Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation

Throughout the Midwestern US, many public lands set aside for conservation engage in management activities (e.g., agriculture) that may act as stressors on wild bee populations. Several studies have investigated how wild bees respond to large-scale agriculture production; however, there has been lim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anson R. Main, Elisabeth B. Webb, Keith W. Goyne, Doreen Mengel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-01-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989418304633
id doaj-817dae4195364eb1895a67cc9945d8f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-817dae4195364eb1895a67cc9945d8f32020-11-25T00:10:24ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942019-01-0117Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservationAnson R. Main0Elisabeth B. Webb1Keith W. Goyne2Doreen Mengel3School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Corresponding author. Environmental Monitoring Branch, California Dept. of Pesticide Regulation, 1001 I St, P.O. Box 4015, Sacramento, CA, 95812, USA.U.S. Geological Survey, Missouri Cooperative Research Unit, Columbia, MO, USA; School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USASchool of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USAMissouri Department of Conservation, Resource Science Division, Columbia, MO, USAThroughout the Midwestern US, many public lands set aside for conservation engage in management activities (e.g., agriculture) that may act as stressors on wild bee populations. Several studies have investigated how wild bees respond to large-scale agriculture production; however, there has been limited assessment of how wild bees may be impacted by agricultural activity on public lands or how local variables may influence bee communities in these same areas. In this study, we assessed the abundance and richness of wild bee floral and nesting guilds at 30 agricultural field margins located on five Conservation Areas in Missouri. Generally, regardless of guild, bee abundance and richness was greater in field margins with more floral diversity and taller vegetation. Bee guilds responded negatively to agricultural production in Conservation Areas with fewer soil- and cavity-nesting bees collected in margins adjacent to annually cropped fields. Although fewer diet specialists were collected, specialist bee abundance and richness was greater in margins near fields that were uncropped (i.e., vegetated, but not row-cropped) during the previous year. Overall, the percentage of trees and shrubs within 800 m of study fields (i.e., “woodland”) was negatively associated with abundance and richness of bees, but specifically, reduced richness of soil-nesters and diet specialists. Our findings indicate agricultural management activities on public lands may lead to decreased abundance and richness of wild bee guilds. If public lands are to be managed for species diversity, including wild bees, maintaining diverse plant communities with taller vegetation (>100 cm) near cultivated fields and/or modifying agricultural production practices on public lands may greatly improve the conservation of local bee communities. Keywords: Bee guilds, Abundance, Richness, Conservation areas, Field margins, Agroecosystemshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989418304633
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anson R. Main
Elisabeth B. Webb
Keith W. Goyne
Doreen Mengel
spellingShingle Anson R. Main
Elisabeth B. Webb
Keith W. Goyne
Doreen Mengel
Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation
author_facet Anson R. Main
Elisabeth B. Webb
Keith W. Goyne
Doreen Mengel
author_sort Anson R. Main
title Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation
title_short Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation
title_full Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation
title_fullStr Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation
title_full_unstemmed Field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation
title_sort field-level characteristics influence wild bee functional guilds on public lands managed for conservation
publisher Elsevier
series Global Ecology and Conservation
issn 2351-9894
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Throughout the Midwestern US, many public lands set aside for conservation engage in management activities (e.g., agriculture) that may act as stressors on wild bee populations. Several studies have investigated how wild bees respond to large-scale agriculture production; however, there has been limited assessment of how wild bees may be impacted by agricultural activity on public lands or how local variables may influence bee communities in these same areas. In this study, we assessed the abundance and richness of wild bee floral and nesting guilds at 30 agricultural field margins located on five Conservation Areas in Missouri. Generally, regardless of guild, bee abundance and richness was greater in field margins with more floral diversity and taller vegetation. Bee guilds responded negatively to agricultural production in Conservation Areas with fewer soil- and cavity-nesting bees collected in margins adjacent to annually cropped fields. Although fewer diet specialists were collected, specialist bee abundance and richness was greater in margins near fields that were uncropped (i.e., vegetated, but not row-cropped) during the previous year. Overall, the percentage of trees and shrubs within 800 m of study fields (i.e., “woodland”) was negatively associated with abundance and richness of bees, but specifically, reduced richness of soil-nesters and diet specialists. Our findings indicate agricultural management activities on public lands may lead to decreased abundance and richness of wild bee guilds. If public lands are to be managed for species diversity, including wild bees, maintaining diverse plant communities with taller vegetation (>100 cm) near cultivated fields and/or modifying agricultural production practices on public lands may greatly improve the conservation of local bee communities. Keywords: Bee guilds, Abundance, Richness, Conservation areas, Field margins, Agroecosystems
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989418304633
work_keys_str_mv AT ansonrmain fieldlevelcharacteristicsinfluencewildbeefunctionalguildsonpubliclandsmanagedforconservation
AT elisabethbwebb fieldlevelcharacteristicsinfluencewildbeefunctionalguildsonpubliclandsmanagedforconservation
AT keithwgoyne fieldlevelcharacteristicsinfluencewildbeefunctionalguildsonpubliclandsmanagedforconservation
AT doreenmengel fieldlevelcharacteristicsinfluencewildbeefunctionalguildsonpubliclandsmanagedforconservation
_version_ 1725407652670865408