Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR “Ensembles”, MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors

Proteins are molecular machines requiring flexibility to function. Crystallographic B-factors and Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations both provide insights into protein flexibility on an atomic scale. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lacks a universally accepted analog of the B-factor. However, a la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Reinknecht, Anthony Riga, Jasmin Rivera, David A. Snyder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/5/1484
id doaj-815b1b94a9f34ddb92548e68f82c5ded
record_format Article
spelling doaj-815b1b94a9f34ddb92548e68f82c5ded2021-03-10T00:03:10ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492021-03-01261484148410.3390/molecules26051484Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR “Ensembles”, MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-FactorsChristopher Reinknecht0Anthony Riga1Jasmin Rivera2David A. Snyder3Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Health, William Paterson University 300 Pompton Rd, Wayne, NJ 07470, USADepartment of Chemistry, College of Science and Health, William Paterson University 300 Pompton Rd, Wayne, NJ 07470, USADepartment of Chemistry, College of Science and Health, William Paterson University 300 Pompton Rd, Wayne, NJ 07470, USADepartment of Chemistry, College of Science and Health, William Paterson University 300 Pompton Rd, Wayne, NJ 07470, USAProteins are molecular machines requiring flexibility to function. Crystallographic B-factors and Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations both provide insights into protein flexibility on an atomic scale. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lacks a universally accepted analog of the B-factor. However, a lack of convergence in atomic coordinates in an NMR-based structure calculation also suggests atomic mobility. This paper describes a pattern in the coordinate uncertainties of backbone heavy atoms in NMR-derived structural “ensembles” first noted in the development of FindCore2 (previously called Expanded FindCore: DA Snyder, J Grullon, YJ Huang, R Tejero, GT Montelione, <i>Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics </i>82 (S2), 219–230) and demonstrates that this pattern exists in coordinate variances across MD trajectories but not in crystallographic B-factors. This either suggests that MD trajectories and NMR “ensembles” capture motional behavior of peptide bond units not captured by B-factors or indicates a deficiency common to force fields used in both NMR and MD calculations.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/5/1484Friedman’s testbackbone atom coordinate variances and uncertaintiessuperimposition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher Reinknecht
Anthony Riga
Jasmin Rivera
David A. Snyder
spellingShingle Christopher Reinknecht
Anthony Riga
Jasmin Rivera
David A. Snyder
Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR “Ensembles”, MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors
Molecules
Friedman’s test
backbone atom coordinate variances and uncertainties
superimposition
author_facet Christopher Reinknecht
Anthony Riga
Jasmin Rivera
David A. Snyder
author_sort Christopher Reinknecht
title Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR “Ensembles”, MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors
title_short Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR “Ensembles”, MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors
title_full Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR “Ensembles”, MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors
title_fullStr Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR “Ensembles”, MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors
title_full_unstemmed Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR “Ensembles”, MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors
title_sort patterns in protein flexibility: a comparison of nmr “ensembles”, md trajectories, and crystallographic b-factors
publisher MDPI AG
series Molecules
issn 1420-3049
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Proteins are molecular machines requiring flexibility to function. Crystallographic B-factors and Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations both provide insights into protein flexibility on an atomic scale. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lacks a universally accepted analog of the B-factor. However, a lack of convergence in atomic coordinates in an NMR-based structure calculation also suggests atomic mobility. This paper describes a pattern in the coordinate uncertainties of backbone heavy atoms in NMR-derived structural “ensembles” first noted in the development of FindCore2 (previously called Expanded FindCore: DA Snyder, J Grullon, YJ Huang, R Tejero, GT Montelione, <i>Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics </i>82 (S2), 219–230) and demonstrates that this pattern exists in coordinate variances across MD trajectories but not in crystallographic B-factors. This either suggests that MD trajectories and NMR “ensembles” capture motional behavior of peptide bond units not captured by B-factors or indicates a deficiency common to force fields used in both NMR and MD calculations.
topic Friedman’s test
backbone atom coordinate variances and uncertainties
superimposition
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/5/1484
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherreinknecht patternsinproteinflexibilityacomparisonofnmrensemblesmdtrajectoriesandcrystallographicbfactors
AT anthonyriga patternsinproteinflexibilityacomparisonofnmrensemblesmdtrajectoriesandcrystallographicbfactors
AT jasminrivera patternsinproteinflexibilityacomparisonofnmrensemblesmdtrajectoriesandcrystallographicbfactors
AT davidasnyder patternsinproteinflexibilityacomparisonofnmrensemblesmdtrajectoriesandcrystallographicbfactors
_version_ 1724227245493452800