Improving the biomedical research literature: insights from authors’ editors can help journal editors define and refine their core competencies [version 1; referees: 2 approved]

• Main Authors: Valerie Matarese, Karen Shashok
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2018-01-01
• Series: F1000Research
• Online Access: https://f1000research.com/articles/7-109/v1

A team of stakeholders in biomedical publishing recently proposed a set of core competencies for journal editors, as a resource that can inform training programs for editors and ultimately improve the quality of the biomedical research literature. This initiative, still in its early stages, would benefit from additional sources of expert information. Based on our experiences as authors’ editors, we offer two suggestions on how to strengthen these competencies so that they better respond to the needs of readers and authors – the main users of and contributors to research journals. First, journal editors should be able to ensure that authors are given useful feedback on the language and writing in submitted manuscripts, beyond a (possibly incorrect) blanket judgement of whether the English is “acceptable” or not. Second, journal editors should be able to deal effectively with inappropriate text re-use and plagiarism. These additional competencies would, we believe, be valued by other stakeholders in biomedical research publication as markers of editorial quality.