METAPHORIZATION OF ALLUSIVE PROPER NAMES: SECONDARY NOMINATIONS

Ukrainian modern artistic discourse is characterized by the use of non-traditional means of artistic reality modelling that is reflected in the complex superstructures verbalized in narrative forms and with the help of intertextual persuasions. In the verbal palette of artistic modeling an important...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Х. В. Петрина
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: Odessa I. I. Mechnykov National University 2017-06-01
Series:Записки з українського мовознавства
Subjects:
Online Access:http://zum.onu.edu.ua/article/view/131372
id doaj-816e89c34e6b4ba28f98a812a645d3a2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-816e89c34e6b4ba28f98a812a645d3a22021-01-27T08:40:27ZbulOdessa I. I. Mechnykov National UniversityЗаписки з українського мовознавства2414-06272415-75622017-06-0112414815510.18524/2414-0627.2017.24.131372131372METAPHORIZATION OF ALLUSIVE PROPER NAMES: SECONDARY NOMINATIONSХ. В. Петрина0Прикарпатський національний університет імені Василя СтефаникаUkrainian modern artistic discourse is characterized by the use of non-traditional means of artistic reality modelling that is reflected in the complex superstructures verbalized in narrative forms and with the help of intertextual persuasions. In the verbal palette of artistic modeling an important role is given to allusive proper names. The purpose is to to explore the ways and processes of metaphorical potential of appellatives and to highlight the differences between comparative and metaphorical potential of allusive names. The article deals with the actual problem of metaphorical rethinking of allusive names from the position of the cognitive linguistics and the intertextuality theory. Characteristically, the process of actualization of a proper name as a metaphorical structure is determined by its own principles. To these principles we include: 1) the principle of categorical transposition (characterized by the transition from one conceptual category to another) and the principle of seme redistribution (involves archiseme change, positional transformation of denotative semes (core-periphery / periphery-core) and augment of connotative seme’s-indicators (actual semes (often supplemented by associative elements)), as a result, we have a secondary nomination of a proper name. So, we can come to the conclusion, that the metaphorical nature of allusive proper name is determined by the following processes: 1) the metaphorical models are one of the means of material construction of allusive units; 2) a high degree of metaphor’s associativity and metaphorical meanings of elements reflect the conceptual sphere of allusive names.http://zum.onu.edu.ua/article/view/131372алюзійне ім’яметафоравторинна номінаціямовна дійсністьтекстдискурс
collection DOAJ
language Bulgarian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Х. В. Петрина
spellingShingle Х. В. Петрина
METAPHORIZATION OF ALLUSIVE PROPER NAMES: SECONDARY NOMINATIONS
Записки з українського мовознавства
алюзійне ім’я
метафора
вторинна номінація
мовна дійсність
текст
дискурс
author_facet Х. В. Петрина
author_sort Х. В. Петрина
title METAPHORIZATION OF ALLUSIVE PROPER NAMES: SECONDARY NOMINATIONS
title_short METAPHORIZATION OF ALLUSIVE PROPER NAMES: SECONDARY NOMINATIONS
title_full METAPHORIZATION OF ALLUSIVE PROPER NAMES: SECONDARY NOMINATIONS
title_fullStr METAPHORIZATION OF ALLUSIVE PROPER NAMES: SECONDARY NOMINATIONS
title_full_unstemmed METAPHORIZATION OF ALLUSIVE PROPER NAMES: SECONDARY NOMINATIONS
title_sort metaphorization of allusive proper names: secondary nominations
publisher Odessa I. I. Mechnykov National University
series Записки з українського мовознавства
issn 2414-0627
2415-7562
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Ukrainian modern artistic discourse is characterized by the use of non-traditional means of artistic reality modelling that is reflected in the complex superstructures verbalized in narrative forms and with the help of intertextual persuasions. In the verbal palette of artistic modeling an important role is given to allusive proper names. The purpose is to to explore the ways and processes of metaphorical potential of appellatives and to highlight the differences between comparative and metaphorical potential of allusive names. The article deals with the actual problem of metaphorical rethinking of allusive names from the position of the cognitive linguistics and the intertextuality theory. Characteristically, the process of actualization of a proper name as a metaphorical structure is determined by its own principles. To these principles we include: 1) the principle of categorical transposition (characterized by the transition from one conceptual category to another) and the principle of seme redistribution (involves archiseme change, positional transformation of denotative semes (core-periphery / periphery-core) and augment of connotative seme’s-indicators (actual semes (often supplemented by associative elements)), as a result, we have a secondary nomination of a proper name. So, we can come to the conclusion, that the metaphorical nature of allusive proper name is determined by the following processes: 1) the metaphorical models are one of the means of material construction of allusive units; 2) a high degree of metaphor’s associativity and metaphorical meanings of elements reflect the conceptual sphere of allusive names.
topic алюзійне ім’я
метафора
вторинна номінація
мовна дійсність
текст
дискурс
url http://zum.onu.edu.ua/article/view/131372
work_keys_str_mv AT hvpetrina metaphorizationofallusivepropernamessecondarynominations
_version_ 1724321853524148224