Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures

We develop an endogenous growth model with human capital accumulation in which firms are polluting and heterogeneous individuals must decide, among other things, where to live. The main idea is that pollution is unequally spread across geographical locations, inducing a trade-off for individuals be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoang Khac Lich, Frédéric Tournemaine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2014-01-01
Series:Technological and Economic Development of Economy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/TEDE/article/view/4320
id doaj-818d56a3d9db46cda83c7dd9ac5a72ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-818d56a3d9db46cda83c7dd9ac5a72ee2021-07-02T01:23:26ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityTechnological and Economic Development of Economy2029-49132029-49212014-01-0119110.3846/20294913.2013.869668Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposuresHoang Khac Lich0Frédéric Tournemaine1University of Economics and Bussiness, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 144 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi, VietnamSchool of Economics, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, 126/1 Vibhavadee-Rangsit Road, Dindaeng, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand We develop an endogenous growth model with human capital accumulation in which firms are polluting and heterogeneous individuals must decide, among other things, where to live. The main idea is that pollution is unequally spread across geographical locations, inducing a trade-off for individuals between environmental quality and leisure. In such economy, we show that a better environmental quality and/or a greater degree of inequality lead individuals to favour cleaner locations which, in turn, boosts long-term growth. Welfare-wise, we find that, in general, individuals prefer a greater level of consumption and leisure but lower growth and environmental quality than those which are possible to achieve. Moreover, we show that the sign of the impact of inequality on environmental quality is likely to be negative. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/TEDE/article/view/4320location choicegrowthinequalitywelfareenvironmental quality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hoang Khac Lich
Frédéric Tournemaine
spellingShingle Hoang Khac Lich
Frédéric Tournemaine
Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures
Technological and Economic Development of Economy
location choice
growth
inequality
welfare
environmental quality
author_facet Hoang Khac Lich
Frédéric Tournemaine
author_sort Hoang Khac Lich
title Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures
title_short Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures
title_full Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures
title_fullStr Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures
title_full_unstemmed Choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures
title_sort choice of location, growth and welfare with unequal pollution exposures
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series Technological and Economic Development of Economy
issn 2029-4913
2029-4921
publishDate 2014-01-01
description We develop an endogenous growth model with human capital accumulation in which firms are polluting and heterogeneous individuals must decide, among other things, where to live. The main idea is that pollution is unequally spread across geographical locations, inducing a trade-off for individuals between environmental quality and leisure. In such economy, we show that a better environmental quality and/or a greater degree of inequality lead individuals to favour cleaner locations which, in turn, boosts long-term growth. Welfare-wise, we find that, in general, individuals prefer a greater level of consumption and leisure but lower growth and environmental quality than those which are possible to achieve. Moreover, we show that the sign of the impact of inequality on environmental quality is likely to be negative.
topic location choice
growth
inequality
welfare
environmental quality
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/TEDE/article/view/4320
work_keys_str_mv AT hoangkhaclich choiceoflocationgrowthandwelfarewithunequalpollutionexposures
AT frederictournemaine choiceoflocationgrowthandwelfarewithunequalpollutionexposures
_version_ 1721345099034525696