The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians
INTRODUCTION: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is one of the most commonly performed test in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A 15 item questionnaire surv...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.morthoj.org/2015/v9n3/passive-straight-leg-raising.pdf |
id |
doaj-826729e3be50435b9d71111ffdfd2507 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-826729e3be50435b9d71111ffdfd25072021-05-02T16:21:13ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332015-11-01934448http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1511.012The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of CliniciansPande K0MDINTRODUCTION: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is one of the most commonly performed test in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A 15 item questionnaire survey was developed covering various aspects of PSLRT. Orthopaedic surgeons (n=15), neurosurgeons (n=7) and physiotherapists (n=9) were identified as clinicians performing this test regularly and were approached to take part in the survey. RESULTS: The PSLRT was used in all cases of back and leg pain by 68% and correctly performed by 30/31. There was a wide variation in the angle at which it was considered positive (median 45 degrees; range 10-90 degrees). Only 7/31 correctly recognised reproduction of leg pain as indicative of a positive PSLRT. The sitting /distraction SLRT and well leg / cross SLRT was performed only by 3/31 and 16/31 of clinicians respectively. 90% felt that a positive PSLRT suggested nerve root irritation and 57% thought it was due to stretch of dura and / or nerve root. 23/31 clinicians felt that PSLRT was useful or very useful and 90% reported that result of PSLRT would affect the way they treat a patient. CONCLUSIONS: PSLRT is widely used, correctly performed and felt to be useful in practice. But the interpretation of a positive test, understanding of its mechanism and use of variations is poor. There is a need to improve the interpretation and understanding of PSLRT amongst its users.http://www.morthoj.org/2015/v9n3/passive-straight-leg-raising.pdfSurveyPassive Straight Leg Raising TestLow back painRadiculopathyDiagnosis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pande K |
spellingShingle |
Pande K The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal Survey Passive Straight Leg Raising Test Low back pain Radiculopathy Diagnosis |
author_facet |
Pande K |
author_sort |
Pande K |
title |
The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_short |
The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_full |
The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_fullStr |
The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_sort |
use of passive straight leg raising test: a survey of clinicians |
publisher |
Malaysian Orthopaedic Association |
series |
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal |
issn |
1985-2533 |
publishDate |
2015-11-01 |
description |
INTRODUCTION: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is
one of the most commonly performed test in clinical
practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice
and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a
tertiary care hospital.
METHODS: A 15 item questionnaire survey was developed
covering various aspects of PSLRT. Orthopaedic surgeons
(n=15), neurosurgeons (n=7) and physiotherapists (n=9)
were identified as clinicians performing this test regularly
and were approached to take part in the survey.
RESULTS: The PSLRT was used in all cases of back and leg
pain by 68% and correctly performed by 30/31. There was a
wide variation in the angle at which it was considered
positive (median 45 degrees; range 10-90 degrees). Only
7/31 correctly recognised reproduction of leg pain as
indicative of a positive PSLRT. The sitting /distraction SLRT
and well leg / cross SLRT was performed only by 3/31 and
16/31 of clinicians respectively. 90% felt that a positive
PSLRT suggested nerve root irritation and 57% thought it
was due to stretch of dura and / or nerve root. 23/31
clinicians felt that PSLRT was useful or very useful and 90%
reported that result of PSLRT would affect the way they treat
a patient.
CONCLUSIONS: PSLRT is widely used, correctly performed
and felt to be useful in practice. But the interpretation of a
positive test, understanding of its mechanism and use of
variations is poor. There is a need to improve the
interpretation and understanding of PSLRT amongst its
users. |
topic |
Survey Passive Straight Leg Raising Test Low back pain Radiculopathy Diagnosis |
url |
http://www.morthoj.org/2015/v9n3/passive-straight-leg-raising.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pandek theuseofpassivestraightlegraisingtestasurveyofclinicians AT pandek useofpassivestraightlegraisingtestasurveyofclinicians |
_version_ |
1721490081131266048 |