Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag

Abstract Background In 2019, Kaya-Okur et al. reported on the cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) technology for efficient profiling of epigenetically modified DNA fragments. It was used mainly for cultured cell lines and was especially effective for small samples and single cells....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoyuan Tao, Shouli Feng, Ting Zhao, Xueying Guan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:Plant Methods
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13007-020-00664-8
id doaj-81f2c49516c24b77ab1ec865b1d30af0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81f2c49516c24b77ab1ec865b1d30af02020-11-25T03:25:18ZengBMCPlant Methods1746-48112020-08-0116111510.1186/s13007-020-00664-8Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&TagXiaoyuan Tao0Shouli Feng1Ting Zhao2Xueying Guan3College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang UniversityCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang UniversityCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang UniversityCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang UniversityAbstract Background In 2019, Kaya-Okur et al. reported on the cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) technology for efficient profiling of epigenetically modified DNA fragments. It was used mainly for cultured cell lines and was especially effective for small samples and single cells. This strategy generated high-resolution and low-background-noise chromatin profiling data for epigenomic analysis. CUT&Tag is well suited to be used in plant cells, especially in tissues from which small samples are taken, such as ovules, anthers, and fibers. Results Here, we present a CUT&Tag protocol step by step using plant nuclei. In this protocol, we quantified the nuclei that can be used in each CUT&Tag reaction, and compared the efficiency of CUT&Tag with chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq) in the leaves of cotton. A general workflow for the bioinformatic analysis of CUT&Tag is also provided. Results indicated that, compared with ChIP-seq, the CUT&Tag procedure was faster and showed a higher-resolution, lower-background signal than did ChIP. Conclusion A CUT&Tag protocol has been refined for plant cells using intact nuclei that have been isolated.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13007-020-00664-8Cut&TagCottonHistone H3K4me3ChIP
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaoyuan Tao
Shouli Feng
Ting Zhao
Xueying Guan
spellingShingle Xiaoyuan Tao
Shouli Feng
Ting Zhao
Xueying Guan
Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag
Plant Methods
Cut&Tag
Cotton
Histone H3K4me3
ChIP
author_facet Xiaoyuan Tao
Shouli Feng
Ting Zhao
Xueying Guan
author_sort Xiaoyuan Tao
title Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag
title_short Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag
title_full Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag
title_fullStr Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag
title_full_unstemmed Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag
title_sort efficient chromatin profiling of h3k4me3 modification in cotton using cut&tag
publisher BMC
series Plant Methods
issn 1746-4811
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background In 2019, Kaya-Okur et al. reported on the cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) technology for efficient profiling of epigenetically modified DNA fragments. It was used mainly for cultured cell lines and was especially effective for small samples and single cells. This strategy generated high-resolution and low-background-noise chromatin profiling data for epigenomic analysis. CUT&Tag is well suited to be used in plant cells, especially in tissues from which small samples are taken, such as ovules, anthers, and fibers. Results Here, we present a CUT&Tag protocol step by step using plant nuclei. In this protocol, we quantified the nuclei that can be used in each CUT&Tag reaction, and compared the efficiency of CUT&Tag with chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq) in the leaves of cotton. A general workflow for the bioinformatic analysis of CUT&Tag is also provided. Results indicated that, compared with ChIP-seq, the CUT&Tag procedure was faster and showed a higher-resolution, lower-background signal than did ChIP. Conclusion A CUT&Tag protocol has been refined for plant cells using intact nuclei that have been isolated.
topic Cut&Tag
Cotton
Histone H3K4me3
ChIP
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13007-020-00664-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyuantao efficientchromatinprofilingofh3k4me3modificationincottonusingcuttag
AT shoulifeng efficientchromatinprofilingofh3k4me3modificationincottonusingcuttag
AT tingzhao efficientchromatinprofilingofh3k4me3modificationincottonusingcuttag
AT xueyingguan efficientchromatinprofilingofh3k4me3modificationincottonusingcuttag
_version_ 1724597665421852672