A Comparison of Homogenization vs. Enzymatic Lysis for Microbiome Profiling in Clinical Endoscopic Biopsy Tissue Samples
Identification of the human microbiome has proven to be of utmost importance with the emerging role of bacteria in various physiological and pathological processes. High throughput sequencing strategies have evolved to assess the composition of the microbiome. To identify possible bias that may exis...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Microbiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03246/full |
id |
doaj-82c0f9c7a5664dd1977255456024f0e8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-82c0f9c7a5664dd1977255456024f0e82020-11-24T20:57:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2019-01-01910.3389/fmicb.2018.03246412012A Comparison of Homogenization vs. Enzymatic Lysis for Microbiome Profiling in Clinical Endoscopic Biopsy Tissue SamplesChao Zhang0Chao Zhang1Prashant V. Thakkar2Sarah Ellen Powell3Prateek Sharma4Sreekar Vennelaganti5Doron Betel6Doron Betel7Manish A. Shah8Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United StatesDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United StatesDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United StatesDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United StatesVeterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United StatesVeterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United StatesInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United StatesDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United StatesDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United StatesIdentification of the human microbiome has proven to be of utmost importance with the emerging role of bacteria in various physiological and pathological processes. High throughput sequencing strategies have evolved to assess the composition of the microbiome. To identify possible bias that may exist in the processing of tissue for whole genome sequencing (WGS), it is important to evaluate the extraction method on the overall microbial content and composition. Here we compare two different methods of extraction, homogenization vs. enzymatic lysis, on gastric, esophageal and colorectal biopsies and survey the microbial content and composition using WGS and quantitative PCR (qPCR). We examined total bacterial content using universal 16S rDNA qPCR as well as the abundance of three phyla (Actinobacter, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes) and one genus (Fusobacterium). We found minimal differences between the two extraction methods in the overall community structure. Furthermore, based on our qPCR analysis, neither method demonstrated preferential extraction of any particular clade of bacteria, nor significantly altered the detection of Gram-positive or Gram-negative organisms. However, although the overall microbial composition remained very similar and the most prevalent bacteria could be detected effectively using either method, the precise community structure and microbial abundances between the two methods were different, primarily due to variations in detection of low abundance genus. We also demonstrate that the homogenization extraction method provides higher microbial DNA content and higher read counts from human tissue biopsy samples of the gastrointestinal tract.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03246/fullgastrointestinal tractwhole genome sequencingquantitative PCRmicrobiomeclinical biopsymetagenomics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chao Zhang Chao Zhang Prashant V. Thakkar Sarah Ellen Powell Prateek Sharma Sreekar Vennelaganti Doron Betel Doron Betel Manish A. Shah |
spellingShingle |
Chao Zhang Chao Zhang Prashant V. Thakkar Sarah Ellen Powell Prateek Sharma Sreekar Vennelaganti Doron Betel Doron Betel Manish A. Shah A Comparison of Homogenization vs. Enzymatic Lysis for Microbiome Profiling in Clinical Endoscopic Biopsy Tissue Samples Frontiers in Microbiology gastrointestinal tract whole genome sequencing quantitative PCR microbiome clinical biopsy metagenomics |
author_facet |
Chao Zhang Chao Zhang Prashant V. Thakkar Sarah Ellen Powell Prateek Sharma Sreekar Vennelaganti Doron Betel Doron Betel Manish A. Shah |
author_sort |
Chao Zhang |
title |
A Comparison of Homogenization vs. Enzymatic Lysis for Microbiome Profiling in Clinical Endoscopic Biopsy Tissue Samples |
title_short |
A Comparison of Homogenization vs. Enzymatic Lysis for Microbiome Profiling in Clinical Endoscopic Biopsy Tissue Samples |
title_full |
A Comparison of Homogenization vs. Enzymatic Lysis for Microbiome Profiling in Clinical Endoscopic Biopsy Tissue Samples |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of Homogenization vs. Enzymatic Lysis for Microbiome Profiling in Clinical Endoscopic Biopsy Tissue Samples |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of Homogenization vs. Enzymatic Lysis for Microbiome Profiling in Clinical Endoscopic Biopsy Tissue Samples |
title_sort |
comparison of homogenization vs. enzymatic lysis for microbiome profiling in clinical endoscopic biopsy tissue samples |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Microbiology |
issn |
1664-302X |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Identification of the human microbiome has proven to be of utmost importance with the emerging role of bacteria in various physiological and pathological processes. High throughput sequencing strategies have evolved to assess the composition of the microbiome. To identify possible bias that may exist in the processing of tissue for whole genome sequencing (WGS), it is important to evaluate the extraction method on the overall microbial content and composition. Here we compare two different methods of extraction, homogenization vs. enzymatic lysis, on gastric, esophageal and colorectal biopsies and survey the microbial content and composition using WGS and quantitative PCR (qPCR). We examined total bacterial content using universal 16S rDNA qPCR as well as the abundance of three phyla (Actinobacter, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes) and one genus (Fusobacterium). We found minimal differences between the two extraction methods in the overall community structure. Furthermore, based on our qPCR analysis, neither method demonstrated preferential extraction of any particular clade of bacteria, nor significantly altered the detection of Gram-positive or Gram-negative organisms. However, although the overall microbial composition remained very similar and the most prevalent bacteria could be detected effectively using either method, the precise community structure and microbial abundances between the two methods were different, primarily due to variations in detection of low abundance genus. We also demonstrate that the homogenization extraction method provides higher microbial DNA content and higher read counts from human tissue biopsy samples of the gastrointestinal tract. |
topic |
gastrointestinal tract whole genome sequencing quantitative PCR microbiome clinical biopsy metagenomics |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03246/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chaozhang acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT chaozhang acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT prashantvthakkar acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT sarahellenpowell acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT prateeksharma acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT sreekarvennelaganti acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT doronbetel acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT doronbetel acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT manishashah acomparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT chaozhang comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT chaozhang comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT prashantvthakkar comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT sarahellenpowell comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT prateeksharma comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT sreekarvennelaganti comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT doronbetel comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT doronbetel comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples AT manishashah comparisonofhomogenizationvsenzymaticlysisformicrobiomeprofilinginclinicalendoscopicbiopsytissuesamples |
_version_ |
1716788492429688832 |