Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Tarannum Mansoori
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:	Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:	http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=9;spage=1508;epage=1508;aulast=

Similar Items

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry
by: Ertugrul Can, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry
by: Ertugrul Can, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by three optical measurement devices with ultrasound pachymetry
by: Duo Peng, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
by: Ladi Jeevan, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Pentacam and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Myopic Patients
by: Sherif Emerah, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Ultrasonic Pachymetry and Orbscan II Corneal Topography and Evaluation of Ultrasonic Pachymetry Repeatability
by: Semra Tiryaki Demir, et al.
Published: (2014-08-01)

Measurement of central corneal thickness using ultrasound pachymetry and Orbscan II in normal eyes
by: Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis-2 VHF scanner in normal eyes
by: Al-Farhan HM, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01)

Precision of Corneal Thickness Measurements Obtained Using the Scheimpflug-Placido Imaging and Agreement with Ultrasound Pachymetry
by: Jinhai Huang, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Ultrasound Pachymetry
by: Prasanna Venkatesh Ramesh, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement with Sirius Topographer and Nidek Axial Length Scan
by: Tarannum Mansoori
Published: (2018-01-01)

Correspondence: Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Ultrasound Pachymetry
by: Maddalena De Bernardo, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Sirius Scheimpflug–Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis
by: Yili Jin, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry After Micro-Coaxial Cataract Surgery
by: Erhan Özyol, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography, pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry
by: Wei Zhao, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry and the other two optical measuring instruments
by: Huan-Ming Zhou, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness using non-contact tono-pachymeter (Tonopachy) with ultrasound pachymetry in normal children and in children with refractive error
by: Kiruthikadevi Thiagarajan, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan
by: Khaja WA, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

Comparison of Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasonic Pachymetry for Assessment of Central Corneal Thickness
by: G. Ertuğrul Mirza
Published: (2014-08-01)

Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes
by: Ayong Yu, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease
by: Ali Riza Cenk Celebi, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Intrasession repeatability of pachymetry measurements with RTVue XR 100 optical coherence tomography in normal cornea
by: Tarannum Mansoori, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography
by: Wongchaisuwat N, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Comparison of corneal elevation and pachymetry measurements made by two state of the art corneal tomographers with different measurement principles.
by: Simon Schröder, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices
by: Mehmet Barış Üçer, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Comparison of anterior chamber depths measured using the Pentacam, the IOLMaster, and ultrasound pachymetry
by: Jing Zhang, et al.
Published: (2015-08-01)

Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymetry, rotating scheimpflug camera, and scanning-slit topography exclusively in thin non-keratoconic corneas
by: Mehrdad Mohammadpour, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Central Corneal Thickness in Highly Myopic Eyes: Inter-device Agreement of Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Pentacam and Orbscan II Before and After Photorefractive Keratectomy
by: Nader Nassiri, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Central corneal thickness measurement with different devices in keratoconic patients
by: Maddalena De Bernardo, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using the Lenstar, Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry methods in cataract patients
by: Jing Zhang, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01)

Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry, with a new optical biometry and tono-pachymetry
by: Haci Murat Sagdik, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

Central Corneal Thickness Measurement by Ultrasound versus Orbscan II
by: Amir Faramarzi, et al.
Published: (2008-12-01)

Corneal pachymetry by AS-OCT after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
by: Friso G. Heslinga, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
by: Xiaorui Wang, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Clinical significance of central corneal thickness and comparison of central corneal thickness
by: Özgür Çakıcı
Published: (2014-03-01)

Comparison of three different instruments measuring central corneal thickness of keratoconus
by: Xu Pang, et al.
Published: (2013-10-01)

Measurement of central corneal thickness by different techniques
by: Reem Hassan Ibrahim Azzam, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices
by: Laszlo Kiraly, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Assessment of Corneal Pachymetry Distribution and Morphologic Changes in Subclinical Keratoconus with Normal Biomechanics
by: Peng Song, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.
by: Hasan Ali Bayhan, et al.
Published: (2014-04-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_f61dm3dn39tu5ovhaklti7j3fh