Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT)
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Coronary computed tomography angiography has become the foremost noninvasive imaging modality of the coronary arteries and is used as an alternative to the reference standard, conventional coronary angiography, for direct visualizati...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2013-02-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/2/1/13 |
id |
doaj-81d02f47cb974fa59ce0172b60124c79 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Schuetz Georg M Schlattmann Peter Achenbach Stephan Budoff Matthew Garcia Mario J Roehle Robert Pontone Gianluca Meijboom Willem Bob Andreini Daniele Alkadhi Hatem Honoris Lily Bettencourt Nuno Hausleiter Jörg Leschka Sebastian Gerber Bernhard L Meijs Matthijs FL Shabestari Abbas Arjmand Sato Akira Zimmermann Elke Schoepf Uwe J Diederichsen Axel Halon David A Mendoza-Rodriguez Vladimir Hamdan Ashraf Nørgaard Bjarne L Brodoefel Harald Øvrehus Kristian A Jenkins Shona MM Halvorsen Bjørn A Rixe Johannes Sheikh Mehraj Langer Christoph Martuscelli Eugenio Romagnoli Andrea Scholte Arthur JHA Marcus Roy P Ulimoen Geir R Nieman Koen Mickley Hans Nikolaou Konstantin Tardif Jean-Claude Johnson Thorsten RC Muraglia Simone Chow Benjamin JW Maintz David Laule Michael Dewey Marc |
spellingShingle |
Schuetz Georg M Schlattmann Peter Achenbach Stephan Budoff Matthew Garcia Mario J Roehle Robert Pontone Gianluca Meijboom Willem Bob Andreini Daniele Alkadhi Hatem Honoris Lily Bettencourt Nuno Hausleiter Jörg Leschka Sebastian Gerber Bernhard L Meijs Matthijs FL Shabestari Abbas Arjmand Sato Akira Zimmermann Elke Schoepf Uwe J Diederichsen Axel Halon David A Mendoza-Rodriguez Vladimir Hamdan Ashraf Nørgaard Bjarne L Brodoefel Harald Øvrehus Kristian A Jenkins Shona MM Halvorsen Bjørn A Rixe Johannes Sheikh Mehraj Langer Christoph Martuscelli Eugenio Romagnoli Andrea Scholte Arthur JHA Marcus Roy P Ulimoen Geir R Nieman Koen Mickley Hans Nikolaou Konstantin Tardif Jean-Claude Johnson Thorsten RC Muraglia Simone Chow Benjamin JW Maintz David Laule Michael Dewey Marc Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT) Systematic Reviews Collaborative meta-analysis on cardiac CT CoMe-CCT Coronary CT angiography Individual patient data meta-analysis IPD Positive and negative predictive value Pretest likelihood Sensitivity and specificity Study protocol |
author_facet |
Schuetz Georg M Schlattmann Peter Achenbach Stephan Budoff Matthew Garcia Mario J Roehle Robert Pontone Gianluca Meijboom Willem Bob Andreini Daniele Alkadhi Hatem Honoris Lily Bettencourt Nuno Hausleiter Jörg Leschka Sebastian Gerber Bernhard L Meijs Matthijs FL Shabestari Abbas Arjmand Sato Akira Zimmermann Elke Schoepf Uwe J Diederichsen Axel Halon David A Mendoza-Rodriguez Vladimir Hamdan Ashraf Nørgaard Bjarne L Brodoefel Harald Øvrehus Kristian A Jenkins Shona MM Halvorsen Bjørn A Rixe Johannes Sheikh Mehraj Langer Christoph Martuscelli Eugenio Romagnoli Andrea Scholte Arthur JHA Marcus Roy P Ulimoen Geir R Nieman Koen Mickley Hans Nikolaou Konstantin Tardif Jean-Claude Johnson Thorsten RC Muraglia Simone Chow Benjamin JW Maintz David Laule Michael Dewey Marc |
author_sort |
Schuetz Georg M |
title |
Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT) |
title_short |
Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT) |
title_full |
Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT) |
title_fullStr |
Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT) |
title_sort |
individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the collaborative meta-analysis of cardiac ct (come-cct) |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Systematic Reviews |
issn |
2046-4053 |
publishDate |
2013-02-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Coronary computed tomography angiography has become the foremost noninvasive imaging modality of the coronary arteries and is used as an alternative to the reference standard, conventional coronary angiography, for direct visualization and detection of coronary artery stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, there is considerable debate regarding the optimal target population to maximize clinical performance and patient benefit. The most obvious indication for noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease would be to reliably exclude significant stenosis and, thus, avoid unnecessary invasive conventional coronary angiography. To do this, a test should have, at clinically appropriate pretest likelihoods, minimal false-negative outcomes resulting in a high negative predictive value. However, little is known about the influence of patient characteristics on the clinical predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography. Previous regular systematic reviews and meta-analyses had to rely on limited summary patient cohort data offered by primary studies. Performing an individual patient data meta-analysis will enable a much more detailed and powerful analysis and thus increase representativeness and generalizability of the results. The individual patient data meta-analysis is registered with the PROSPERO database (CoMe-CCT, CRD42012002780).</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The analysis will include individual patient data from published and unpublished prospective diagnostic accuracy studies comparing coronary computed tomography angiography with conventional coronary angiography. These studies will be identified performing a systematic search in several electronic databases. Corresponding authors will be contacted and asked to provide obligatory and additional data. Risk factors, previous test results and symptoms of individual patients will be used to estimate the pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease. A bivariate random-effects model will be used to calculate pooled mean negative and positive predictive values as well as sensitivity and specificity. The primary outcome of interest will be positive and negative predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography for the presence of coronary artery disease as a function of pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease, analyzed by meta-regression. As a secondary endpoint, factors that may influence the diagnostic performance and clinical value of computed tomography, such as heart rate and body mass index of patients, number of detector rows, and administration of beta blockade and nitroglycerin, will be investigated by integrating them as further covariates into the bivariate random-effects model.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis should provide answers to the pivotal question of which patients benefit most from noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography and thus help to adequately select the right patients for this test.</p> |
topic |
Collaborative meta-analysis on cardiac CT CoMe-CCT Coronary CT angiography Individual patient data meta-analysis IPD Positive and negative predictive value Pretest likelihood Sensitivity and specificity Study protocol |
url |
http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/2/1/13 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT schuetzgeorgm individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT schlattmannpeter individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT achenbachstephan individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT budoffmatthew individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT garciamarioj individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT roehlerobert individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT pontonegianluca individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT meijboomwillembob individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT andreinidaniele individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT alkadhihatem individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT honorislily individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT bettencourtnuno individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT hausleiterjorg individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT leschkasebastian individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT gerberbernhardl individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT meijsmatthijsfl individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT shabestariabbasarjmand individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT satoakira individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT zimmermannelke individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT schoepfuwej individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT diederichsenaxel individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT halondavida individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT mendozarodriguezvladimir individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT hamdanashraf individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT nørgaardbjarnel individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT brodoefelharald individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT øvrehuskristiana individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT jenkinsshonamm individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT halvorsenbjørna individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT rixejohannes individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT sheikhmehraj individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT langerchristoph individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT martuscellieugenio individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT romagnoliandrea individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT scholtearthurjha individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT marcusroyp individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT ulimoengeirr individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT niemankoen individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT mickleyhans individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT nikolaoukonstantin individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT tardifjeanclaude individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT johnsonthorstenrc individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT muragliasimone individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT chowbenjaminjw individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT maintzdavid individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT laulemichael individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct AT deweymarc individualpatientdatametaanalysisfortheclinicalassessmentofcoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyprotocolofthecollaborativemetaanalysisofcardiacctcomecct |
_version_ |
1716807017058795520 |
spelling |
doaj-81d02f47cb974fa59ce0172b60124c792020-11-24T20:49:02ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532013-02-01211310.1186/2046-4053-2-13Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT)Schuetz Georg MSchlattmann PeterAchenbach StephanBudoff MatthewGarcia Mario JRoehle RobertPontone GianlucaMeijboom Willem BobAndreini DanieleAlkadhi HatemHonoris LilyBettencourt NunoHausleiter JörgLeschka SebastianGerber Bernhard LMeijs Matthijs FLShabestari Abbas ArjmandSato AkiraZimmermann ElkeSchoepf Uwe JDiederichsen AxelHalon David AMendoza-Rodriguez VladimirHamdan AshrafNørgaard Bjarne LBrodoefel HaraldØvrehus Kristian AJenkins Shona MMHalvorsen Bjørn ARixe JohannesSheikh MehrajLanger ChristophMartuscelli EugenioRomagnoli AndreaScholte Arthur JHAMarcus Roy PUlimoen Geir RNieman KoenMickley HansNikolaou KonstantinTardif Jean-ClaudeJohnson Thorsten RCMuraglia SimoneChow Benjamin JWMaintz DavidLaule MichaelDewey Marc<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Coronary computed tomography angiography has become the foremost noninvasive imaging modality of the coronary arteries and is used as an alternative to the reference standard, conventional coronary angiography, for direct visualization and detection of coronary artery stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, there is considerable debate regarding the optimal target population to maximize clinical performance and patient benefit. The most obvious indication for noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease would be to reliably exclude significant stenosis and, thus, avoid unnecessary invasive conventional coronary angiography. To do this, a test should have, at clinically appropriate pretest likelihoods, minimal false-negative outcomes resulting in a high negative predictive value. However, little is known about the influence of patient characteristics on the clinical predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography. Previous regular systematic reviews and meta-analyses had to rely on limited summary patient cohort data offered by primary studies. Performing an individual patient data meta-analysis will enable a much more detailed and powerful analysis and thus increase representativeness and generalizability of the results. The individual patient data meta-analysis is registered with the PROSPERO database (CoMe-CCT, CRD42012002780).</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The analysis will include individual patient data from published and unpublished prospective diagnostic accuracy studies comparing coronary computed tomography angiography with conventional coronary angiography. These studies will be identified performing a systematic search in several electronic databases. Corresponding authors will be contacted and asked to provide obligatory and additional data. Risk factors, previous test results and symptoms of individual patients will be used to estimate the pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease. A bivariate random-effects model will be used to calculate pooled mean negative and positive predictive values as well as sensitivity and specificity. The primary outcome of interest will be positive and negative predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography for the presence of coronary artery disease as a function of pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease, analyzed by meta-regression. As a secondary endpoint, factors that may influence the diagnostic performance and clinical value of computed tomography, such as heart rate and body mass index of patients, number of detector rows, and administration of beta blockade and nitroglycerin, will be investigated by integrating them as further covariates into the bivariate random-effects model.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis should provide answers to the pivotal question of which patients benefit most from noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography and thus help to adequately select the right patients for this test.</p> http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/2/1/13Collaborative meta-analysis on cardiac CTCoMe-CCTCoronary CT angiographyIndividual patient data meta-analysisIPDPositive and negative predictive valuePretest likelihoodSensitivity and specificityStudy protocol |