The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians

INTRODUCTION: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is one of the most commonly performed test in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A 15 item questionnaire surv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pande K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2015-11-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.morthoj.org/2015/v9n3/passive-straight-leg-raising.pdf
id doaj-826729e3be50435b9d71111ffdfd2507
record_format Article
spelling doaj-826729e3be50435b9d71111ffdfd25072021-05-02T16:21:13ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332015-11-01934448http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1511.012The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of CliniciansPande K0MDINTRODUCTION: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is one of the most commonly performed test in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A 15 item questionnaire survey was developed covering various aspects of PSLRT. Orthopaedic surgeons (n=15), neurosurgeons (n=7) and physiotherapists (n=9) were identified as clinicians performing this test regularly and were approached to take part in the survey. RESULTS: The PSLRT was used in all cases of back and leg pain by 68% and correctly performed by 30/31. There was a wide variation in the angle at which it was considered positive (median 45 degrees; range 10-90 degrees). Only 7/31 correctly recognised reproduction of leg pain as indicative of a positive PSLRT. The sitting /distraction SLRT and well leg / cross SLRT was performed only by 3/31 and 16/31 of clinicians respectively. 90% felt that a positive PSLRT suggested nerve root irritation and 57% thought it was due to stretch of dura and / or nerve root. 23/31 clinicians felt that PSLRT was useful or very useful and 90% reported that result of PSLRT would affect the way they treat a patient. CONCLUSIONS: PSLRT is widely used, correctly performed and felt to be useful in practice. But the interpretation of a positive test, understanding of its mechanism and use of variations is poor. There is a need to improve the interpretation and understanding of PSLRT amongst its users.http://www.morthoj.org/2015/v9n3/passive-straight-leg-raising.pdfSurveyPassive Straight Leg Raising TestLow back painRadiculopathyDiagnosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pande K
spellingShingle Pande K
The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Survey
Passive Straight Leg Raising Test
Low back pain
Radiculopathy
Diagnosis
author_facet Pande K
author_sort Pande K
title The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians
title_short The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians
title_full The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians
title_fullStr The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians
title_sort use of passive straight leg raising test: a survey of clinicians
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
issn 1985-2533
publishDate 2015-11-01
description INTRODUCTION: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is one of the most commonly performed test in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A 15 item questionnaire survey was developed covering various aspects of PSLRT. Orthopaedic surgeons (n=15), neurosurgeons (n=7) and physiotherapists (n=9) were identified as clinicians performing this test regularly and were approached to take part in the survey. RESULTS: The PSLRT was used in all cases of back and leg pain by 68% and correctly performed by 30/31. There was a wide variation in the angle at which it was considered positive (median 45 degrees; range 10-90 degrees). Only 7/31 correctly recognised reproduction of leg pain as indicative of a positive PSLRT. The sitting /distraction SLRT and well leg / cross SLRT was performed only by 3/31 and 16/31 of clinicians respectively. 90% felt that a positive PSLRT suggested nerve root irritation and 57% thought it was due to stretch of dura and / or nerve root. 23/31 clinicians felt that PSLRT was useful or very useful and 90% reported that result of PSLRT would affect the way they treat a patient. CONCLUSIONS: PSLRT is widely used, correctly performed and felt to be useful in practice. But the interpretation of a positive test, understanding of its mechanism and use of variations is poor. There is a need to improve the interpretation and understanding of PSLRT amongst its users.
topic Survey
Passive Straight Leg Raising Test
Low back pain
Radiculopathy
Diagnosis
url http://www.morthoj.org/2015/v9n3/passive-straight-leg-raising.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pandek theuseofpassivestraightlegraisingtestasurveyofclinicians
AT pandek useofpassivestraightlegraisingtestasurveyofclinicians
_version_ 1721490081131266048