Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative

Background As part of the scale-up of the Patient Care Collaborative (PCC) at our institution, we explored staff perceptions and patient outcomes at different levels of model implementation in three general internal medicine units.Methods We conducted a mixed-methods embedded experimental healthcare...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Barrett, Kelly LoPresti, Julianne Camera, Caroline Gosse, Donna Johnson, Gaya Amirthavasar, John Nashid, Mirabel Mbuagbaw, Thuvaraha Vanniyasingam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-01
Series:BMJ Open Quality
Online Access:https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/9/2/e000815.full
id doaj-82116601a2e9450aabc6b88742ea4a70
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82116601a2e9450aabc6b88742ea4a702020-11-25T03:28:18ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412020-06-019210.1136/bmjoq-2019-000815Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiativeElizabeth BarrettKelly LoPrestiJulianne CameraCaroline GosseDonna JohnsonGaya AmirthavasarJohn NashidMirabel MbuagbawThuvaraha VanniyasingamBackground As part of the scale-up of the Patient Care Collaborative (PCC) at our institution, we explored staff perceptions and patient outcomes at different levels of model implementation in three general internal medicine units.Methods We conducted a mixed-methods embedded experimental healthcare improvement initiative. In the qualitative strand, we conducted five focus group discussions. In the quantitative strand, we used hospital administrative data to compare outcomes (falls per 1000, median length of stay in days and resource use measured as resource intensity weights (RIW), before and after the implementation of the PCC, using χ2 tests, Wilcoxon’s rank sum tests and interrupted time series analyses.Results Staff showed considerable knowledge and acceptance of the PCC but expressed mixed feelings with regards to patient safety, workload, communication and teamwork. Staff perceptions varied by level of implementation of the PCC. A number of falls (overall) in the full implementation phase were not significantly different from the preimplementation phase (227 per 1000 vs 200 per 1000; p=0.449), but the number of moderate to severe falls dropped (12 vs 2 per 1000); p<0.001). Median length of stay (5 vs 6 days; p<0.001) and resource use were lower (0.1 vs 0.4; p<0.001) in the full implementation phase compared with the preimplementation phase. The trend analyses showed differences across units.Conclusions The PCC was moderately well adopted. Perceptions of the PCC among staff and patient outcomes are likely linked to the levels of implementation. The PCC resulted in improved safety, shorter hospital stays and lower costs of care.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/9/2/e000815.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth Barrett
Kelly LoPresti
Julianne Camera
Caroline Gosse
Donna Johnson
Gaya Amirthavasar
John Nashid
Mirabel Mbuagbaw
Thuvaraha Vanniyasingam
spellingShingle Elizabeth Barrett
Kelly LoPresti
Julianne Camera
Caroline Gosse
Donna Johnson
Gaya Amirthavasar
John Nashid
Mirabel Mbuagbaw
Thuvaraha Vanniyasingam
Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative
BMJ Open Quality
author_facet Elizabeth Barrett
Kelly LoPresti
Julianne Camera
Caroline Gosse
Donna Johnson
Gaya Amirthavasar
John Nashid
Mirabel Mbuagbaw
Thuvaraha Vanniyasingam
author_sort Elizabeth Barrett
title Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative
title_short Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative
title_full Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative
title_fullStr Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative
title_full_unstemmed Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative
title_sort implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Quality
issn 2399-6641
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background As part of the scale-up of the Patient Care Collaborative (PCC) at our institution, we explored staff perceptions and patient outcomes at different levels of model implementation in three general internal medicine units.Methods We conducted a mixed-methods embedded experimental healthcare improvement initiative. In the qualitative strand, we conducted five focus group discussions. In the quantitative strand, we used hospital administrative data to compare outcomes (falls per 1000, median length of stay in days and resource use measured as resource intensity weights (RIW), before and after the implementation of the PCC, using χ2 tests, Wilcoxon’s rank sum tests and interrupted time series analyses.Results Staff showed considerable knowledge and acceptance of the PCC but expressed mixed feelings with regards to patient safety, workload, communication and teamwork. Staff perceptions varied by level of implementation of the PCC. A number of falls (overall) in the full implementation phase were not significantly different from the preimplementation phase (227 per 1000 vs 200 per 1000; p=0.449), but the number of moderate to severe falls dropped (12 vs 2 per 1000); p<0.001). Median length of stay (5 vs 6 days; p<0.001) and resource use were lower (0.1 vs 0.4; p<0.001) in the full implementation phase compared with the preimplementation phase. The trend analyses showed differences across units.Conclusions The PCC was moderately well adopted. Perceptions of the PCC among staff and patient outcomes are likely linked to the levels of implementation. The PCC resulted in improved safety, shorter hospital stays and lower costs of care.
url https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/9/2/e000815.full
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethbarrett implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
AT kellylopresti implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
AT juliannecamera implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
AT carolinegosse implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
AT donnajohnson implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
AT gayaamirthavasar implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
AT johnnashid implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
AT mirabelmbuagbaw implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
AT thuvarahavanniyasingam implementingthepatientcarecollaborativemodelinthreegeneralinternalmedicineunitsamixedmethodshealthcareimprovementinitiative
_version_ 1724585131659755520