A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism
Against the backdrop of multiple ongoing crises in European cities related to socio-spatial injustice, inequality and exclusion, we argue for a smart right to the city. There is an urgent need for a thorough account of the entrepreneurial mode of technocapitalist smart urbanism. While much of both a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9590 |
id |
doaj-81cb5d6502eb400e853e6582a469d825 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-81cb5d6502eb400e853e6582a469d8252021-09-09T13:57:36ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-08-01139590959010.3390/su13179590A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart UrbanismAnke Strüver0Rivka Saltiel1Nicolas Schlitz2Bernhard Hohmann3Thomas Höflehner4Barbara Grabher5Department of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaDepartment of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaDepartment of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaRCE Graz-Styria–Centre for Sustainable Social Transformation, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaRCE Graz-Styria–Centre for Sustainable Social Transformation, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaDepartment of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaAgainst the backdrop of multiple ongoing crises in European cities related to socio-spatial injustice, inequality and exclusion, we argue for a smart right to the city. There is an urgent need for a thorough account of the entrepreneurial mode of technocapitalist smart urbanism. While much of both affirmative and critical research on Smart City developments equate or even reduce smartness to digital infrastructures, we put actual smartness—in the sense of social justice and sustainability—at centre stage. This paper builds on a fundamental structural critique of (1) the entrepreneurial city (Harvey) and (2) the capitalist city (Lefebvre). Drawing upon Lefebvre’s right to the city as a normative framework, we use Smart City developments in the city of Graz as an illustration of our argument. Considering strategies of waste and mobility management, we reflect on how they operate as spatial and technical fixes—fixing the limits of capitalism’s growth. By serving specific corporate interests, these technocapitalist strategies yet fail to address the underlying structural causes of pressing urban problems and increasing inequalities. With Lefebvre’s ongoing relevant argument for the importance of use value of urban infrastructures as well as his claim that appropriation and participation are essential, we discuss common rights to the city: His framework allows us to envision sustainable and just—actually smart—alternatives: alternatives to technocapitalist entrepreneurial urbanisation. In this respect, a smart right to the city is oriented towards the everyday needs of all inhabitants.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9590smart urbanismentrepreneurial urbanisationtechnological fixwaste managementmobility infrastructuressocial justice |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anke Strüver Rivka Saltiel Nicolas Schlitz Bernhard Hohmann Thomas Höflehner Barbara Grabher |
spellingShingle |
Anke Strüver Rivka Saltiel Nicolas Schlitz Bernhard Hohmann Thomas Höflehner Barbara Grabher A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism Sustainability smart urbanism entrepreneurial urbanisation technological fix waste management mobility infrastructures social justice |
author_facet |
Anke Strüver Rivka Saltiel Nicolas Schlitz Bernhard Hohmann Thomas Höflehner Barbara Grabher |
author_sort |
Anke Strüver |
title |
A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism |
title_short |
A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism |
title_full |
A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism |
title_fullStr |
A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism |
title_sort |
smart right to the city—grounding corporate storytelling and questioning smart urbanism |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Against the backdrop of multiple ongoing crises in European cities related to socio-spatial injustice, inequality and exclusion, we argue for a smart right to the city. There is an urgent need for a thorough account of the entrepreneurial mode of technocapitalist smart urbanism. While much of both affirmative and critical research on Smart City developments equate or even reduce smartness to digital infrastructures, we put actual smartness—in the sense of social justice and sustainability—at centre stage. This paper builds on a fundamental structural critique of (1) the entrepreneurial city (Harvey) and (2) the capitalist city (Lefebvre). Drawing upon Lefebvre’s right to the city as a normative framework, we use Smart City developments in the city of Graz as an illustration of our argument. Considering strategies of waste and mobility management, we reflect on how they operate as spatial and technical fixes—fixing the limits of capitalism’s growth. By serving specific corporate interests, these technocapitalist strategies yet fail to address the underlying structural causes of pressing urban problems and increasing inequalities. With Lefebvre’s ongoing relevant argument for the importance of use value of urban infrastructures as well as his claim that appropriation and participation are essential, we discuss common rights to the city: His framework allows us to envision sustainable and just—actually smart—alternatives: alternatives to technocapitalist entrepreneurial urbanisation. In this respect, a smart right to the city is oriented towards the everyday needs of all inhabitants. |
topic |
smart urbanism entrepreneurial urbanisation technological fix waste management mobility infrastructures social justice |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9590 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ankestruver asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT rivkasaltiel asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT nicolasschlitz asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT bernhardhohmann asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT thomashoflehner asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT barbaragrabher asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT ankestruver smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT rivkasaltiel smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT nicolasschlitz smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT bernhardhohmann smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT thomashoflehner smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism AT barbaragrabher smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism |
_version_ |
1717759305734684672 |