A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism

Against the backdrop of multiple ongoing crises in European cities related to socio-spatial injustice, inequality and exclusion, we argue for a smart right to the city. There is an urgent need for a thorough account of the entrepreneurial mode of technocapitalist smart urbanism. While much of both a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anke Strüver, Rivka Saltiel, Nicolas Schlitz, Bernhard Hohmann, Thomas Höflehner, Barbara Grabher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9590
id doaj-81cb5d6502eb400e853e6582a469d825
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81cb5d6502eb400e853e6582a469d8252021-09-09T13:57:36ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-08-01139590959010.3390/su13179590A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart UrbanismAnke Strüver0Rivka Saltiel1Nicolas Schlitz2Bernhard Hohmann3Thomas Höflehner4Barbara Grabher5Department of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaDepartment of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaDepartment of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaRCE Graz-Styria–Centre for Sustainable Social Transformation, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaRCE Graz-Styria–Centre for Sustainable Social Transformation, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaDepartment of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, AustriaAgainst the backdrop of multiple ongoing crises in European cities related to socio-spatial injustice, inequality and exclusion, we argue for a smart right to the city. There is an urgent need for a thorough account of the entrepreneurial mode of technocapitalist smart urbanism. While much of both affirmative and critical research on Smart City developments equate or even reduce smartness to digital infrastructures, we put actual smartness—in the sense of social justice and sustainability—at centre stage. This paper builds on a fundamental structural critique of (1) the entrepreneurial city (Harvey) and (2) the capitalist city (Lefebvre). Drawing upon Lefebvre’s right to the city as a normative framework, we use Smart City developments in the city of Graz as an illustration of our argument. Considering strategies of waste and mobility management, we reflect on how they operate as spatial and technical fixes—fixing the limits of capitalism’s growth. By serving specific corporate interests, these technocapitalist strategies yet fail to address the underlying structural causes of pressing urban problems and increasing inequalities. With Lefebvre’s ongoing relevant argument for the importance of use value of urban infrastructures as well as his claim that appropriation and participation are essential, we discuss common rights to the city: His framework allows us to envision sustainable and just—actually smart—alternatives: alternatives to technocapitalist entrepreneurial urbanisation. In this respect, a smart right to the city is oriented towards the everyday needs of all inhabitants.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9590smart urbanismentrepreneurial urbanisationtechnological fixwaste managementmobility infrastructuressocial justice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anke Strüver
Rivka Saltiel
Nicolas Schlitz
Bernhard Hohmann
Thomas Höflehner
Barbara Grabher
spellingShingle Anke Strüver
Rivka Saltiel
Nicolas Schlitz
Bernhard Hohmann
Thomas Höflehner
Barbara Grabher
A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism
Sustainability
smart urbanism
entrepreneurial urbanisation
technological fix
waste management
mobility infrastructures
social justice
author_facet Anke Strüver
Rivka Saltiel
Nicolas Schlitz
Bernhard Hohmann
Thomas Höflehner
Barbara Grabher
author_sort Anke Strüver
title A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism
title_short A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism
title_full A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism
title_fullStr A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism
title_full_unstemmed A Smart Right to the City—Grounding Corporate Storytelling and Questioning Smart Urbanism
title_sort smart right to the city—grounding corporate storytelling and questioning smart urbanism
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Against the backdrop of multiple ongoing crises in European cities related to socio-spatial injustice, inequality and exclusion, we argue for a smart right to the city. There is an urgent need for a thorough account of the entrepreneurial mode of technocapitalist smart urbanism. While much of both affirmative and critical research on Smart City developments equate or even reduce smartness to digital infrastructures, we put actual smartness—in the sense of social justice and sustainability—at centre stage. This paper builds on a fundamental structural critique of (1) the entrepreneurial city (Harvey) and (2) the capitalist city (Lefebvre). Drawing upon Lefebvre’s right to the city as a normative framework, we use Smart City developments in the city of Graz as an illustration of our argument. Considering strategies of waste and mobility management, we reflect on how they operate as spatial and technical fixes—fixing the limits of capitalism’s growth. By serving specific corporate interests, these technocapitalist strategies yet fail to address the underlying structural causes of pressing urban problems and increasing inequalities. With Lefebvre’s ongoing relevant argument for the importance of use value of urban infrastructures as well as his claim that appropriation and participation are essential, we discuss common rights to the city: His framework allows us to envision sustainable and just—actually smart—alternatives: alternatives to technocapitalist entrepreneurial urbanisation. In this respect, a smart right to the city is oriented towards the everyday needs of all inhabitants.
topic smart urbanism
entrepreneurial urbanisation
technological fix
waste management
mobility infrastructures
social justice
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9590
work_keys_str_mv AT ankestruver asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT rivkasaltiel asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT nicolasschlitz asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT bernhardhohmann asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT thomashoflehner asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT barbaragrabher asmartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT ankestruver smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT rivkasaltiel smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT nicolasschlitz smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT bernhardhohmann smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT thomashoflehner smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
AT barbaragrabher smartrighttothecitygroundingcorporatestorytellingandquestioningsmarturbanism
_version_ 1717759305734684672