Emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilation

Agriculture, especially animal husbandry, is a major source of the greenhouse gas methane as well as the gas ammonia. In order to develop reduction measures for emissions and immissions, two factors prove to be: firstly, to determine the emission mass flow from livestock buildings, and secondly, to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.M. Fiedler, H.-J. Müller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Borntraeger 2011-02-01
Series:Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0490
id doaj-81a6318078c74a31b606585211ef8a20
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81a6318078c74a31b606585211ef8a202020-11-24T23:29:31ZengBorntraegerMeteorologische Zeitschrift0941-29482011-02-01201596510.1127/0941-2948/2011/049075683Emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilationA.M. FiedlerH.-J. MüllerAgriculture, especially animal husbandry, is a major source of the greenhouse gas methane as well as the gas ammonia. In order to develop reduction measures for emissions and immissions, two factors prove to be: firstly, to determine the emission mass flow from livestock buildings, and secondly, to understand the dispersion processes in its surroundings. The quantification of emissions from livestock buildings with naturally ventilation is a particularly difficult task. The experimental uncertainties are largely unknown but are expected to be considerable. Using poor quality emission data as model input in dispersion studies (wind tunnel or numerical simulations) will produce results with limited significance. Accordingly a field study has been conducted to quantify the emission mass flow from naturally ventilated livestock buildings. During two field campaigns in summer tracer gas experiments and measurements of gas concentrations within and around two naturally ventilated cow sheds in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern were carried out, in order to estimate the emission mass flow. It was found that the measured concentrations within the livestock building strongly depend on outside conditions such as e.g. the wind direction. Large uncertainties also arise from estimates of the air ventilation rate, which determines the emission mass flow. The data analysis shows high estimated ventilation rates of 1280-1380 m3/h/LU (1 LU = 500kg body weight) for cow shed 1 and 1140-1180 m3/h/LU for cow shed 2. These results suggest ammonia emission mass flow rates of about 4 g/h/LU for cow shed 1 and about 2 g/h/LU for cow shed 2, respectively.http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0490
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A.M. Fiedler
H.-J. Müller
spellingShingle A.M. Fiedler
H.-J. Müller
Emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilation
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
author_facet A.M. Fiedler
H.-J. Müller
author_sort A.M. Fiedler
title Emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilation
title_short Emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilation
title_full Emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilation
title_fullStr Emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilation
title_sort emissions of ammonia and methane from a livestock building natural cross ventilation
publisher Borntraeger
series Meteorologische Zeitschrift
issn 0941-2948
publishDate 2011-02-01
description Agriculture, especially animal husbandry, is a major source of the greenhouse gas methane as well as the gas ammonia. In order to develop reduction measures for emissions and immissions, two factors prove to be: firstly, to determine the emission mass flow from livestock buildings, and secondly, to understand the dispersion processes in its surroundings. The quantification of emissions from livestock buildings with naturally ventilation is a particularly difficult task. The experimental uncertainties are largely unknown but are expected to be considerable. Using poor quality emission data as model input in dispersion studies (wind tunnel or numerical simulations) will produce results with limited significance. Accordingly a field study has been conducted to quantify the emission mass flow from naturally ventilated livestock buildings. During two field campaigns in summer tracer gas experiments and measurements of gas concentrations within and around two naturally ventilated cow sheds in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern were carried out, in order to estimate the emission mass flow. It was found that the measured concentrations within the livestock building strongly depend on outside conditions such as e.g. the wind direction. Large uncertainties also arise from estimates of the air ventilation rate, which determines the emission mass flow. The data analysis shows high estimated ventilation rates of 1280-1380 m3/h/LU (1 LU = 500kg body weight) for cow shed 1 and 1140-1180 m3/h/LU for cow shed 2. These results suggest ammonia emission mass flow rates of about 4 g/h/LU for cow shed 1 and about 2 g/h/LU for cow shed 2, respectively.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0490
work_keys_str_mv AT amfiedler emissionsofammoniaandmethanefromalivestockbuildingnaturalcrossventilation
AT hjmuller emissionsofammoniaandmethanefromalivestockbuildingnaturalcrossventilation
_version_ 1725545152848592896