Screening-level exposure-based prioritization to identify potential POPs, vPvBs and planetary boundary threats among Arctic contaminants

A report that reviews Arctic contaminants that are not currently regulated as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) under international treaties was recently published by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). We evaluated 464 individual chemicals mentioned in the AMAP report accordin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Efstathios Reppas-Chrysovitsinos, Anna Sobek, Matthew MacLeod
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2017-06-01
Series:Emerging Contaminants
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405665017300148
Description
Summary:A report that reviews Arctic contaminants that are not currently regulated as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) under international treaties was recently published by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). We evaluated 464 individual chemicals mentioned in the AMAP report according to hazard profiles for POPs, very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) chemicals, and two novel and distinct hazard profiles we derived from the planetary boundary threat framework. The two planetary boundary threat profiles assign high priority to chemicals that will be mobile and poorly reversible environmental contaminants. Utilizing persistence as a proxy for poor reversibility, we defined two exposure-based hazard profiles; airborne persistent contaminants (APCs) and waterborne persistent contaminants (WPCs) that are potential planetary boundary threats. We used in silico estimates of physicochemical properties and multimedia models to calculate hazard metrics for persistence, bioaccumulation and long-range transport potential, then we synthesized this information into four exposure-based hazard scores of the potential of each AMAP chemical to fit each of the POP, vPvB, APC and WPC exposure-based hazard profiles. As an alternative to adopting a “bright line” score that represented cause for concern, we scored the AMAP chemicals by benchmarking against a reference set of 148 known and relatively well-studied contaminants and expressed their exposure-based hazard scores as percentile ranks against the scores of the reference set chemicals. Our results show that scores in the four exposure-based hazard profiles provide complementary information about the potential environmental exposure-based hazards of the AMAP chemicals. Our POP, vPvB, APC and WPC exposure-based hazard scores identify high priority chemicals for further study from among the AMAP contaminants.
ISSN:2405-6650