A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt Impacts

The following is a review of the processes currently employed when validating the intracranial response of Finite Element Head Models (FEHM) against blunt impacts. The authors aim to collate existing validation tools, their applications and findings on their effectiveness to aid researchers in the v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. McGill, F. Teixeira-Dias, A. Callanan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/20/7227
id doaj-81e712af612c4b64ba7bb63cd9f2b860
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81e712af612c4b64ba7bb63cd9f2b8602020-11-25T03:53:54ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-10-01107227722710.3390/app10207227A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt ImpactsK. McGill0F. Teixeira-Dias1A. Callanan2Institute for Infrastructure and Environment (IIE), School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FG, UKInstitute for Infrastructure and Environment (IIE), School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FG, UKInstitute of BioEngineering (IBioE), School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, UKThe following is a review of the processes currently employed when validating the intracranial response of Finite Element Head Models (FEHM) against blunt impacts. The authors aim to collate existing validation tools, their applications and findings on their effectiveness to aid researchers in the validation of future FEHM and potential efforts in improving procedures. In this vain, publications providing experimental data on the intracranial pressure, relative brain displacement and brain strain responses to impacts in human subjects are surveyed and key data are summarised. This includes cases that have previously been used in FEHM validation and alternatives with similar potential uses. The processes employed to replicate impact conditions and the resulting head motion are reviewed, as are the analytical techniques used to judge the validity of the models. Finally, publications exploring the validation process and factors affecting it are critically discussed. Reviewing FEHM validation in this way highlights the lack of a single best practice, or an obvious solution to create one using the tools currently available. There is clear scope to improve the validation process of FEHM, and the data available to achieve this. By collecting information from existing publications, it is hoped this review can help guide such developments and provide a point of reference for researchers looking to validate or investigate FEHM in the future, enabling them to make informed choices about the simulation of impacts, how they are generated numerically and the factors considered during output assessment, whilst being aware of potential limitations in the process.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/20/7227Finite Element Head ModelsFEHMvalidationmild Traumatic Brain Injury
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. McGill
F. Teixeira-Dias
A. Callanan
spellingShingle K. McGill
F. Teixeira-Dias
A. Callanan
A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt Impacts
Applied Sciences
Finite Element Head Models
FEHM
validation
mild Traumatic Brain Injury
author_facet K. McGill
F. Teixeira-Dias
A. Callanan
author_sort K. McGill
title A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt Impacts
title_short A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt Impacts
title_full A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt Impacts
title_fullStr A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt Impacts
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt Impacts
title_sort review of validation methods for the intracranial response of fehm to blunt impacts
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2020-10-01
description The following is a review of the processes currently employed when validating the intracranial response of Finite Element Head Models (FEHM) against blunt impacts. The authors aim to collate existing validation tools, their applications and findings on their effectiveness to aid researchers in the validation of future FEHM and potential efforts in improving procedures. In this vain, publications providing experimental data on the intracranial pressure, relative brain displacement and brain strain responses to impacts in human subjects are surveyed and key data are summarised. This includes cases that have previously been used in FEHM validation and alternatives with similar potential uses. The processes employed to replicate impact conditions and the resulting head motion are reviewed, as are the analytical techniques used to judge the validity of the models. Finally, publications exploring the validation process and factors affecting it are critically discussed. Reviewing FEHM validation in this way highlights the lack of a single best practice, or an obvious solution to create one using the tools currently available. There is clear scope to improve the validation process of FEHM, and the data available to achieve this. By collecting information from existing publications, it is hoped this review can help guide such developments and provide a point of reference for researchers looking to validate or investigate FEHM in the future, enabling them to make informed choices about the simulation of impacts, how they are generated numerically and the factors considered during output assessment, whilst being aware of potential limitations in the process.
topic Finite Element Head Models
FEHM
validation
mild Traumatic Brain Injury
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/20/7227
work_keys_str_mv AT kmcgill areviewofvalidationmethodsfortheintracranialresponseoffehmtobluntimpacts
AT fteixeiradias areviewofvalidationmethodsfortheintracranialresponseoffehmtobluntimpacts
AT acallanan areviewofvalidationmethodsfortheintracranialresponseoffehmtobluntimpacts
AT kmcgill reviewofvalidationmethodsfortheintracranialresponseoffehmtobluntimpacts
AT fteixeiradias reviewofvalidationmethodsfortheintracranialresponseoffehmtobluntimpacts
AT acallanan reviewofvalidationmethodsfortheintracranialresponseoffehmtobluntimpacts
_version_ 1724476004415569920