Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: Thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of an upper body compression garment (UBCG) on thermoregulatory responses during cycling in a controlled laboratory thermoneutral environment (~23°C). A secondary aim was to determine the cardiovascular and perceptual responses when...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Sport and Health Science |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254616000090 |
id |
doaj-81af9b7d266843a6b3322bf62c983b86 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-81af9b7d266843a6b3322bf62c983b862020-11-25T00:44:16ZengElsevierJournal of Sport and Health Science2095-25462019-09-0185450456Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: Thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responsesIker Leoz-Abaurrea0Nicholas Tam1Roberto Aguado-Jiménez2Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, Navarre 31500, Spain; Corresponding author.UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7725, South AfricaDepartment of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, Navarre 31500, SpainPurpose: The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of an upper body compression garment (UBCG) on thermoregulatory responses during cycling in a controlled laboratory thermoneutral environment (~23°C). A secondary aim was to determine the cardiovascular and perceptual responses when wearing the garment. Methods: Sixteen untrained participants (age: 21.3 ± 5.7 years; peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak): 50.88 ± 8.00 mL/min/kg; mean ± SD) performed 2 cycling trials in a thermoneutral environment (~23°C) wearing either UBCG or control (Con) garment. Testing consisted of a 5-min rest on a cycle ergometer, followed by 4 bouts of cycling for 14-min at ~50%VO2peak, with 1-min rest between each bout. At the end of these bouts there was 10-min of passive recovery. During the entire protocol rectal temperature (Trec), skin temperature (Tskin), mean body temperature (Tbody), and heat storage (HS) were measured. Heart rate (HR), VO2, pH, hematocrit (Hct), plasma electrolytes, weight loss (Wloss), and perceptual responses were also measured. Results: There were no significant differences between garments for Tskin, HS, HR, VO2, pH, Hct, plasma electrolyte concentration, Wloss, and perceptual responses during the trial. Trec did not differ between garment conditions during rest, exercise, or recovery although a greater reduction in Trec wearing UBCG (p = 0.01) was observed during recovery. Lower Tbody during recovery was found when wearing UBCG (36.82°C ± 0.30°C vs. 36.99°C ± 0.24°C). Conclusion: Wearing a UBCG did not benefit thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses during exercise although it was found to lower Tbody during recovery, which suggests that it could be used as a recovery tool after exercise. Keywords: Body temperature, Compression garment, Cycling, Heat dissipation, Thermoregulationhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254616000090 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Iker Leoz-Abaurrea Nicholas Tam Roberto Aguado-Jiménez |
spellingShingle |
Iker Leoz-Abaurrea Nicholas Tam Roberto Aguado-Jiménez Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: Thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses Journal of Sport and Health Science |
author_facet |
Iker Leoz-Abaurrea Nicholas Tam Roberto Aguado-Jiménez |
author_sort |
Iker Leoz-Abaurrea |
title |
Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: Thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses |
title_short |
Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: Thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses |
title_full |
Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: Thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses |
title_fullStr |
Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: Thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Heat dissipating upper body compression garment: Thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses |
title_sort |
heat dissipating upper body compression garment: thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Journal of Sport and Health Science |
issn |
2095-2546 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of an upper body compression garment (UBCG) on thermoregulatory responses during cycling in a controlled laboratory thermoneutral environment (~23°C). A secondary aim was to determine the cardiovascular and perceptual responses when wearing the garment. Methods: Sixteen untrained participants (age: 21.3 ± 5.7 years; peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak): 50.88 ± 8.00 mL/min/kg; mean ± SD) performed 2 cycling trials in a thermoneutral environment (~23°C) wearing either UBCG or control (Con) garment. Testing consisted of a 5-min rest on a cycle ergometer, followed by 4 bouts of cycling for 14-min at ~50%VO2peak, with 1-min rest between each bout. At the end of these bouts there was 10-min of passive recovery. During the entire protocol rectal temperature (Trec), skin temperature (Tskin), mean body temperature (Tbody), and heat storage (HS) were measured. Heart rate (HR), VO2, pH, hematocrit (Hct), plasma electrolytes, weight loss (Wloss), and perceptual responses were also measured. Results: There were no significant differences between garments for Tskin, HS, HR, VO2, pH, Hct, plasma electrolyte concentration, Wloss, and perceptual responses during the trial. Trec did not differ between garment conditions during rest, exercise, or recovery although a greater reduction in Trec wearing UBCG (p = 0.01) was observed during recovery. Lower Tbody during recovery was found when wearing UBCG (36.82°C ± 0.30°C vs. 36.99°C ± 0.24°C). Conclusion: Wearing a UBCG did not benefit thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual responses during exercise although it was found to lower Tbody during recovery, which suggests that it could be used as a recovery tool after exercise. Keywords: Body temperature, Compression garment, Cycling, Heat dissipation, Thermoregulation |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254616000090 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ikerleozabaurrea heatdissipatingupperbodycompressiongarmentthermoregulatorycardiovascularandperceptualresponses AT nicholastam heatdissipatingupperbodycompressiongarmentthermoregulatorycardiovascularandperceptualresponses AT robertoaguadojimenez heatdissipatingupperbodycompressiongarmentthermoregulatorycardiovascularandperceptualresponses |
_version_ |
1725275331644882944 |