Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory

In this essay, we reconstruct a keyword for communication—affordance. Affordance, adopted from ecological psychology, is now widely used in technology studies, yet the term lacks a clear definition. This is especially problematic for scholars grappling with how to theorize the relationship between t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Nagy, Gina Neff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-09-01
Series:Social Media + Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
id doaj-82ae74734b6643b1bbb4eada0be250b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82ae74734b6643b1bbb4eada0be250b32020-11-25T03:43:31ZengSAGE PublishingSocial Media + Society2056-30512015-09-01110.1177/205630511560338510.1177_2056305115603385Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication TheoryPeter Nagy0Gina Neff1Central European University, HungaryUniversity of Washington, USAIn this essay, we reconstruct a keyword for communication—affordance. Affordance, adopted from ecological psychology, is now widely used in technology studies, yet the term lacks a clear definition. This is especially problematic for scholars grappling with how to theorize the relationship between technology and sociality for complex socio-technical systems such as machine-learning algorithms, pervasive computing, the Internet of Things, and other such “smart” innovations. Within technology studies, emerging theories of materiality, affect, and mediation all necessitate a richer and more nuanced definition for affordance than the field currently uses. To solve this, we develop the concept of imagined affordance. Imagined affordances emerge between users’ perceptions, attitudes, and expectations; between the materiality and functionality of technologies; and between the intentions and perceptions of designers. We use imagined affordance to evoke the importance of imagination in affordances—expectations for technology that are not fully realized in conscious, rational knowledge. We also use imagined affordance to distinguish our process-oriented, socio-technical definition of affordance from the “imagined” consensus of the field around a flimsier use of the term. We also use it in order to better capture the importance of mediation, materiality, and affect. We suggest that imagined affordance helps to theorize the duality of materiality and communication technology: namely, that people shape their media environments, perceive them, and have agency within them because of imagined affordances.https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Nagy
Gina Neff
spellingShingle Peter Nagy
Gina Neff
Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory
Social Media + Society
author_facet Peter Nagy
Gina Neff
author_sort Peter Nagy
title Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory
title_short Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory
title_full Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory
title_fullStr Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory
title_full_unstemmed Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory
title_sort imagined affordance: reconstructing a keyword for communication theory
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Social Media + Society
issn 2056-3051
publishDate 2015-09-01
description In this essay, we reconstruct a keyword for communication—affordance. Affordance, adopted from ecological psychology, is now widely used in technology studies, yet the term lacks a clear definition. This is especially problematic for scholars grappling with how to theorize the relationship between technology and sociality for complex socio-technical systems such as machine-learning algorithms, pervasive computing, the Internet of Things, and other such “smart” innovations. Within technology studies, emerging theories of materiality, affect, and mediation all necessitate a richer and more nuanced definition for affordance than the field currently uses. To solve this, we develop the concept of imagined affordance. Imagined affordances emerge between users’ perceptions, attitudes, and expectations; between the materiality and functionality of technologies; and between the intentions and perceptions of designers. We use imagined affordance to evoke the importance of imagination in affordances—expectations for technology that are not fully realized in conscious, rational knowledge. We also use imagined affordance to distinguish our process-oriented, socio-technical definition of affordance from the “imagined” consensus of the field around a flimsier use of the term. We also use it in order to better capture the importance of mediation, materiality, and affect. We suggest that imagined affordance helps to theorize the duality of materiality and communication technology: namely, that people shape their media environments, perceive them, and have agency within them because of imagined affordances.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
work_keys_str_mv AT peternagy imaginedaffordancereconstructingakeywordforcommunicationtheory
AT ginaneff imaginedaffordancereconstructingakeywordforcommunicationtheory
_version_ 1724519315623903232