Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye

Pictorial stimuli can vary on many dimensions, several aspects of which are captured by the term ‘visual complexity.’ Visual complexity can be described as, “a picture of a few objects, colors, or structures would be less complex than a very colorful picture of many objects that is composed of sever...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher R. Madan, Janine Bayer, Matthias Gamer, Tina B. Lonsdorf, Tobias Sommer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02368/full
id doaj-816b9b69260d438b837476a57c9e6a8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-816b9b69260d438b837476a57c9e6a8d2020-11-24T23:19:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-01-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.02368280667Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the EyeChristopher R. Madan0Christopher R. Madan1Janine Bayer2Matthias Gamer3Matthias Gamer4Tina B. Lonsdorf5Tobias Sommer6Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanySchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United KingdomDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyPictorial stimuli can vary on many dimensions, several aspects of which are captured by the term ‘visual complexity.’ Visual complexity can be described as, “a picture of a few objects, colors, or structures would be less complex than a very colorful picture of many objects that is composed of several components.” Prior studies have reported a relationship between affect and visual complexity, where complex pictures are rated as more pleasant and arousing. However, a relationship in the opposite direction, an effect of affect on visual complexity, is also possible; emotional arousal and valence are known to influence selective attention and visual processing. In a series of experiments, we found that ratings of visual complexity correlated with affective ratings, and independently also with computational measures of visual complexity. These computational measures did not correlate with affect, suggesting that complexity ratings are separately related to distinct factors. We investigated the relationship between affect and ratings of visual complexity, finding an ‘arousal-complexity bias’ to be a robust phenomenon. Moreover, we found this bias could be attenuated when explicitly indicated but did not correlate with inter-individual difference measures of affective processing, and was largely unrelated to cognitive and eyetracking measures. Taken together, the arousal-complexity bias seems to be caused by a relationship between arousal and visual processing as it has been described for the greater vividness of arousing pictures. The described arousal-complexity bias is also of relevance from an experimental perspective because visual complexity is often considered a variable to control for when using pictorial stimuli.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02368/fullvisual complexityaffectarousalvalenceeyetrackingemotion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher R. Madan
Christopher R. Madan
Janine Bayer
Matthias Gamer
Matthias Gamer
Tina B. Lonsdorf
Tobias Sommer
spellingShingle Christopher R. Madan
Christopher R. Madan
Janine Bayer
Matthias Gamer
Matthias Gamer
Tina B. Lonsdorf
Tobias Sommer
Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye
Frontiers in Psychology
visual complexity
affect
arousal
valence
eyetracking
emotion
author_facet Christopher R. Madan
Christopher R. Madan
Janine Bayer
Matthias Gamer
Matthias Gamer
Tina B. Lonsdorf
Tobias Sommer
author_sort Christopher R. Madan
title Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye
title_short Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye
title_full Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye
title_fullStr Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye
title_full_unstemmed Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye
title_sort visual complexity and affect: ratings reflect more than meets the eye
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Pictorial stimuli can vary on many dimensions, several aspects of which are captured by the term ‘visual complexity.’ Visual complexity can be described as, “a picture of a few objects, colors, or structures would be less complex than a very colorful picture of many objects that is composed of several components.” Prior studies have reported a relationship between affect and visual complexity, where complex pictures are rated as more pleasant and arousing. However, a relationship in the opposite direction, an effect of affect on visual complexity, is also possible; emotional arousal and valence are known to influence selective attention and visual processing. In a series of experiments, we found that ratings of visual complexity correlated with affective ratings, and independently also with computational measures of visual complexity. These computational measures did not correlate with affect, suggesting that complexity ratings are separately related to distinct factors. We investigated the relationship between affect and ratings of visual complexity, finding an ‘arousal-complexity bias’ to be a robust phenomenon. Moreover, we found this bias could be attenuated when explicitly indicated but did not correlate with inter-individual difference measures of affective processing, and was largely unrelated to cognitive and eyetracking measures. Taken together, the arousal-complexity bias seems to be caused by a relationship between arousal and visual processing as it has been described for the greater vividness of arousing pictures. The described arousal-complexity bias is also of relevance from an experimental perspective because visual complexity is often considered a variable to control for when using pictorial stimuli.
topic visual complexity
affect
arousal
valence
eyetracking
emotion
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02368/full
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherrmadan visualcomplexityandaffectratingsreflectmorethanmeetstheeye
AT christopherrmadan visualcomplexityandaffectratingsreflectmorethanmeetstheeye
AT janinebayer visualcomplexityandaffectratingsreflectmorethanmeetstheeye
AT matthiasgamer visualcomplexityandaffectratingsreflectmorethanmeetstheeye
AT matthiasgamer visualcomplexityandaffectratingsreflectmorethanmeetstheeye
AT tinablonsdorf visualcomplexityandaffectratingsreflectmorethanmeetstheeye
AT tobiassommer visualcomplexityandaffectratingsreflectmorethanmeetstheeye
_version_ 1725577872397041664