Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study established the reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey (DFS).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two studies were carried out in separate populations. The first i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shimono Tsutomu, Kaji Mari, Nakai Yukie, Mori Yukako, Milgrom Peter, Yoshida Toshiko, Donaldson Ana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-07-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/17
id doaj-81dc735c36d3493b987d812c5884ff7c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81dc735c36d3493b987d812c5884ff7c2020-11-24T22:01:02ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312009-07-01911710.1186/1472-6831-9-17Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear SurveyShimono TsutomuKaji MariNakai YukieMori YukakoMilgrom PeterYoshida ToshikoDonaldson Ana<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study established the reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey (DFS).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two studies were carried out in separate populations. The first involved 166 Japanese dental and nursing students and assessed internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The second involved 2,095 Japanese parents or guardians of school children and tested the hypothesis that the conceptual structure of the Japanese translation was consistent with the U.S. version using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the first study Cronbach alpha ranged from .94 to .96 and test-retest reliability (Spearman correlation) ranged from .89 to .92. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) was 0.919 (95%CI: 0.892 – 0.940). In the second study SEM was used on the covariance matrix of the 20 questions in a random sample of 600 questionnaires to evaluate the goodness of fit of the theoretical model; and then, in an exploratory manner corrected for specification errors until a model that fit the data well was achieved.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Japanese version of the DFS appears reliable and demonstrates cross-cultural validity. The modeling confirms the three factors on which the English language version was based.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/17
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shimono Tsutomu
Kaji Mari
Nakai Yukie
Mori Yukako
Milgrom Peter
Yoshida Toshiko
Donaldson Ana
spellingShingle Shimono Tsutomu
Kaji Mari
Nakai Yukie
Mori Yukako
Milgrom Peter
Yoshida Toshiko
Donaldson Ana
Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey
BMC Oral Health
author_facet Shimono Tsutomu
Kaji Mari
Nakai Yukie
Mori Yukako
Milgrom Peter
Yoshida Toshiko
Donaldson Ana
author_sort Shimono Tsutomu
title Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey
title_short Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey
title_full Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey
title_fullStr Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey
title_sort reliability and cross-cultural validity of a japanese version of the dental fear survey
publisher BMC
series BMC Oral Health
issn 1472-6831
publishDate 2009-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study established the reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey (DFS).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two studies were carried out in separate populations. The first involved 166 Japanese dental and nursing students and assessed internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The second involved 2,095 Japanese parents or guardians of school children and tested the hypothesis that the conceptual structure of the Japanese translation was consistent with the U.S. version using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the first study Cronbach alpha ranged from .94 to .96 and test-retest reliability (Spearman correlation) ranged from .89 to .92. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) was 0.919 (95%CI: 0.892 – 0.940). In the second study SEM was used on the covariance matrix of the 20 questions in a random sample of 600 questionnaires to evaluate the goodness of fit of the theoretical model; and then, in an exploratory manner corrected for specification errors until a model that fit the data well was achieved.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Japanese version of the DFS appears reliable and demonstrates cross-cultural validity. The modeling confirms the three factors on which the English language version was based.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/17
work_keys_str_mv AT shimonotsutomu reliabilityandcrossculturalvalidityofajapaneseversionofthedentalfearsurvey
AT kajimari reliabilityandcrossculturalvalidityofajapaneseversionofthedentalfearsurvey
AT nakaiyukie reliabilityandcrossculturalvalidityofajapaneseversionofthedentalfearsurvey
AT moriyukako reliabilityandcrossculturalvalidityofajapaneseversionofthedentalfearsurvey
AT milgrompeter reliabilityandcrossculturalvalidityofajapaneseversionofthedentalfearsurvey
AT yoshidatoshiko reliabilityandcrossculturalvalidityofajapaneseversionofthedentalfearsurvey
AT donaldsonana reliabilityandcrossculturalvalidityofajapaneseversionofthedentalfearsurvey
_version_ 1725842136901877760