Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures
We develop an endogenous growth model with human capital accumulation in which firms are polluting and heterogeneous individuals must decide, among other things, where to live. The main idea is that pollution is unequally spread across geographical locations, inducing a trade-off for individuals be...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Technological and Economic Development of Economy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/TEDE/article/view/4320 |
id |
doaj-818d56a3d9db46cda83c7dd9ac5a72ee |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-818d56a3d9db46cda83c7dd9ac5a72ee2021-07-02T01:23:26ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityTechnological and Economic Development of Economy2029-49132029-49212014-01-0119110.3846/20294913.2013.869668Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposuresHoang Khac Lich0Frédéric Tournemaine1University of Economics and Bussiness, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 144 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi, VietnamSchool of Economics, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, 126/1 Vibhavadee-Rangsit Road, Dindaeng, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand We develop an endogenous growth model with human capital accumulation in which firms are polluting and heterogeneous individuals must decide, among other things, where to live. The main idea is that pollution is unequally spread across geographical locations, inducing a trade-off for individuals between environmental quality and leisure. In such economy, we show that a better environmental quality and/or a greater degree of inequality lead individuals to favour cleaner locations which, in turn, boosts long-term growth. Welfare-wise, we find that, in general, individuals prefer a greater level of consumption and leisure but lower growth and environmental quality than those which are possible to achieve. Moreover, we show that the sign of the impact of inequality on environmental quality is likely to be negative. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/TEDE/article/view/4320location choicegrowthinequalitywelfareenvironmental quality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hoang Khac Lich Frédéric Tournemaine |
spellingShingle |
Hoang Khac Lich Frédéric Tournemaine Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures Technological and Economic Development of Economy location choice growth inequality welfare environmental quality |
author_facet |
Hoang Khac Lich Frédéric Tournemaine |
author_sort |
Hoang Khac Lich |
title |
Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures |
title_short |
Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures |
title_full |
Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures |
title_fullStr |
Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures |
title_sort |
choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures |
publisher |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University |
series |
Technological and Economic Development of Economy |
issn |
2029-4913 2029-4921 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
We develop an endogenous growth model with human capital accumulation in which firms are polluting and heterogeneous individuals must decide, among other things, where to live. The main idea is that pollution is unequally spread across geographical locations, inducing a trade-off for individuals between environmental quality and leisure. In such economy, we show that a better environmental quality and/or a greater degree of inequality lead individuals to favour cleaner locations which, in turn, boosts long-term growth. Welfare-wise, we find that, in general, individuals prefer a greater level of consumption and leisure but lower growth and environmental quality than those which are possible to achieve. Moreover, we show that the sign of the impact of inequality on environmental quality is likely to be negative.
|
topic |
location choice growth inequality welfare environmental quality |
url |
https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/TEDE/article/view/4320 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hoangkhaclich choiceoflocationgrowthandwelfarewithunequalpollutionexposures AT frederictournemaine choiceoflocationgrowthandwelfarewithunequalpollutionexposures |
_version_ |
1721345099034525696 |