Commentary: Mid-20th Century Development of Brazilian Archaeology (1964–1985)
Two recent articles in the International Journal of Historical Archaeology provide a bit of light on the development of Brazilian archaeology in the middle 20th century. The first is one by Pedro Paulo de Abreu Funari entitled ‘Class Interests in Brazilian Archaeo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2004-11-01
|
Series: | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/168 |
id |
doaj-8219c85490ba406fac5d5e46e9dba5b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8219c85490ba406fac5d5e46e9dba5b92020-11-25T00:35:14ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology1062-47402047-69302004-11-01142202210.5334/bha.14204166Commentary: Mid-20th Century Development of Brazilian Archaeology (1964–1985)David L. Browman0Washington University – St LouisTwo recent articles in the International Journal of Historical Archaeology provide a bit of light on the development of Brazilian archaeology in the middle 20th century. The first is one by Pedro Paulo de Abreu Funari entitled ‘Class Interests in Brazilian Archaeology’ (Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 209–216, 2002) and the second is a heated response to Funari, along with his rejoinder, by James A. Delle, Igor Chmyz, Ondemar Ferreira Dias, Tania Andrade Lima, Betty J. Meggers, and Pedro Paulo de Abreu Funari, entitled ‘On Collaboration, Class Conflict, and Archaeology in Brazil’ (Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 223–237, 2003).http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/168Brazilian archaeology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David L. Browman |
spellingShingle |
David L. Browman Commentary: Mid-20th Century Development of Brazilian Archaeology (1964–1985) Bulletin of the History of Archaeology Brazilian archaeology |
author_facet |
David L. Browman |
author_sort |
David L. Browman |
title |
Commentary: Mid-20th Century Development of Brazilian Archaeology
(1964–1985) |
title_short |
Commentary: Mid-20th Century Development of Brazilian Archaeology
(1964–1985) |
title_full |
Commentary: Mid-20th Century Development of Brazilian Archaeology
(1964–1985) |
title_fullStr |
Commentary: Mid-20th Century Development of Brazilian Archaeology
(1964–1985) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Commentary: Mid-20th Century Development of Brazilian Archaeology
(1964–1985) |
title_sort |
commentary: mid-20th century development of brazilian archaeology
(1964–1985) |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
issn |
1062-4740 2047-6930 |
publishDate |
2004-11-01 |
description |
Two recent articles in the International Journal of
Historical Archaeology provide a bit of light on the development of Brazilian
archaeology in the middle 20th century. The first is one by Pedro Paulo de Abreu Funari
entitled ‘Class Interests in Brazilian Archaeology’ (Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 209–216, 2002)
and the second is a heated response to Funari, along with his rejoinder, by James A.
Delle, Igor Chmyz, Ondemar Ferreira Dias, Tania Andrade Lima, Betty J. Meggers, and
Pedro Paulo de Abreu Funari, entitled ‘On Collaboration, Class Conflict, and Archaeology
in Brazil’ (Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 223–237, 2003). |
topic |
Brazilian archaeology |
url |
http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/168 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidlbrowman commentarymid20thcenturydevelopmentofbrazilianarchaeology19641985 |
_version_ |
1725309633032093696 |