“KRYASHEN QUESTION” IN THE ALL-RUSSIAN CENSUS OF 2002: THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICIZE ETHNICITY

The article analyzes the phenomenon of the “Kryashen question” during the 2002 census. The events related to the mentioned phenomenon generated a large-scale national relations crisis in the Republic of Tatarstan. The aim of this study is to answer the question: “Does the Kryashen question really ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew Eugenievich Denisov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2018-12-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/viewFile/19635/16286
id doaj-82aa1ea5353b41e3b2362dc770aa8082
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82aa1ea5353b41e3b2362dc770aa80822020-11-25T00:16:49ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Political Science2313-14382313-14462018-12-0120332333310.22363/2313-1438-2018-20-3-323-33316950“KRYASHEN QUESTION” IN THE ALL-RUSSIAN CENSUS OF 2002: THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICIZE ETHNICITYAndrew Eugenievich Denisov0Center of Islamic Studies, Academy of Sciences of TatarstanThe article analyzes the phenomenon of the “Kryashen question” during the 2002 census. The events related to the mentioned phenomenon generated a large-scale national relations crisis in the Republic of Tatarstan. The aim of this study is to answer the question: “Does the Kryashen question really exist or was it artificially constructed?” To answer this question, the author uses the method of event analysis in this research, obtaining information from the media (both from informational sources and socio-political publications). Another method used in this survey is the retrospective situational analysis of the data: the reconstruction of events post factum relying only on factual presentations and actions of the parties. This method is used to establish interrelations between the interest groups and possible development of the situation. In the research, the author identifies key actors in the campaign for developing the Kryashens’ aspirations to register themselves as a separate ethnic group (separate census category). The research also presents the pattern of their interaction and clarifies the positions of different parties engaged in the Kryashen occurrence. The author also highlights the intervening factors reinforcing the development of the crisis in interethnic relations. In conclusion, the author points out the delusiveness of “Kryashen problem” and the pointless nature of dispute between the conflicting parties (by using different explanatory models of ethnicity and the actual recognition of Kryashens as a special subconfessional group by all parties).http://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/viewFile/19635/16286identityKryashen questionKryashensnationalismnational movements2002 censusTatarstan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Eugenievich Denisov
spellingShingle Andrew Eugenievich Denisov
“KRYASHEN QUESTION” IN THE ALL-RUSSIAN CENSUS OF 2002: THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICIZE ETHNICITY
RUDN Journal of Political Science
identity
Kryashen question
Kryashens
nationalism
national movements
2002 census
Tatarstan
author_facet Andrew Eugenievich Denisov
author_sort Andrew Eugenievich Denisov
title “KRYASHEN QUESTION” IN THE ALL-RUSSIAN CENSUS OF 2002: THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICIZE ETHNICITY
title_short “KRYASHEN QUESTION” IN THE ALL-RUSSIAN CENSUS OF 2002: THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICIZE ETHNICITY
title_full “KRYASHEN QUESTION” IN THE ALL-RUSSIAN CENSUS OF 2002: THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICIZE ETHNICITY
title_fullStr “KRYASHEN QUESTION” IN THE ALL-RUSSIAN CENSUS OF 2002: THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICIZE ETHNICITY
title_full_unstemmed “KRYASHEN QUESTION” IN THE ALL-RUSSIAN CENSUS OF 2002: THE ATTEMPT TO POLITICIZE ETHNICITY
title_sort “kryashen question” in the all-russian census of 2002: the attempt to politicize ethnicity
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series RUDN Journal of Political Science
issn 2313-1438
2313-1446
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The article analyzes the phenomenon of the “Kryashen question” during the 2002 census. The events related to the mentioned phenomenon generated a large-scale national relations crisis in the Republic of Tatarstan. The aim of this study is to answer the question: “Does the Kryashen question really exist or was it artificially constructed?” To answer this question, the author uses the method of event analysis in this research, obtaining information from the media (both from informational sources and socio-political publications). Another method used in this survey is the retrospective situational analysis of the data: the reconstruction of events post factum relying only on factual presentations and actions of the parties. This method is used to establish interrelations between the interest groups and possible development of the situation. In the research, the author identifies key actors in the campaign for developing the Kryashens’ aspirations to register themselves as a separate ethnic group (separate census category). The research also presents the pattern of their interaction and clarifies the positions of different parties engaged in the Kryashen occurrence. The author also highlights the intervening factors reinforcing the development of the crisis in interethnic relations. In conclusion, the author points out the delusiveness of “Kryashen problem” and the pointless nature of dispute between the conflicting parties (by using different explanatory models of ethnicity and the actual recognition of Kryashens as a special subconfessional group by all parties).
topic identity
Kryashen question
Kryashens
nationalism
national movements
2002 census
Tatarstan
url http://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/viewFile/19635/16286
work_keys_str_mv AT andreweugenievichdenisov kryashenquestionintheallrussiancensusof2002theattempttopoliticizeethnicity
_version_ 1725382443151654912