Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint

Objective To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair by two suture anchors and acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) fixation using heavy nonabsorbable sutures for the treatment of types III–V ACJ injuries with a minimum of 1‐year fol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tao Liu, Fei‐long Bao, Tao Jiang, Guang‐wei Ji, Jian‐min Li, Jörg Jerosch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Orthopaedic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12771
id doaj-824bdb6ca8d449abaf66987797591af5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-824bdb6ca8d449abaf66987797591af52020-11-25T04:09:10ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612020-10-011251362137110.1111/os.12771Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular JointTao Liu0Fei‐long Bao1Tao Jiang2Guang‐wei Ji3Jian‐min Li4Jörg Jerosch5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Qingdao ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University Jinan ChinaClinic for Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery Johanna‐Etienne Hospital Neuss GermanyObjective To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair by two suture anchors and acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) fixation using heavy nonabsorbable sutures for the treatment of types III–V ACJ injuries with a minimum of 1‐year follow‐up. Methods The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 36 consecutive patients (26 men and 10 women) who underwent anatomic reduction for acute ACJ dislocation using two suture anchors for CC ligament reconstruction and two strands of non‐absorbable stitches for ACJ fixation between December 2013 and December 2018 were reviewed. Two 3.5 mm suture anchors with double‐loaded sutures were separately inserted into the anterolateral and posteromedial portions of the coracoid process. The suture strands were passed through the hole created in the clavicle using 2.0 mm drill and tied over the clavicle. Additional ACJ augmentation using two strands of non‐absorbable heavy sutures was performed in all patients. At 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow‐up visit, the scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant–Murley score, and simple shoulder test (SST) questionnaires were used to provide a final evaluation of shoulder function. Comparison between baseline and treatment results was performed. Radiographic analysis included vertical displacement and horizontal shift. Results A total of 29 patients (20 men and nine women) were included in the study. A total of seven, six, and 16 patients had Rockwood type III, type IV, and type V ACJ dislocations, respectively. The mean patient age was 42.8 ± 13.5 years, with a mean follow‐up of 28 months (range, 12–56 months). At the 12‐month follow‐up, the mean ASES score was 92.1 ± 3.5, with a mean pain score of 0.5 ± 0.7 on the VAS and mean Constant–Murley score of 93.0 ± 2.4. The new number of positive answers on the SST was 11.5 ± 0.6. Compared with the baseline, the clinical results improved significantly (P < 0.05). No significant difference could be found between the 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up evaluations (P > 0.05). Radiographs showed two partial loss of reduction, whereas no horizontal displacement was found in all patients. One patient developed a superficial wound infection 3 weeks postoperation. The wound healed after routine wound care. No neurovascular complications were recorded. Conclusions CC ligament reconstruction using two suture anchors and ACJ augmentation using two strands of non‐absorbable heavy sutures on high‐grade AC dislocation is a reliable technique for restoring stability to the ACJ and can obtain good to excellent clinical results.https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12771Acromioclavicular dislocationCoracoacromial ligamentsHeavy sutures augmentationHorizontal stabilitySuture anchors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tao Liu
Fei‐long Bao
Tao Jiang
Guang‐wei Ji
Jian‐min Li
Jörg Jerosch
spellingShingle Tao Liu
Fei‐long Bao
Tao Jiang
Guang‐wei Ji
Jian‐min Li
Jörg Jerosch
Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint
Orthopaedic Surgery
Acromioclavicular dislocation
Coracoacromial ligaments
Heavy sutures augmentation
Horizontal stability
Suture anchors
author_facet Tao Liu
Fei‐long Bao
Tao Jiang
Guang‐wei Ji
Jian‐min Li
Jörg Jerosch
author_sort Tao Liu
title Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint
title_short Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint
title_full Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint
title_fullStr Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint
title_full_unstemmed Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint
title_sort acromioclavicular joint separation: repair through suture anchors for coracoclavicular ligament and nonabsorbable suture fixation for acromioclavicular joint
publisher Wiley
series Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 1757-7853
1757-7861
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Objective To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair by two suture anchors and acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) fixation using heavy nonabsorbable sutures for the treatment of types III–V ACJ injuries with a minimum of 1‐year follow‐up. Methods The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 36 consecutive patients (26 men and 10 women) who underwent anatomic reduction for acute ACJ dislocation using two suture anchors for CC ligament reconstruction and two strands of non‐absorbable stitches for ACJ fixation between December 2013 and December 2018 were reviewed. Two 3.5 mm suture anchors with double‐loaded sutures were separately inserted into the anterolateral and posteromedial portions of the coracoid process. The suture strands were passed through the hole created in the clavicle using 2.0 mm drill and tied over the clavicle. Additional ACJ augmentation using two strands of non‐absorbable heavy sutures was performed in all patients. At 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow‐up visit, the scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant–Murley score, and simple shoulder test (SST) questionnaires were used to provide a final evaluation of shoulder function. Comparison between baseline and treatment results was performed. Radiographic analysis included vertical displacement and horizontal shift. Results A total of 29 patients (20 men and nine women) were included in the study. A total of seven, six, and 16 patients had Rockwood type III, type IV, and type V ACJ dislocations, respectively. The mean patient age was 42.8 ± 13.5 years, with a mean follow‐up of 28 months (range, 12–56 months). At the 12‐month follow‐up, the mean ASES score was 92.1 ± 3.5, with a mean pain score of 0.5 ± 0.7 on the VAS and mean Constant–Murley score of 93.0 ± 2.4. The new number of positive answers on the SST was 11.5 ± 0.6. Compared with the baseline, the clinical results improved significantly (P < 0.05). No significant difference could be found between the 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up evaluations (P > 0.05). Radiographs showed two partial loss of reduction, whereas no horizontal displacement was found in all patients. One patient developed a superficial wound infection 3 weeks postoperation. The wound healed after routine wound care. No neurovascular complications were recorded. Conclusions CC ligament reconstruction using two suture anchors and ACJ augmentation using two strands of non‐absorbable heavy sutures on high‐grade AC dislocation is a reliable technique for restoring stability to the ACJ and can obtain good to excellent clinical results.
topic Acromioclavicular dislocation
Coracoacromial ligaments
Heavy sutures augmentation
Horizontal stability
Suture anchors
url https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12771
work_keys_str_mv AT taoliu acromioclavicularjointseparationrepairthroughsutureanchorsforcoracoclavicularligamentandnonabsorbablesuturefixationforacromioclavicularjoint
AT feilongbao acromioclavicularjointseparationrepairthroughsutureanchorsforcoracoclavicularligamentandnonabsorbablesuturefixationforacromioclavicularjoint
AT taojiang acromioclavicularjointseparationrepairthroughsutureanchorsforcoracoclavicularligamentandnonabsorbablesuturefixationforacromioclavicularjoint
AT guangweiji acromioclavicularjointseparationrepairthroughsutureanchorsforcoracoclavicularligamentandnonabsorbablesuturefixationforacromioclavicularjoint
AT jianminli acromioclavicularjointseparationrepairthroughsutureanchorsforcoracoclavicularligamentandnonabsorbablesuturefixationforacromioclavicularjoint
AT jorgjerosch acromioclavicularjointseparationrepairthroughsutureanchorsforcoracoclavicularligamentandnonabsorbablesuturefixationforacromioclavicularjoint
_version_ 1724422966441148416