Can Complaining Modify a Smoking Environment: A Study on the Effects of Complaining on Smoking Behavior in Different Bars Using Agent-Based Model Implementation

In spite of the smoking ban that has been implemented in several European Union countries such as Portugal, Italy, Austria, Germany, and France, the Dutch have been reluctant to implement a total smoking ban in bars. The smoking ban is widely believed to reduce nicotine levels inhaled by bar workers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edison D. Macusi, Gerardus Fisscher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Philippines 2013-12-01
Series:Social Science Diliman
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/socialsciencediliman/article/view/3947/3600
id doaj-825f77079f2f465fa99da07f96ed0232
record_format Article
spelling doaj-825f77079f2f465fa99da07f96ed02322020-11-24T22:39:49ZengUniversity of the PhilippinesSocial Science Diliman1655-15242012-07962013-12-01927395Can Complaining Modify a Smoking Environment: A Study on the Effects of Complaining on Smoking Behavior in Different Bars Using Agent-Based Model Implementation Edison D. Macusi0Gerardus Fisscher1Wageningen University, The Netherlands & Davao del Norte State College Wageningen University, The NetherlandsIn spite of the smoking ban that has been implemented in several European Union countries such as Portugal, Italy, Austria, Germany, and France, the Dutch have been reluctant to implement a total smoking ban in bars. The smoking ban is widely believed to reduce nicotine levels inhaled by bar workers and customers, reduce air pollution, indirectly help potential quitters move towards having a healthy lifestyle, and protect the public from potential health risks. Further, restrictions to smoking have led to a reduction in the number of individuals who smoke, provided smoke-free environments, and decreased the exposure of children and youth to advertisements encouraging smoking behavior. Although the potential benefits of the smoking ban have been established, some bar owners in The Netherlands are reluctant to follow the implementation of the ban. Reasons mentioned by bar owners for noncompliance include minimal sanctions, competitors that allowed smoking in their bar, and delayed enforcement. Reasons to comply include: if the cost for compliance were minimal, if competitors were complying, and if the implementation of law were consistent and coordinated. In this study we simulated the behavior of smoking and nonsmoking individuals with different addiction, annoyance, and intolerance levels. Using agent-based modelling our agents were initialized with these attributes either as 1 or 2 wherein 1 represented a low level and 2 a high level. In our model we simulated how a complaining behavior can enforce a social norm, such as “no smoking is allowed.” We focused on how complaining elicits obedience to accepted norms on the basis that complaining promotes normative obedience and discourages misconduct about noncompliance of smoking individuals. Secondary to this goal is the expectation that because smoking is banned in bars but may be allowed in some other bars, a segregation of groups may emerge as a consequence of sanctioning an illegal behavior in some bars but accepting itin other bars. http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/socialsciencediliman/article/view/3947/3600Barscomplainingemergentnonsmokingsmokesmokingsocial normsagent-based modellingsmoking ban
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edison D. Macusi
Gerardus Fisscher
spellingShingle Edison D. Macusi
Gerardus Fisscher
Can Complaining Modify a Smoking Environment: A Study on the Effects of Complaining on Smoking Behavior in Different Bars Using Agent-Based Model Implementation
Social Science Diliman
Bars
complaining
emergent
nonsmoking
smoke
smoking
social norms
agent-based modelling
smoking ban
author_facet Edison D. Macusi
Gerardus Fisscher
author_sort Edison D. Macusi
title Can Complaining Modify a Smoking Environment: A Study on the Effects of Complaining on Smoking Behavior in Different Bars Using Agent-Based Model Implementation
title_short Can Complaining Modify a Smoking Environment: A Study on the Effects of Complaining on Smoking Behavior in Different Bars Using Agent-Based Model Implementation
title_full Can Complaining Modify a Smoking Environment: A Study on the Effects of Complaining on Smoking Behavior in Different Bars Using Agent-Based Model Implementation
title_fullStr Can Complaining Modify a Smoking Environment: A Study on the Effects of Complaining on Smoking Behavior in Different Bars Using Agent-Based Model Implementation
title_full_unstemmed Can Complaining Modify a Smoking Environment: A Study on the Effects of Complaining on Smoking Behavior in Different Bars Using Agent-Based Model Implementation
title_sort can complaining modify a smoking environment: a study on the effects of complaining on smoking behavior in different bars using agent-based model implementation
publisher University of the Philippines
series Social Science Diliman
issn 1655-1524
2012-0796
publishDate 2013-12-01
description In spite of the smoking ban that has been implemented in several European Union countries such as Portugal, Italy, Austria, Germany, and France, the Dutch have been reluctant to implement a total smoking ban in bars. The smoking ban is widely believed to reduce nicotine levels inhaled by bar workers and customers, reduce air pollution, indirectly help potential quitters move towards having a healthy lifestyle, and protect the public from potential health risks. Further, restrictions to smoking have led to a reduction in the number of individuals who smoke, provided smoke-free environments, and decreased the exposure of children and youth to advertisements encouraging smoking behavior. Although the potential benefits of the smoking ban have been established, some bar owners in The Netherlands are reluctant to follow the implementation of the ban. Reasons mentioned by bar owners for noncompliance include minimal sanctions, competitors that allowed smoking in their bar, and delayed enforcement. Reasons to comply include: if the cost for compliance were minimal, if competitors were complying, and if the implementation of law were consistent and coordinated. In this study we simulated the behavior of smoking and nonsmoking individuals with different addiction, annoyance, and intolerance levels. Using agent-based modelling our agents were initialized with these attributes either as 1 or 2 wherein 1 represented a low level and 2 a high level. In our model we simulated how a complaining behavior can enforce a social norm, such as “no smoking is allowed.” We focused on how complaining elicits obedience to accepted norms on the basis that complaining promotes normative obedience and discourages misconduct about noncompliance of smoking individuals. Secondary to this goal is the expectation that because smoking is banned in bars but may be allowed in some other bars, a segregation of groups may emerge as a consequence of sanctioning an illegal behavior in some bars but accepting itin other bars.
topic Bars
complaining
emergent
nonsmoking
smoke
smoking
social norms
agent-based modelling
smoking ban
url http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/socialsciencediliman/article/view/3947/3600
work_keys_str_mv AT edisondmacusi cancomplainingmodifyasmokingenvironmentastudyontheeffectsofcomplainingonsmokingbehaviorindifferentbarsusingagentbasedmodelimplementation
AT gerardusfisscher cancomplainingmodifyasmokingenvironmentastudyontheeffectsofcomplainingonsmokingbehaviorindifferentbarsusingagentbasedmodelimplementation
_version_ 1725707413206597632