Markers of Ethnocultural Identity in Medical Research Papers
Cross-cultural differences in academic discourse as a field of applied linguistic research became mainstream at the end of the 20th century. Two fundamental concepts emerged at that period: one highlighted universal features of academic discourse, the other focused on ethnocultural peculiarities of...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2020-01-01
|
Series: | SHS Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2020/16/shsconf_lltforum2020_01008.pdf |
id |
doaj-827f5142a93b4813ab8faa24dcf9c4a9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-827f5142a93b4813ab8faa24dcf9c4a92021-04-02T18:46:44ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242020-01-01880100810.1051/shsconf/20208801008shsconf_lltforum2020_01008Markers of Ethnocultural Identity in Medical Research PapersTorubarova Irina0Stebletsova Anna1Linaker Tanya2Foreign Languages Department, Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical UniversityForeign Languages Department, Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical UniversityModern Language Centre, King’s CollegeCross-cultural differences in academic discourse as a field of applied linguistic research became mainstream at the end of the 20th century. Two fundamental concepts emerged at that period: one highlighted universal features of academic discourse, the other focused on ethnocultural peculiarities of cognitive and textual structures. Research in the field of academic discourse becomes particularly significant when applied to training and education of academic staff. Accepting the idea of universal features of academic discourse, we, however, tend to support the concept claiming that academic writing style may contain markers of ethnocultural identity of their authors. So, the aim of our research was to identify markers of ethnocultural identity in medical research texts. The study included comparative discourse analysis of research focused medical texts created by English-speaking (ES) and Russian-speaking (RS) authors. The results obtained have drawn us to the conclusion that despite universal features that scientific medical texts of the same genres share, they nevertheless manifest specific properties depending on the linguistic and cultural affiliation of their authors, i.e. markers of ethnocultural identity. This knowledge can contribute to international academic communication.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2020/16/shsconf_lltforum2020_01008.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Torubarova Irina Stebletsova Anna Linaker Tanya |
spellingShingle |
Torubarova Irina Stebletsova Anna Linaker Tanya Markers of Ethnocultural Identity in Medical Research Papers SHS Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Torubarova Irina Stebletsova Anna Linaker Tanya |
author_sort |
Torubarova Irina |
title |
Markers of Ethnocultural Identity in Medical Research Papers |
title_short |
Markers of Ethnocultural Identity in Medical Research Papers |
title_full |
Markers of Ethnocultural Identity in Medical Research Papers |
title_fullStr |
Markers of Ethnocultural Identity in Medical Research Papers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Markers of Ethnocultural Identity in Medical Research Papers |
title_sort |
markers of ethnocultural identity in medical research papers |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
SHS Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-2424 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Cross-cultural differences in academic discourse as a field of applied linguistic research became mainstream at the end of the 20th century. Two fundamental concepts emerged at that period: one highlighted universal features of academic discourse, the other focused on ethnocultural peculiarities of cognitive and textual structures. Research in the field of academic discourse becomes particularly significant when applied to training and education of academic staff. Accepting the idea of universal features of academic discourse, we, however, tend to support the concept claiming that academic writing style may contain markers of ethnocultural identity of their authors. So, the aim of our research was to identify markers of ethnocultural identity in medical research texts. The study included comparative discourse analysis of research focused medical texts created by English-speaking (ES) and Russian-speaking (RS) authors. The results obtained have drawn us to the conclusion that despite universal features that scientific medical texts of the same genres share, they nevertheless manifest specific properties depending on the linguistic and cultural affiliation of their authors, i.e. markers of ethnocultural identity. This knowledge can contribute to international academic communication. |
url |
https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2020/16/shsconf_lltforum2020_01008.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT torubarovairina markersofethnoculturalidentityinmedicalresearchpapers AT stebletsovaanna markersofethnoculturalidentityinmedicalresearchpapers AT linakertanya markersofethnoculturalidentityinmedicalresearchpapers |
_version_ |
1721550937841991680 |