Verdelgen of verheffen? De evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mens
<p><strong><em>To elevate or to exterminate? Evolution theory and the ‘Man’s ability to be transformed’<br /></em></strong>Around 1900, Belgian scientists from different disciplines were tempted to use the theory of evolution as a tool to make pronouncements about...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Journals
2007-01-01
|
Series: | BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/6665 |
id |
doaj-81ad89787954409587171cbe71e9301c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-81ad89787954409587171cbe71e9301c2021-10-02T07:53:11ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982007-01-01122450351810.18352/bmgn-lchr.66656633Verdelgen of verheffen? De evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mensR. de Bont<p><strong><em>To elevate or to exterminate? Evolution theory and the ‘Man’s ability to be transformed’<br /></em></strong>Around 1900, Belgian scientists from different disciplines were tempted to use the theory of evolution as a tool to make pronouncements about the ‘Man’s ability to be transformed’. Although<em> </em>some biologists did examine this issue, it was primarily sociologists, anthropologists, educationalists, criminologists and eugenicists who used biological language to tackle the question. In this article I argue that these commentators can be divided into two groups: the determinists and the voluntarists. The first tended to believe in an evolution that was determined by an insurmountable struggle for life.</p><p> </p><p>A larger group of voluntarists, however, believed human evolution could be adjusted by changing the milieu in which people lived. In spite of this difference, the two groups also had a lot in common. Both used biological terminology to argue for a new type of government, which was completely ‘objective’ and ‘scientific’. In this way, both became defenders of what can be described as a ‘depoliticization’ of politics.</p><p> </p><p>This article is part of the special issue '<a href="/412/volume/122/issue/4/">De menselijke canon en de Lage Landen</a>'.</p>https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/6665Science, history of |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
R. de Bont |
spellingShingle |
R. de Bont Verdelgen of verheffen? De evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mens BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review Science, history of |
author_facet |
R. de Bont |
author_sort |
R. de Bont |
title |
Verdelgen of verheffen? De evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mens |
title_short |
Verdelgen of verheffen? De evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mens |
title_full |
Verdelgen of verheffen? De evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mens |
title_fullStr |
Verdelgen of verheffen? De evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mens |
title_full_unstemmed |
Verdelgen of verheffen? De evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mens |
title_sort |
verdelgen of verheffen? de evolutietheorie en de maakbaarheid van de mens |
publisher |
Open Journals |
series |
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review |
issn |
0165-0505 2211-2898 |
publishDate |
2007-01-01 |
description |
<p><strong><em>To elevate or to exterminate? Evolution theory and the ‘Man’s ability to be transformed’<br /></em></strong>Around 1900, Belgian scientists from different disciplines were tempted to use the theory of evolution as a tool to make pronouncements about the ‘Man’s ability to be transformed’. Although<em> </em>some biologists did examine this issue, it was primarily sociologists, anthropologists, educationalists, criminologists and eugenicists who used biological language to tackle the question. In this article I argue that these commentators can be divided into two groups: the determinists and the voluntarists. The first tended to believe in an evolution that was determined by an insurmountable struggle for life.</p><p> </p><p>A larger group of voluntarists, however, believed human evolution could be adjusted by changing the milieu in which people lived. In spite of this difference, the two groups also had a lot in common. Both used biological terminology to argue for a new type of government, which was completely ‘objective’ and ‘scientific’. In this way, both became defenders of what can be described as a ‘depoliticization’ of politics.</p><p> </p><p>This article is part of the special issue '<a href="/412/volume/122/issue/4/">De menselijke canon en de Lage Landen</a>'.</p> |
topic |
Science, history of |
url |
https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/6665 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rdebont verdelgenofverheffendeevolutietheorieendemaakbaarheidvandemens |
_version_ |
1716857301736882176 |