‘Welcome to Europe’: A Bridge East of Architectural History

This position paper examines the complex boundaries that separate Europe from both its constructed margins and those of its imagined Others. Where exactly do we enter the Continent and where does it end? Is it while crossing the world-famous bridge on the Bosporus, for instance, that one receives th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kivanç Kilinç
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2018-06-01
Series:Architectural Histories
Online Access:https://journal.eahn.org/articles/272
id doaj-81f1829d177942e4b7e0cc851f67cf32
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81f1829d177942e4b7e0cc851f67cf322020-11-24T21:37:16ZengUbiquity PressArchitectural Histories2050-58332018-06-016110.5334/ah.272124‘Welcome to Europe’: A Bridge East of Architectural HistoryKivanç Kilinç0Yasar University Architecture Department, IzmirThis position paper examines the complex boundaries that separate Europe from both its constructed margins and those of its imagined Others. Where exactly do we enter the Continent and where does it end? Is it while crossing the world-famous bridge on the Bosporus, for instance, that one receives the first impression of Europe, or is it somewhere farther west — past a ‘wall’ protected by a strong border regime? To address these questions, this paper tells two concomitant stories about the practices of urban governance and architectural design in Turkey in the early twentieth century by providing snapshots of numerous encounters and negotiations between multiple actors: American public health specialists, European-trained local bureaucrats, and a French city planner. While Turkey’s dubious position between the West and the East provides the potential for rethinking the boundaries of the Continent, the paper uses the Turkish case primarily to unpack the idea of ‘Europe’ as both a fluid entity and a fixed location, an uneven terrain upon which canonical discourses of identity are constructed. In doing so, it points to the interchangeability of subject positions, which often result in competing narratives of modernization, urban design, and the whereabouts of the line separating Turkey from Europe.https://journal.eahn.org/articles/272
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kivanç Kilinç
spellingShingle Kivanç Kilinç
‘Welcome to Europe’: A Bridge East of Architectural History
Architectural Histories
author_facet Kivanç Kilinç
author_sort Kivanç Kilinç
title ‘Welcome to Europe’: A Bridge East of Architectural History
title_short ‘Welcome to Europe’: A Bridge East of Architectural History
title_full ‘Welcome to Europe’: A Bridge East of Architectural History
title_fullStr ‘Welcome to Europe’: A Bridge East of Architectural History
title_full_unstemmed ‘Welcome to Europe’: A Bridge East of Architectural History
title_sort ‘welcome to europe’: a bridge east of architectural history
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Architectural Histories
issn 2050-5833
publishDate 2018-06-01
description This position paper examines the complex boundaries that separate Europe from both its constructed margins and those of its imagined Others. Where exactly do we enter the Continent and where does it end? Is it while crossing the world-famous bridge on the Bosporus, for instance, that one receives the first impression of Europe, or is it somewhere farther west — past a ‘wall’ protected by a strong border regime? To address these questions, this paper tells two concomitant stories about the practices of urban governance and architectural design in Turkey in the early twentieth century by providing snapshots of numerous encounters and negotiations between multiple actors: American public health specialists, European-trained local bureaucrats, and a French city planner. While Turkey’s dubious position between the West and the East provides the potential for rethinking the boundaries of the Continent, the paper uses the Turkish case primarily to unpack the idea of ‘Europe’ as both a fluid entity and a fixed location, an uneven terrain upon which canonical discourses of identity are constructed. In doing so, it points to the interchangeability of subject positions, which often result in competing narratives of modernization, urban design, and the whereabouts of the line separating Turkey from Europe.
url https://journal.eahn.org/articles/272
work_keys_str_mv AT kivanckilinc welcometoeuropeabridgeeastofarchitecturalhistory
_version_ 1725937347025960960