues that the second of these novels, On the Contrary, can be read as an affirmation of the postmodernist view o f history, especially when seen as an example of that variant of postmodernist historical fiction called “uchronian fiction” (Wesseling, 1991). Because uchronian fiction (the result of a cross-fertilization between historical fiction and science fiction) reconstructs the past in such as way as to propose possibilities for the transformation o f future societies, On the Contrary can also be read as a politically responsible novel, thus confirming the view that postmodernism has a political dimension.https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/644
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Louise Viljoen
spellingShingle Louise Viljoen
Re-writing history: André Brink’s An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993)
Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
author_facet Louise Viljoen
author_sort Louise Viljoen
title Re-writing history: André Brink’s An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993)
title_short Re-writing history: André Brink’s An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993)
title_full Re-writing history: André Brink’s An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993)
title_fullStr Re-writing history: André Brink’s An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993)
title_full_unstemmed Re-writing history: André Brink’s An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993)
title_sort re-writing history: andré brink’s an act of terror (1991) and on the contrary (1993)
publisher Scriber Editorial Systems
series Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
issn 0023-270X
2304-8557
publishDate 1995-01-01
description This article analyses the two different approaches to history and its representation demonstrated in Brink’s novels An Act of Terror (1991) and On the Contrary (1993) in terms of a response to the controversial influence of postmodernism on the historical novel in South Africa today. Although the first of these two novels, An Act of Terror, hints at the complexities of representation in historiography and fiction, it ultimately chooses against a postmodernist view of history, preferring to interpret and represent history in terms of an over-arching metanarrative and a stable subject because it facilitates effective political action. The article then argues that the second of these novels, On the Contrary, can be read as an affirmation of the postmodernist view o f history, especially when seen as an example of that variant of postmodernist historical fiction called “uchronian fiction” (Wesseling, 1991). Because uchronian fiction (the result of a cross-fertilization between historical fiction and science fiction) reconstructs the past in such as way as to propose possibilities for the transformation o f future societies, On the Contrary can also be read as a politically responsible novel, thus confirming the view that postmodernism has a political dimension.
url https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/644
work_keys_str_mv AT louiseviljoen rewritinghistoryandrebrinksanactofterror1991andonthecontrary1993
_version_ 1724929208250007552