Drawbacks and aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care access

Background: Following the introduction of the Affordable Care Act, various studies have tried to identify the effects of the Reform, without reaching a clear consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether expansion of the Medicaid program has led to less inequality in access to health...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniele Corso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Public Health Research
Subjects:
ACA
Online Access:https://jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2135
id doaj-82574c4b9f6f40248933ae25f89e1695
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82574c4b9f6f40248933ae25f89e16952021-05-06T08:15:55ZengPAGEPress PublicationsJournal of Public Health Research2279-90282279-90362021-05-0110.4081/jphr.2021.2135Drawbacks and aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care accessDaniele Corso0Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia Background: Following the introduction of the Affordable Care Act, various studies have tried to identify the effects of the Reform, without reaching a clear consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether expansion of the Medicaid program has led to less inequality in access to health care and to a higher level of ex-ante moral hazard. Design and Methods: The analysis was conducted on two-year longitudinal data (2014-2015) regarding a cohort of 15,898 individuals from a Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). After a data cleaning procedure, a sample of 9,255 individuals was selected for the inequality part of the study and 2,307 for the ex-ante moral hazard analysis. Propensity score matching with nearest-neighbour and kernel matching algorithms, difference-in-difference models and concentration index, corrected according to Erreygers methodology, were adopted. Results: The analysis showed that disparities were reduced between social classes although the ex-ante moral hazard is a real problem with the Affordable Care Act since individuals covered by public insurance tended to abuse the public service. Among those who benefited from the Act, a reduction in preventive behaviours was observed: there was an increase in smoking and a decrease in level of physical activity. As far as concerns access to health care, there was a decrease in inequality in emergency visits, inability to get care and getting care when needed among beneficiaries of the Reform. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the extension of Medicaid has had a dual effect of reducing disparities in access to health care but, at the same time, it seems to have induced people to take less care of themselves. https://jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2135ACAmoral hazardhealthcareinequalities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniele Corso
spellingShingle Daniele Corso
Drawbacks and aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care access
Journal of Public Health Research
ACA
moral hazard
healthcare
inequalities
author_facet Daniele Corso
author_sort Daniele Corso
title Drawbacks and aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care access
title_short Drawbacks and aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care access
title_full Drawbacks and aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care access
title_fullStr Drawbacks and aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care access
title_full_unstemmed Drawbacks and aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care access
title_sort drawbacks and aftermath of the affordable care act: ex-ante moral hazard and inequalities in health care access
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Journal of Public Health Research
issn 2279-9028
2279-9036
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Background: Following the introduction of the Affordable Care Act, various studies have tried to identify the effects of the Reform, without reaching a clear consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether expansion of the Medicaid program has led to less inequality in access to health care and to a higher level of ex-ante moral hazard. Design and Methods: The analysis was conducted on two-year longitudinal data (2014-2015) regarding a cohort of 15,898 individuals from a Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). After a data cleaning procedure, a sample of 9,255 individuals was selected for the inequality part of the study and 2,307 for the ex-ante moral hazard analysis. Propensity score matching with nearest-neighbour and kernel matching algorithms, difference-in-difference models and concentration index, corrected according to Erreygers methodology, were adopted. Results: The analysis showed that disparities were reduced between social classes although the ex-ante moral hazard is a real problem with the Affordable Care Act since individuals covered by public insurance tended to abuse the public service. Among those who benefited from the Act, a reduction in preventive behaviours was observed: there was an increase in smoking and a decrease in level of physical activity. As far as concerns access to health care, there was a decrease in inequality in emergency visits, inability to get care and getting care when needed among beneficiaries of the Reform. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the extension of Medicaid has had a dual effect of reducing disparities in access to health care but, at the same time, it seems to have induced people to take less care of themselves.
topic ACA
moral hazard
healthcare
inequalities
url https://jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2135
work_keys_str_mv AT danielecorso drawbacksandaftermathoftheaffordablecareactexantemoralhazardandinequalitiesinhealthcareaccess
_version_ 1721457062048694272