Quality indicators for the acute and long-term management of anaphylaxis: a systematic review
Abstract Background The quality of acute and long-term anaphylaxis management is variable and this contributes to the poor outcomes experienced by many patients. Clinical practice guidelines have the potential to improve outcomes, but implementing guideline recommendations in routine practice is cha...
Main Authors: | Sangeeta Dhami, Aadam Sheikh, Antonella Muraro, Graham Roberts, Susanne Halken, Monserat Fernandez Rivas, Margitta Worm, Aziz Sheikh |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Clinical and Translational Allergy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13601-017-0151-1 |
Similar Items
-
EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe
by: Magdalena Kraft, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Living with severe allergy: an Anaphylaxis Campaign national survey of young people
by: Worth Allison, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Adherence to adrenaline autoinjector prescriptions in patients with anaphylaxis
by: Louise Parke, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Editorial: Anaphylaxis – A Distinct Immunological Syndrome, but How Much Do We Really Understand?
by: Mamidipudi Thirumala Krishna, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
EAACI anaphylaxis guidelines: systematic review protocol
by: Debra de Silva, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)