Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples

Although some research effort has been devoted to the comparison of probability- and nonprobability-based Web surveys, different types of nonprobability-based samples have not been thoroughly examined. This exploratory study compares the data quality between online panel and intercept samples. Onlin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mingnan Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-10-01
Series:Methodological Innovations
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116672877
id doaj-81c050d178b54f208b589e77703fc36b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81c050d178b54f208b589e77703fc36b2020-11-25T03:16:19ZengSAGE PublishingMethodological Innovations2059-79912016-10-01910.1177/2059799116672877Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samplesMingnan LiuAlthough some research effort has been devoted to the comparison of probability- and nonprobability-based Web surveys, different types of nonprobability-based samples have not been thoroughly examined. This exploratory study compares the data quality between online panel and intercept samples. Online panel refers to a pre-recruited and profiled pool of respondents. An intercept sample is a pool of respondents that are obtained through banners, ads, or promotions. Anyone can click on them and subsequently respond to a survey. Respondents are not pre-recruited or profiled. Three surveys with 52, 29, and 19 questions, respectively, were administered to both samples. Propensity score weighting adjustment is used for the analyses. The results show that the completion rates are higher for the panel than the intercept sample. The completion times are similar for these two samples. Data quality, on average, tends to be higher for panel than intercept samples.https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116672877
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mingnan Liu
spellingShingle Mingnan Liu
Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
Methodological Innovations
author_facet Mingnan Liu
author_sort Mingnan Liu
title Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
title_short Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
title_full Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
title_fullStr Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
title_sort comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Methodological Innovations
issn 2059-7991
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Although some research effort has been devoted to the comparison of probability- and nonprobability-based Web surveys, different types of nonprobability-based samples have not been thoroughly examined. This exploratory study compares the data quality between online panel and intercept samples. Online panel refers to a pre-recruited and profiled pool of respondents. An intercept sample is a pool of respondents that are obtained through banners, ads, or promotions. Anyone can click on them and subsequently respond to a survey. Respondents are not pre-recruited or profiled. Three surveys with 52, 29, and 19 questions, respectively, were administered to both samples. Propensity score weighting adjustment is used for the analyses. The results show that the completion rates are higher for the panel than the intercept sample. The completion times are similar for these two samples. Data quality, on average, tends to be higher for panel than intercept samples.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116672877
work_keys_str_mv AT mingnanliu comparingdataqualitybetweenonlinepanelandinterceptsamples
_version_ 1724636881294983168