Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi

Objectives: The most appropriate management of patients with lower-pole calyceal (LC) stones remains controversial. In this review we discuss the role of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the management of LC stones 1-2 cm in maximum dimension. Materials and Methods: A detailed literature revi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Percy Jal Chibber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2008-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2008;volume=24;issue=4;spage=538;epage=543;aulast=Chibber
id doaj-81cfc404dbc9482593d83fb647472a0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81cfc404dbc9482593d83fb647472a0d2020-11-24T23:29:18ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242008-01-0124453854310.4103/0970-1591.44264Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculiPercy Jal ChibberObjectives: The most appropriate management of patients with lower-pole calyceal (LC) stones remains controversial. In this review we discuss the role of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the management of LC stones 1-2 cm in maximum dimension. Materials and Methods: A detailed literature review was performed to summarize the recent technical developments and controversies in PCNL. The results of PCNL for 1-2 cm LC calculi were reviewed. Results: PCNL is increasingly employed as a primary modality in the treatment of LC calculi. It has a high success rate and acceptably low percentage of major complications in experienced hands. Supine position is found to be as safe and effective as prone position. Urologist-acquired access is associated with fewer access-related complications and better stone-free rates. Ultrasound is increasingly employed as an imaging modality for obtaining access. There have been increasing reports of tubeless PCNL in the literature. Most patients undergoing tubeless PCNL do not need hemostatic agents as an adjuvant for hemostasis. Non-contrast computed tomography does not yield statistically valuable increase in the diagnosis of significant residual stones compared with that of plain X-ray and linear tomography. Comprehensive metabolic evaluation and aggressive medical management can control new stone recurrences and growth of residual fragments following PCNL. Conclusions: PCNL is a highly effective procedure with consistently high stone-free rates when compared with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery. The results also do not depend on anatomic factors and stone size. It is associated with low morbidity in experienced hands.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2008;volume=24;issue=4;spage=538;epage=543;aulast=ChibberComplicationslower calyxmanagementpercutaneous nephrolithotomyrenal calculitechnique
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Percy Jal Chibber
spellingShingle Percy Jal Chibber
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi
Indian Journal of Urology
Complications
lower calyx
management
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
renal calculi
technique
author_facet Percy Jal Chibber
author_sort Percy Jal Chibber
title Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi
title_short Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi
title_full Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi
title_fullStr Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi
title_sort percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Urology
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
publishDate 2008-01-01
description Objectives: The most appropriate management of patients with lower-pole calyceal (LC) stones remains controversial. In this review we discuss the role of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the management of LC stones 1-2 cm in maximum dimension. Materials and Methods: A detailed literature review was performed to summarize the recent technical developments and controversies in PCNL. The results of PCNL for 1-2 cm LC calculi were reviewed. Results: PCNL is increasingly employed as a primary modality in the treatment of LC calculi. It has a high success rate and acceptably low percentage of major complications in experienced hands. Supine position is found to be as safe and effective as prone position. Urologist-acquired access is associated with fewer access-related complications and better stone-free rates. Ultrasound is increasingly employed as an imaging modality for obtaining access. There have been increasing reports of tubeless PCNL in the literature. Most patients undergoing tubeless PCNL do not need hemostatic agents as an adjuvant for hemostasis. Non-contrast computed tomography does not yield statistically valuable increase in the diagnosis of significant residual stones compared with that of plain X-ray and linear tomography. Comprehensive metabolic evaluation and aggressive medical management can control new stone recurrences and growth of residual fragments following PCNL. Conclusions: PCNL is a highly effective procedure with consistently high stone-free rates when compared with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery. The results also do not depend on anatomic factors and stone size. It is associated with low morbidity in experienced hands.
topic Complications
lower calyx
management
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
renal calculi
technique
url http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2008;volume=24;issue=4;spage=538;epage=543;aulast=Chibber
work_keys_str_mv AT percyjalchibber percutaneousnephrolithotomyfor12cmlowerpolerenalcalculi
_version_ 1725546280523923456