On-Body Sensor Positions Hierarchical Classification

Many motion sensor-based applications have been developed in recent years because they provide useful information about daily activities and current health status of users. However, most of these applications require knowledge of sensor positions. Therefore, this research focused on the problem of d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vu Ngoc Thanh Sang, Shiro Yano, Toshiyuki Kondo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-10-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/11/3612
id doaj-8260dc6c5e93471fb1a55ec6ec9f2aab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8260dc6c5e93471fb1a55ec6ec9f2aab2020-11-25T02:11:07ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202018-10-011811361210.3390/s18113612s18113612On-Body Sensor Positions Hierarchical ClassificationVu Ngoc Thanh Sang0Shiro Yano1Toshiyuki Kondo2Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 184-8588, JapanDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 184-8588, JapanDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 184-8588, JapanMany motion sensor-based applications have been developed in recent years because they provide useful information about daily activities and current health status of users. However, most of these applications require knowledge of sensor positions. Therefore, this research focused on the problem of detecting sensor positions. We collected standing-still and walking sensor data at various body positions from ten subjects. The offset values were removed by subtracting the sensor data of standing-still phase from the walking data for each axis of each sensor unit. Our hierarchical classification technique is based on optimizing local classifiers. Many common features are computed, and informative features are selected for specific classifications. In this approach, local classifiers such as arm-side and hand-side discriminations yielded F1-scores of 0.99 and 1.00, correspondingly. Overall, the proposed method achieved an F1-score of 0.81 and 0.84 using accelerometers and gyroscopes, respectively. Furthermore, we also discuss contributive features and parameter tuning in this analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/11/3612sensor positioninertial measurement unitfeature selectionfractal dimensionhierarchical classification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vu Ngoc Thanh Sang
Shiro Yano
Toshiyuki Kondo
spellingShingle Vu Ngoc Thanh Sang
Shiro Yano
Toshiyuki Kondo
On-Body Sensor Positions Hierarchical Classification
Sensors
sensor position
inertial measurement unit
feature selection
fractal dimension
hierarchical classification
author_facet Vu Ngoc Thanh Sang
Shiro Yano
Toshiyuki Kondo
author_sort Vu Ngoc Thanh Sang
title On-Body Sensor Positions Hierarchical Classification
title_short On-Body Sensor Positions Hierarchical Classification
title_full On-Body Sensor Positions Hierarchical Classification
title_fullStr On-Body Sensor Positions Hierarchical Classification
title_full_unstemmed On-Body Sensor Positions Hierarchical Classification
title_sort on-body sensor positions hierarchical classification
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Many motion sensor-based applications have been developed in recent years because they provide useful information about daily activities and current health status of users. However, most of these applications require knowledge of sensor positions. Therefore, this research focused on the problem of detecting sensor positions. We collected standing-still and walking sensor data at various body positions from ten subjects. The offset values were removed by subtracting the sensor data of standing-still phase from the walking data for each axis of each sensor unit. Our hierarchical classification technique is based on optimizing local classifiers. Many common features are computed, and informative features are selected for specific classifications. In this approach, local classifiers such as arm-side and hand-side discriminations yielded F1-scores of 0.99 and 1.00, correspondingly. Overall, the proposed method achieved an F1-score of 0.81 and 0.84 using accelerometers and gyroscopes, respectively. Furthermore, we also discuss contributive features and parameter tuning in this analysis.
topic sensor position
inertial measurement unit
feature selection
fractal dimension
hierarchical classification
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/11/3612
work_keys_str_mv AT vungocthanhsang onbodysensorpositionshierarchicalclassification
AT shiroyano onbodysensorpositionshierarchicalclassification
AT toshiyukikondo onbodysensorpositionshierarchicalclassification
_version_ 1724916213702721536