How do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? The differing strategies of annuals and perennials

Abstract For a species to be able to respond to environmental change, it must either succeed in following its optimal environmental conditions or in persisting under suboptimal conditions, but we know very little about what controls these capacities. We parameterized species distribution models (SDM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hocine Ait Mouheb, Leila Kadik, Cécile Hélène Albert, Rachda Berrached, Andreas Prinzing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3664
id doaj-82ab1b34a4e64616a78a3f521107d59b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82ab1b34a4e64616a78a3f521107d59b2021-03-02T05:02:15ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582018-01-018113514910.1002/ece3.3664How do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? The differing strategies of annuals and perennialsHocine Ait Mouheb0Leila Kadik1Cécile Hélène Albert2Rachda Berrached3Andreas Prinzing4Laboratory of Ecology and Environment Faculty of Biological Sciences University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene Bab Ezzouar Algiers AlgeriaLaboratory of Ecology and Environment Faculty of Biological Sciences University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene Bab Ezzouar Algiers AlgeriaCNRS IRD IMBE Europôle Méditerranéen de l'Arbois Aix Marseille Univ Univ Avignon Aix‐en‐Provence Cedex 04 FranceLaboratory of Ecology and Environment Faculty of Biological Sciences University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene Bab Ezzouar Algiers AlgeriaResearch Unit “Ecosystèmes Biodiversité, Evolution” Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique University Rennes 1 Rennes FranceAbstract For a species to be able to respond to environmental change, it must either succeed in following its optimal environmental conditions or in persisting under suboptimal conditions, but we know very little about what controls these capacities. We parameterized species distribution models (SDMs) for 135 plant species from the Algerian steppes. We interpreted low false‐positive rates as reflecting a high capacity to follow optimal environmental conditions and high false‐negative rates as a high capacity to persist under suboptimal environmental conditions. We also measured functional traits in the field and built a unique plant trait database for the North‐African steppe. For both perennial and annual species, we explored how these two capacities can be explained by species traits and whether relevant trait values reflect species strategies or biases in SDMs. We found low false‐positive rates in species with small seeds, flowers attracting specialist pollinators, and specialized distributions (among annuals and perennials), low root:shoot ratios, wide root‐systems, and large leaves (perennials only) (R2 = .52–58). We found high false‐negative rates in species with marginal environmental distribution (among annuals and perennials), small seeds, relatively deep roots, and specialized distributions (annuals) or large leaves, wide root‐systems, and monocarpic life cycle (perennials) (R2 = .38 for annuals and 0.65 for perennials). Overall, relevant traits are rarely indicative of the possible biases of SDMs, but rather reflect the species' reproductive strategy, dispersal ability, stress tolerance, and pollination strategies. Our results suggest that wide undirected dispersal in annual species and efficient resource acquisition in perennial species favor both capacities, whereas short life spans in perennial species favor persistence in suboptimal environmental conditions and flowers attracting specialist pollinators in perennial and annual species favor following optimal environmental conditions. Species that neither follow nor persist will be at risk under future environmental change.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3664false‐negative ratefalse‐positive ratefollowing optimal environmental conditionsfunctional traitspersisting under suboptimal environmental conditionsspecies distribution model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hocine Ait Mouheb
Leila Kadik
Cécile Hélène Albert
Rachda Berrached
Andreas Prinzing
spellingShingle Hocine Ait Mouheb
Leila Kadik
Cécile Hélène Albert
Rachda Berrached
Andreas Prinzing
How do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? The differing strategies of annuals and perennials
Ecology and Evolution
false‐negative rate
false‐positive rate
following optimal environmental conditions
functional traits
persisting under suboptimal environmental conditions
species distribution model
author_facet Hocine Ait Mouheb
Leila Kadik
Cécile Hélène Albert
Rachda Berrached
Andreas Prinzing
author_sort Hocine Ait Mouheb
title How do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? The differing strategies of annuals and perennials
title_short How do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? The differing strategies of annuals and perennials
title_full How do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? The differing strategies of annuals and perennials
title_fullStr How do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? The differing strategies of annuals and perennials
title_full_unstemmed How do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? The differing strategies of annuals and perennials
title_sort how do steppe plants follow their optimal environmental conditions or persist under suboptimal conditions? the differing strategies of annuals and perennials
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Abstract For a species to be able to respond to environmental change, it must either succeed in following its optimal environmental conditions or in persisting under suboptimal conditions, but we know very little about what controls these capacities. We parameterized species distribution models (SDMs) for 135 plant species from the Algerian steppes. We interpreted low false‐positive rates as reflecting a high capacity to follow optimal environmental conditions and high false‐negative rates as a high capacity to persist under suboptimal environmental conditions. We also measured functional traits in the field and built a unique plant trait database for the North‐African steppe. For both perennial and annual species, we explored how these two capacities can be explained by species traits and whether relevant trait values reflect species strategies or biases in SDMs. We found low false‐positive rates in species with small seeds, flowers attracting specialist pollinators, and specialized distributions (among annuals and perennials), low root:shoot ratios, wide root‐systems, and large leaves (perennials only) (R2 = .52–58). We found high false‐negative rates in species with marginal environmental distribution (among annuals and perennials), small seeds, relatively deep roots, and specialized distributions (annuals) or large leaves, wide root‐systems, and monocarpic life cycle (perennials) (R2 = .38 for annuals and 0.65 for perennials). Overall, relevant traits are rarely indicative of the possible biases of SDMs, but rather reflect the species' reproductive strategy, dispersal ability, stress tolerance, and pollination strategies. Our results suggest that wide undirected dispersal in annual species and efficient resource acquisition in perennial species favor both capacities, whereas short life spans in perennial species favor persistence in suboptimal environmental conditions and flowers attracting specialist pollinators in perennial and annual species favor following optimal environmental conditions. Species that neither follow nor persist will be at risk under future environmental change.
topic false‐negative rate
false‐positive rate
following optimal environmental conditions
functional traits
persisting under suboptimal environmental conditions
species distribution model
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3664
work_keys_str_mv AT hocineaitmouheb howdosteppeplantsfollowtheiroptimalenvironmentalconditionsorpersistundersuboptimalconditionsthedifferingstrategiesofannualsandperennials
AT leilakadik howdosteppeplantsfollowtheiroptimalenvironmentalconditionsorpersistundersuboptimalconditionsthedifferingstrategiesofannualsandperennials
AT cecilehelenealbert howdosteppeplantsfollowtheiroptimalenvironmentalconditionsorpersistundersuboptimalconditionsthedifferingstrategiesofannualsandperennials
AT rachdaberrached howdosteppeplantsfollowtheiroptimalenvironmentalconditionsorpersistundersuboptimalconditionsthedifferingstrategiesofannualsandperennials
AT andreasprinzing howdosteppeplantsfollowtheiroptimalenvironmentalconditionsorpersistundersuboptimalconditionsthedifferingstrategiesofannualsandperennials
_version_ 1724242814132289536