Discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.

Microarrays are commonly used in biology because of their ability to simultaneously measure thousands of genes under different conditions. Due to their structure, typically containing a high amount of variables but far fewer samples, scalable network analysis techniques are often employed. In partic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valeria Bo, Tanya Curtis, Artem Lysenko, Mansoor Saqi, Stephen Swift, Allan Tucker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4156366?pdf=render
id doaj-82bb09f8c21a4d9aa30695ca35dc352b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82bb09f8c21a4d9aa30695ca35dc352b2020-11-24T21:27:11ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0199e10652410.1371/journal.pone.0106524Discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.Valeria BoTanya CurtisArtem LysenkoMansoor SaqiStephen SwiftAllan TuckerMicroarrays are commonly used in biology because of their ability to simultaneously measure thousands of genes under different conditions. Due to their structure, typically containing a high amount of variables but far fewer samples, scalable network analysis techniques are often employed. In particular, consensus approaches have been recently used that combine multiple microarray studies in order to find networks that are more robust. The purpose of this paper, however, is to combine multiple microarray studies to automatically identify subnetworks that are distinctive to specific experimental conditions rather than common to them all. To better understand key regulatory mechanisms and how they change under different conditions, we derive unique networks from multiple independent networks built using glasso which goes beyond standard correlations. This involves calculating cluster prediction accuracies to detect the most predictive genes for a specific set of conditions. We differentiate between accuracies calculated using cross-validation within a selected cluster of studies (the intra prediction accuracy) and those calculated on a set of independent studies belonging to different study clusters (inter prediction accuracy). Finally, we compare our method's results to related state-of-the art techniques. We explore how the proposed pipeline performs on both synthetic data and real data (wheat and Fusarium). Our results show that subnetworks can be identified reliably that are specific to subsets of studies and that these networks reflect key mechanisms that are fundamental to the experimental conditions in each of those subsets.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4156366?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valeria Bo
Tanya Curtis
Artem Lysenko
Mansoor Saqi
Stephen Swift
Allan Tucker
spellingShingle Valeria Bo
Tanya Curtis
Artem Lysenko
Mansoor Saqi
Stephen Swift
Allan Tucker
Discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Valeria Bo
Tanya Curtis
Artem Lysenko
Mansoor Saqi
Stephen Swift
Allan Tucker
author_sort Valeria Bo
title Discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.
title_short Discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.
title_full Discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.
title_fullStr Discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.
title_full_unstemmed Discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.
title_sort discovering study-specific gene regulatory networks.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Microarrays are commonly used in biology because of their ability to simultaneously measure thousands of genes under different conditions. Due to their structure, typically containing a high amount of variables but far fewer samples, scalable network analysis techniques are often employed. In particular, consensus approaches have been recently used that combine multiple microarray studies in order to find networks that are more robust. The purpose of this paper, however, is to combine multiple microarray studies to automatically identify subnetworks that are distinctive to specific experimental conditions rather than common to them all. To better understand key regulatory mechanisms and how they change under different conditions, we derive unique networks from multiple independent networks built using glasso which goes beyond standard correlations. This involves calculating cluster prediction accuracies to detect the most predictive genes for a specific set of conditions. We differentiate between accuracies calculated using cross-validation within a selected cluster of studies (the intra prediction accuracy) and those calculated on a set of independent studies belonging to different study clusters (inter prediction accuracy). Finally, we compare our method's results to related state-of-the art techniques. We explore how the proposed pipeline performs on both synthetic data and real data (wheat and Fusarium). Our results show that subnetworks can be identified reliably that are specific to subsets of studies and that these networks reflect key mechanisms that are fundamental to the experimental conditions in each of those subsets.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4156366?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriabo discoveringstudyspecificgeneregulatorynetworks
AT tanyacurtis discoveringstudyspecificgeneregulatorynetworks
AT artemlysenko discoveringstudyspecificgeneregulatorynetworks
AT mansoorsaqi discoveringstudyspecificgeneregulatorynetworks
AT stephenswift discoveringstudyspecificgeneregulatorynetworks
AT allantucker discoveringstudyspecificgeneregulatorynetworks
_version_ 1725976190156537856