Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag
Abstract Background In 2019, Kaya-Okur et al. reported on the cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) technology for efficient profiling of epigenetically modified DNA fragments. It was used mainly for cultured cell lines and was especially effective for small samples and single cells....
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Plant Methods |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13007-020-00664-8 |
id |
doaj-81f2c49516c24b77ab1ec865b1d30af0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-81f2c49516c24b77ab1ec865b1d30af02020-11-25T03:25:18ZengBMCPlant Methods1746-48112020-08-0116111510.1186/s13007-020-00664-8Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&TagXiaoyuan Tao0Shouli Feng1Ting Zhao2Xueying Guan3College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang UniversityCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang UniversityCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang UniversityCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang UniversityAbstract Background In 2019, Kaya-Okur et al. reported on the cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) technology for efficient profiling of epigenetically modified DNA fragments. It was used mainly for cultured cell lines and was especially effective for small samples and single cells. This strategy generated high-resolution and low-background-noise chromatin profiling data for epigenomic analysis. CUT&Tag is well suited to be used in plant cells, especially in tissues from which small samples are taken, such as ovules, anthers, and fibers. Results Here, we present a CUT&Tag protocol step by step using plant nuclei. In this protocol, we quantified the nuclei that can be used in each CUT&Tag reaction, and compared the efficiency of CUT&Tag with chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq) in the leaves of cotton. A general workflow for the bioinformatic analysis of CUT&Tag is also provided. Results indicated that, compared with ChIP-seq, the CUT&Tag procedure was faster and showed a higher-resolution, lower-background signal than did ChIP. Conclusion A CUT&Tag protocol has been refined for plant cells using intact nuclei that have been isolated.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13007-020-00664-8Cut&TagCottonHistone H3K4me3ChIP |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xiaoyuan Tao Shouli Feng Ting Zhao Xueying Guan |
spellingShingle |
Xiaoyuan Tao Shouli Feng Ting Zhao Xueying Guan Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag Plant Methods Cut&Tag Cotton Histone H3K4me3 ChIP |
author_facet |
Xiaoyuan Tao Shouli Feng Ting Zhao Xueying Guan |
author_sort |
Xiaoyuan Tao |
title |
Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag |
title_short |
Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag |
title_full |
Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag |
title_fullStr |
Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficient chromatin profiling of H3K4me3 modification in cotton using CUT&Tag |
title_sort |
efficient chromatin profiling of h3k4me3 modification in cotton using cut&tag |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Plant Methods |
issn |
1746-4811 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background In 2019, Kaya-Okur et al. reported on the cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) technology for efficient profiling of epigenetically modified DNA fragments. It was used mainly for cultured cell lines and was especially effective for small samples and single cells. This strategy generated high-resolution and low-background-noise chromatin profiling data for epigenomic analysis. CUT&Tag is well suited to be used in plant cells, especially in tissues from which small samples are taken, such as ovules, anthers, and fibers. Results Here, we present a CUT&Tag protocol step by step using plant nuclei. In this protocol, we quantified the nuclei that can be used in each CUT&Tag reaction, and compared the efficiency of CUT&Tag with chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq) in the leaves of cotton. A general workflow for the bioinformatic analysis of CUT&Tag is also provided. Results indicated that, compared with ChIP-seq, the CUT&Tag procedure was faster and showed a higher-resolution, lower-background signal than did ChIP. Conclusion A CUT&Tag protocol has been refined for plant cells using intact nuclei that have been isolated. |
topic |
Cut&Tag Cotton Histone H3K4me3 ChIP |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13007-020-00664-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xiaoyuantao efficientchromatinprofilingofh3k4me3modificationincottonusingcuttag AT shoulifeng efficientchromatinprofilingofh3k4me3modificationincottonusingcuttag AT tingzhao efficientchromatinprofilingofh3k4me3modificationincottonusingcuttag AT xueyingguan efficientchromatinprofilingofh3k4me3modificationincottonusingcuttag |
_version_ |
1724597665421852672 |